Channel
@eternal_tales
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002150317687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eternal_tales |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eternal_tales |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 88 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 89 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 87 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 88 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 88 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 84.5% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eternal_tales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
We stayed silent when our rivers were polluted. We stayed silent when the air became difficult to breathe. We stayed silent as inflation made everyday life harder. We stayed silent while education became less accessible. We stayed silent as basic infrastructure failed millions. We stayed silent in the face of corruption and endless looting. We stayed silent when the safety of citizens was compromised. We stayed silen…
❤2
Why her ???❤️
❤1
WHY HIM? They asked me, "Why him?" I smiled, but my heart answered before I could. "Because he became the person I never knew I was waiting for." I don't love him because he's perfect. I love him because, somehow, he became my peace in the middle of my chaos. His voice feels like comfort, his presence feels like home, and even on the hardest days, the thought of him makes life a little easier to carry. People ke…
❤5💘2
We spend so much of our lives chasing extraordinary moments that we often forget where real happiness quietly lives. It lives in an arm wrapped around your shoulder, in a child who feels safe enough to watch the world from your embrace, and in the silence where nothing needs to be said because love has already spoken. Time will change our faces, our homes, and our dreams. The child in our arms will one day walk ahea…
❤7👍1👻1
Indians and the government have completely lost basic empathy. Forget supporting any political narrative, forget the protestors, but they do not give a fuck about any lives lost at this point, be it the students who committed suicide because of the system failure, or be it a scientist who worked for local cause. A middle aged man on a hunger strike. Forget resigning or a big step, they are not even ready for a dialo…
❤2
Beauty doesn't always come with wisdom. A beautiful face doesn't necessarily mean a beautiful mind. Listening to Sunitha garu speak about "my body, my right" and questioning why women need to fight for their rights was genuinely disappointing. She once gave voice to strong, memorable characters like Roopa and Seetha in Shekhar Kammula's films. Yet hearing views that seem to dismiss the realities many women face fel…
🔥3
Not every epic is about heroes. Some are about the women's history asked to stay silent. The Forest of Enchantments gives Sita her own voice and not as a symbol of sacrifice, but as a woman of courage, love, grief, and quiet strength. It reminds us that true resilience isn't about enduring every storm; it's about refusing to lose yourself within it. Some stories aren't meant to be retold. They're meant to be reclai…
❤5
When I was a kid, my nanamma once told me about her wedding and used the word destiny. I immediately asked her How is it destiny, amma? Wasn't it just an arranged marriage decided by parents? With a smile, she ran her fingers through my hair and replied with 'No,amma. Your tata and I were in love for two years.' But you weren't even from the same place. How did that happen? He came to see my cousin, but he notice…
❤4
In the name of praising one politician, defaming another state doesn't make your state stronger or more developed. Instead of constant comparisons and political or religious drama, the focus should be on improving the economy, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and the basic needs of citizens. We are already dealing with serious challenges like pollution, poverty, unemployment, rising temperatures, heatwaves, a…
❤5
Reading this felt less like a wish for luxury and more like a wish for peace. Not just a house made of walls, but a place where a I can finally it belongs to myself ❤️
❤3
Some books entertain you, but some books make you sit quietly and think. Azadi felt like that to me. It talks about freedom, politics, fear, and the way society slowly changes around us. Arundhati Roy writes in such a raw and honest way that it almost feels like a conversation rather than a book. Every page makes you question something you thought was normal. Even the cover feels powerful like freedom trying to survi…
❤3👍1
Some nights don’t ask for noise, just a little light, a quiet corner, and a heart trying again to survive Between unfinished goals and soft shadows, peace still found its way to the table 🩵🩵 -Eternal_tales
❤4❤🔥1👌1😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eternal_tales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eternal Tales” (@eternal_tales), 88 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eternal_tales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.