Насчёт второй авторской: Да, изначально я говорила, что не планирую как либо представлять ее тут, но с учётом того, что с оверкатом на данный момент полный тупик, почему бы и нет, если вас заинтересуют герои🤏🏼
💘1

Channel
@esyagradskaya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002375906803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esyagradskaya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esyagradskaya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 41 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 40 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 39 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 39 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 37 | 34.6% | |
| custom 5420612150504730896 | 16 | 15.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5253892446470836766 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| custom 5323576143364784849 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 6.54% | |
| custom 5388626798906985876 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| custom 5253574674725506995 | 4 | 3.74% | |
| custom 5249384543286231131 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.87% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Насчёт второй авторской: Да, изначально я говорила, что не планирую как либо представлять ее тут, но с учётом того, что с оверкатом на данный момент полный тупик, почему бы и нет, если вас заинтересуют герои🤏🏼
💘1
Что было бы вам интересно?
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💘1
Надо бы что-то замутить эдакое по этом поводу...
💘1
Тем временем, нас уже целых 40!!!😭🫂 Я очень-очень рада этой большой для меня цифре, спасибо, что вы со мной, люблю-обнимаю🫶🏼
❤🔥6💘5custom 54206121505047308963❤1
Я уверена, что это Ноа и среднее арифметическое всех девушек в академии, но не могу этого доказать.
custom 52538924464708367664😍2💘1
Буду рада вашим реакциям!!🫂🖤 Маленькая напоминалочка
💘3custom 53886267989069858763👍2
Я готова визжать от любви к этим двоим😭
💘6custom 52535746747255069953custom 53235761433647848493
✨✨ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 by Анви Рид ⊹˙:꩜˚:⋆𓂃࣪Она пыталась строить из себя долбаную Гермиону Грейнджер, чем, кстати, и нравилась Ноа. Но на каждую зануду, по законам жанра, находился дурак, который, пользуясь своим невысоким ай-кью, топил ее заледеневшее сердце. И хоть Ноа был умен, как… как самый умный из самых умных на интеллектуальном ток-шоу для гениев, для Соль он готов был стать Р…
custom 54206121505047308966💘4❤🔥3custom 52493845432862311311custom 52535746747255069951custom 53886267989069858761
Signed ⋆°.✶ Сладкоежка ✶.°⋆
💌 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Какая твоя главная мечта? У меня нет четко сформулированной. Наверное, найти любимое дело, которое станет моей профессией, будет доставлять удовольствие и приносить стабильный доход. Эта главная мечта скорее основана на основном на данный момент моем переживании, так что, возможно, она не совсем объективна🤏🏼 Ссылочка на анон есть в описании профиля, если что!
💘4custom 53235761433647848491
Мне так нравится эта история!!😭 Я в восторге... И от сеттинга, и от сюжета, и от героев... Анви Рид - гений. Сделать трёх ключевых мужских персонажей в трёх абсолютно разных типажах, чтобы каждая читательница нашла что-то себе по душе🤌🏼 Я чувствую родство с Ноа Эдвином, ахаха
❤4custom 52538924464708367662💘1custom 53235761433647848491
Соль с Эбель так и уснули на полу. Обнимаясь, они ежились от сквозняка и перетягивали одеяло друг у друга. «Ты чертовски красива… — подумал Тимо, когда Эбель, сладко потянувшись, поудобнее улеглась на руке. — Я еще никогда так не жалел о том, что умер. И, будь я жив, точно не стал бы упускать такую как ты». «Общество мёртвых и исключительных» by Анви Рид #цитаты
❤2custom 52538924464708367662💘1custom 53235761433647848491
«Правило 24 секунд» by Юля Артеева Эта книга занимает особенное место в моем сердце, потому что именно с нее началось мое знакомство с прекрасной Юлей Артеевой, чьи книги я горячо люблю. Очень хотела передать атмосферу, а получилось ли у меня, судить уже вам) Моя любимая песня из плейлиста истории, кстати🤏🏼 Буду рада обратной связи🫂 #криворукиеэдиты
custom 54206121505047308965❤🔥4🔥2💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @esyagradskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что было бы вам интересно?
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☕Еся Градская / books / writer /eternity of mistakes🪜” (@esyagradskaya), 41 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esyagradskaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.