Channel
@eternalsugaryconfa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
275subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002954317333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eternalsugaryconfa |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eternalsugaryconfa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 275 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 281 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 281 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (22 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,982 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
27 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5249016438819159277 | 21 | 77.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
.𖥔 ݁ ˖๋࣭ 𐙚 ℰ𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓈𝓊ℊ𝒶𝓇 𝒸ℴℴ𝓀𝒾ℯ #Esc #Fsc #Fsc #Ssc #Crk #Crwc Хедканон на то, что Шугар была очень ранима, и поэтому постоянно плакала, если Салт был груб/холоден с ней из-за характера Вот ваша Ферст Шугар и сестричка её с их детьми мелкими Подпишитесь https://t.me/missingnwhat .𖥔 ݁ ˖TAKE
❤1
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
Всем пр я лишилась своего телефона мне дали батин и мне в скором времени купят новый телефон
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
𝐸𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑦🌟 Ох как же я обожаю рисовать Шугар. Я рисую её довольно таки часто в тгк - @taffochkafluff. ❤️ ПРЕДЛОЖКА
custom 52490164388191592773
Signed сирен
[🐇] - привеет!! давно искал канал с пнг по серии игр "Cookie run"? Так вот, хочу представить вам канал :: ↓ ➜ @cookiekingdom_png !! [🐇] - новый канал где вы сможете найти пнг именно с тем персонажем что вам нужен! но если вдруг спрайтов с вашим вайфу персонажем нет на канале просим написать в комментария под постом с запросами об этом! нам нужна именно твоя подписка.. #пнгкукиран #кукиран #пнг #cookiekingom #png
Signed — ɢᴀᴛᴏꜰɪsʜɪ / ᴠɪɴᴄᴇɴᴛ | #Шмель / #Яндере |
. . ֺ ⏝︶⏝ 𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐭 . ⁝ ★ ?? 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 ֺ ױ ⬫ — —— уж очень понравился шип ෧෧ lionfish , хотите найти побольше → 𔓕 . . контента с ними . . ? :3 ㅤㅤㅤ♡ 𝒲elcome 𝗍ō l𝕚๑𝚗f𝕚𑂘𝕙ㅤᴅ𐐼ׄ𝕚l𝚢 & ᧃׄf --- channel special for you ⏝︶ ㅤежедневные посты с этими милашкамиㅤㅤ ֺ 𓏏 ㅤ︶⏝ㅤ 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝔂𝓸𝓾 .. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⏜︵ㅤ с’est adorable . ♡゙
❤1
Signed — ɢᴀᴛᴏꜰɪsʜɪ / ᴠɪɴᴄᴇɴᴛ | #Шмель / #Яндере |
︵︶ ꯭─ ꒰ ꒰ఎ 🤩🤩🤩 𝂅 ໒꒱ ꒱ ꯭─︵︶ 🤩.оче⵿нь труд︩︪︣но офо︭︢︣рмлять и︭нфо? 🩵 Ма⵿︭︢лᨵׁׅ︢︣ где публикуют шабло︭︢︣ны бе⵿з тгп, а очень хоч︩︣ется? 𓎢𓎟𓎡 ꒰ఎ🤩🤩🤩໒꒱ 𓎢𓎟𓎡 То︭︢︣гᧁа...♡֟፝᪾⋆ ⵿｡˚︢︢ ︩︩︪ ✿︩ 🤩🤩୨︭︢︣୧ 🗝elco𝐦ꫀׁ t𝜊 кф и︭н︭︭ф𖹭ິ⃪ۣ ֺֺ ֺ ࿙⃛፝֟࿚⃛ 𝆹𝅥 𝆭 𝂅ׄ︵︶ . ۫ 𝆹𝅥 ⑅ ׄ𓈒ִ ֺ 𝇌 🫧ㅤ” 𓈒ֵ۫ Мы⵿ ϐыклад︩︪︣ывае⵿м шабло︭︢︣ны с инф𑄜 п𖹭ິ⃪ۣстами, так 𝝊 с тгп, та⵿︭︢к и без него, также делаеო никнеймы. Вы⵿ мо︭︢︣жете бра⵿︭︢ть их абс…
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
ПРОСТИТЕ МЕНЯ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ЧТО НЕ СДЕЛАЛА ДАЛЬШЕ НЕДЕЛЮ ПЕЙРИНГОВ
custom 52490164388191592774
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
 🤍ы попали… ✨ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨🫗🫶🫶🫶 🔤ы — ᴄᴇᴛь, ᴨᴩᴇдᴄᴛᴀʙᴧяющᴀя ᴄᴏбᴏй ᴋᴀнᴀᴧы ᴨᴏ ʙᴄᴇᴧᴇннᴏй иᴦᴩы Ꮯᴏᴏᴋiᴇ Ꮢun, ᴦдᴇ ᴛы ʍᴏжᴇɯь ʙɜяᴛь нᴀ ᴄᴇбя ᴩᴏᴧь ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴀ иɜ ϶ᴛᴏй ᴄᴇᴩии иᴦᴩ.🤍 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩— Наш уважаемый веб-сайт ждет вас! В силах владельца предложить не завышенную норму, не строгие, но базовые правила, и как же без хорошей и понимающей администрации?🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Удивили? Тогда приходите к нам!🤍
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
ᅠ ᅠ ↳ 𝐇𝐄𝐘 𝐇𝐄𝐘. . 𝐖𝐀𝐈𝐓 𝒂 𝒔𝒆𝒄 !! ⤸ .. ᅠ⌛️] Эй, не хотелось бы у меня что нибудь спросить?? ᅠ⌛️] Или просто устраивать хаос вместе со мнойᡣ𐭩 ᅠ ۶ может просто посидеть со мной... ᅠ ᅠ ну раз у тебя столько тупых вопросов я могу тебе тогда ответить ࿔ ᅠ ⁀⁀ 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓷 . . 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐄 ༉ ᅠ Timekepper blog
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
.𖥔 ݁ ˖๋࣭ 𐙚 ℰ𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓈𝓊ℊ𝒶𝓇 𝒸ℴℴ𝓀𝒾ℯ #Esc #Wlc #Crk .𖥔 ݁ ˖CREDIT meoqjellyfish1 on tt
custom 52490164388191592773
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
.𖥔 ݁ ˖๋࣭ 𐙚 ℰ𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓈𝓊ℊ𝒶𝓇 𝒸ℴℴ𝓀𝒾ℯ #Esc #Wlc #Crk .𖥔 ݁ ˖CREDIT _apdlwh on tt
custom 52490164388191592773
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
.𖥔 ݁ ˖๋࣭ 𐙚 ℰ𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓈𝓊ℊ𝒶𝓇 𝒸ℴℴ𝓀𝒾ℯ #Esc #Wlc #Crk .𖥔 ݁ ˖CREDIT dolliessugarr on tt
Signed 𐙚┆₊⊹ ៸៸ 𝘚𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘸𝘢𝘯 𓈒 ⑅
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eternalsugaryconfa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 316,514 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓊆ིྀ ࡛ ֹ ۪ 𝙴𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚂𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝙲𝚏 ֺ ۫ ̼ 𓊇ྀི 𓊆ིྀ ࡛ ֹ” (@eternalsugaryconfa), 275 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eternalsugaryconfa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.