Channel
@eternal_starling
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001860886774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eternal_starling |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eternal_starling |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 150 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,755 |
| Reactions total | 296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
296 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 196 | 66.2% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 8.45% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 6.42% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 5.41% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 5.07% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.70% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 2.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.35% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.338% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eternal_starling. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я общалась с кое-кем очень приятным про мои восприятия, и меня спросили - ты, получается, испытываешь неловкость за открытость? Ты ведь щас проявила открытость, а потом сразу скорчилась от неловкости. Я попыталась различить что произошло, и тут у меня возникла такая открытость, которой либо никогда не было, либо я не помню когда она у меня была. При этом она переживалась так, как будто она всегда была, как будто это …
❤12💘5
Разбирали старую конфликтную ситуацию, где Бодх выступал арбитром. Стороны не смогли прийти к согласию в описании ситуации. Тогда Бодх сказал, что этой ситуации больше нет. Существуют только версии того, что произошло, в головах у участников, а ситуации больше нет и разбирать уже нечего. Поэтому самое разумное и конструктивное - это аннулировать подобные ситуации. Перестать обижаться, перестать разбирать их, жить так…
👍10🔥9💯3🤔3🤣1
Каждая обида которую ты помнишь - источник ядовитого нф. Если зачем-то мне нравится копить такие истории, в которых возникала обида, ради какой-то утилитарной цели, я должен быть на 100% уверен что обиды больше не испытываю. - Бодх.
❤11💯4
Нельзя винить кошку за то, что она не тигр. - Бодх.
👍13❤1❤🔥1
Кормлю лис в парке рядом с местом, где живу.
❤15🥰7💘1
Я написала этот пост, смотрю на фотку и опять плачу - надо же так просрать столько лет жизни.
❤7💔2
Вот такой я была, когда я считала себя уродиной, недостойной внимания.
❤28💔11🔥1
Открытие про себя, которое у меня было во время путешествия с беженками. Я часто говорила и писала, что покс для меня легкое восприятие, что я часто его испытываю. Потом мы кое-что разбирали, и я различила, что у меня очень часто возникает чсу. Например, если мне говорят, что у меня в психике что-то клевое, или просто, что я клевая, или я делаю что-то клево, то у меня почти всегда возникает какая-то ломка и увереннос…
❤7💔2💘1
Этот пласт чсу уже, конечно, расшатан и подорван со многих сторон, и многое из чсвшного пласта над ним тоже расшатано и что-то убрано. Но в целом эта конструкция все еще во мне, и я вот такой гибрид из глубинного чсу и якобы компенсирующего его чсв. Когда я различила уверенность в том, что я не могу просто быть, иначе я никому не понравлюсь, даже приятным людям, - и мне надо доказывать, что я заслужила внимание, по, …
❤11💔1
У меня опять такой сдвиг щас, после которого то, что раньше казалось мельтешением нэ, особо не мешающим, стало восприниматься как пиздец в психике. Я в таких ситуациях всегда растеряна, потому что кажется, что произошел откат, раз так много нэ, но щас вроде понятно, что это не откат, и нэ не стало больше. Но я как будто прозрела немного, и нф-нэ всплыли ближе к поверхности внимания. Ну и жопа у меня в психике…
❤9
Я привыкла составлять о себе мнение по тем моментам, в которых я себя анализирую. Но есть много ситуаций, в которых я полностью засыпаю и вообще понятия не имею что со мной происходит. Особенно если происходит что-то неожиданное. Например, щас меня неожиданно разбудили и мне надо было быстро вылезти из кровати и начать решать бытовую проблему. В таких ситуациях я как будто (как будто - потому что я не делаю это осозн…
❤11💯1🤔1
File, posted without a caption
❤6❤🔥4💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eternal_starling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Purple Starling” (@eternal_starling), 150 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eternal_starling.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.