Channel
@estheti_girl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003835759747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @estheti_girl |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 5 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/estheti_girl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 19 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 18 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 18 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
73 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 45 | 61.6% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 26.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎶Доброе время суток уважаемые дамы и господа. @fantasy_word_mega представляет вам самые прекрасные каналы на просторах телеграм. Если вы заинтересованы то подписывайтесь 🌌 🌌 А я желаю вам хорошего и приятного времяпрепровождения
✨ Всем сладких снов ✨ 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
❤3🔥1
Доброе утро 💙сегодня ты можешь сделать чуть больше, чем вчера — и этого уже достаточно 💙 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
❤4
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 Всем отличного дня и настроения 💓💖 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
🍓4
🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💖 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
🍓5
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 💖 Сегодня — твой шанс сделать чуть лучше, чем вчера. 💖 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
🍓4
▫️🔲🔳🔸🔳🔻🔷🔳🔻 🔷🔳🟨🔺 💖 Пусть мысли станут тише, а внутри станет спокойно и мягко. 💖 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
❤3🍓2
😋 Мини- урок по рисованию 💖 💖 Делитесь своими рисунками в комментариях 💖 💕 @estheti_girl 💐
🥰3🍓2
💖Парой можно услышать совет: мыть голову раз в 3–4 дня, чтобы «не травмировать луковицы» и сохранить естественный защитный слой. И в этом есть доля смысла — но важно понимать глубже. Кожа головы вырабатывает себум — естественный барьер, который защищает, увлажняет и поддерживает баланс. 💓Когда мы моем голову слишком часто, особенно без необходимости, этот слой смывается быстрее, чем успевает восстановиться. В ответ к…
🍓4
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 💖У тебя все получится 💖 Р.S: одна из любимых персонажей в КР 🤭 💕 @esthehi_girl 💐
🍓4
▫️🔲🔳🔸🔳🔻🔷🔳🔻 🔷🔳🟨🔺 💖Ты сегодня молодец 💖 💕 @esthehi_girl 💐
❤4
💖Потягивания вверх — 1 минута 💖Наклоны вперёд (мягко) — 1 минута 💖Кошка–корова — 1–2 минуты 💖Планка — 20 сек 💖Поза «собака мордой вниз» — 1–2 минуты 💖Заверши: глубокий вдох и медленный выдох. 💕 @esthehi_girl 💐
🍓3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @estheti_girl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем привет ☎️ подумываю над новыми рубриками для канала
The shares total 251%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@estheti_girl named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aesthetic Girl 🍁” (@estheti_girl), 19 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estheti_girl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.