Channel
@estupidocinema
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
389subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003509442601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @estupidocinema |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/estupidocinema |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 389 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 376 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 376 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (21 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,458 |
| Reactions total | 472 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
472 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 102 | 21.6% | |
| 😁 | 92 | 19.5% | |
| 💊 | 62 | 13.1% | |
| 💅 | 38 | 8.05% | |
| 🗿 | 34 | 7.20% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 5.30% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 4.87% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 4.66% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 2.75% | |
| 🤓 | 13 | 2.75% | |
| 🦄 | 10 | 2.12% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 0.847% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 0.847% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 0.636% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.636% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 0.636% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.636% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.636% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.424% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.424% | |
| 10 further kinds | 11 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alice Subservience (2024). Filme da robô milf interpretada pela atriz que no final dos anos 2000 era musa de Hollywood e foi usada e abusada até ser descartada feito bagaço de laranja, fala sobre uma família normal no futuro próximo em que a esposa precisa de um transplante de coração, e fica a maior parte do tempo internada, pois ela não vive no país do SUS nem tem a fortuna do gordão ex-global. Para cuidar da famí…
🤣13🌭3🔥3🤮2
Dr. House Série que faz o público leigo e os estudantes de medicina babarem feito autistas nível 99 por seu roteiro supostamente genial, fez muito sucesso nos anos 2000 e caralho a quatro. Nela temos House, médico de um importante hospital cujos companheiros de trabalho não descobrem porra nenhuma, deixando o momento estrela para o protagonista desvendar o mistério de cada paciente. O curioso é que as doenças sempre…
🤣11👏8
Menos um filme bosta com lacração. Mesmo que façam mais um Blade com Wesley Snipes e tenha lacrate no roteiro, só a presença do ator fará muita gente ver o filme. @EstupidoCinema
👍17👏4
Tempo pill de Amy Smart, famosa por Efeito Borboleta (2004) e Adrenalina (2006). @EstupidoCinema
😢10💊4😨4🤯2❤1
Anunciado próximo filme do Christopher Nolan, a cinebiografia de Barack Obama, primeiro presidente negro dos Estados Unidos, suspeita-se que o diretor não tratará do fato dele ter feito acordo nuclear com o Irã e de peritos de Israel terem comprovado que seus documentos de identidade e certidão de nascimento são falsos. @EstupidoCinema
🤣27😁4🖕2
O tempo pill foi generoso com o Jason Statham. Mas o cara faz exercícios e com certeza uma dieta fabulosa pra ter esse físico aos 59 anos. @EstupidoCinema
🗿21💊6🦄3
A normalização do homem ser otário voluntário para vagabunda não é recente. Série: iCarly (2007-2012). @EstupidoCinema
💊17😁8👏1🤮1
Julius Rock/ Todo Mundo Odeia o Chris E chegou a vez dele, o maior mangina da galáxia nos anos 80, época em que se passa a série. Julius leva uma vida merda morando em bairro violento cheio de ladrões, trabalha como peão em dois empregos pra bancar Rochelle, a esposa narcisista egoísta que o humilha e trata mal todo dia, o Chris, que começa a série como trombadinha juvenil, o Drew, garoto vagabundo que não faz nada …
💊19😁15💅3
Fox McCloud (StarFox) / Super Mario Galaxy (2026) Pois é o filme do Super Mario Galaxy ficou bem legal na minha opinião. Ficou divertido trouxe novos personagens como o Yoshi, tbm o filho do Koopa. Mas o mais legal do filme é ver a raposa do espaço. Pra quem jogou lá na época do Super Nintendo, pode afirmar que é bemmmm nostálgico. Afinal de contas quem poderia imaginar que os efeitos gráficos iriam evoluir tanto a …
👏9👨💻3🤓3
Charles Xavier pisando em ovos para não admitir que rejeita a Mística por ela ser baranga, enquanto o Magneto dá uma de São Jorge. Puro Psy ops de Hollywood para iludir homens e mulheres betas de que a aparência não importa ou que tem gente que acha bonito o que é feio. Filme: X-Men Primeira Classe (2011).
😁18💊7🌚4
Griffith de Berserk (1997). Moço delicadinho com o cabelo branco de poodle fru-fru, comanda o Bando do Falcão, um grupo de mercenários na Europa medieval. Resgata da miséria Caska, uma guerreira mulatinha, e Guts, um órfão. Os três viram grandes amigos, mas quando Guts decide ir embora, Griffith chuta o pau da barraca e faz sesgo proibido com a filha do rei para quem prestava serviços, é capturado e torturado terriv…
😁17💅4🦄4🍓1💋1🥴1😍1
Único ponto negativo nesse filme é o DeadPool bosta. Esse Dentes de Sabre ficou foda, mas foi jogado fora depois, deveria ser ele o vilão principal em Logan (2017), e não aquele clone genérico do Wolverine que ninguém liga. Filme: X-MEN Origins Wolverine (2009). @EstupidoCinema
🗿11❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @estupidocinema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 109,442 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Estúpido Cinema / Failed Cinema” (@estupidocinema), 389 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estupidocinema.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.