Channel
@escape4romreality
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003832550039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @escape4romreality |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/escape4romreality |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 157 | +19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 138 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 137 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 137 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,415 |
| Reactions total | 505 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
505 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352775723339778397 | 101 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 43 | 8.51% | |
| custom 4920481866223452906 | 41 | 8.12% | |
| custom 5377739142710991895 | 39 | 7.72% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 7.13% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 6.73% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5377516796549044381 | 26 | 5.15% | |
| custom 5375068042420065743 | 23 | 4.55% | |
| 🤝 | 23 | 4.55% | |
| custom 4920440814926037998 | 19 | 3.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 3.76% | |
| 💅 | 17 | 3.37% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 3.17% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 2.38% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 1.98% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 1.98% | |
| 👨💻 | 6 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 505reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот этот святой человек — с которым я не знакома, без особой причины — прислала мне невозможной красоты🥰 Совершенно безвозмездно, даже доставку не дала оплатить😭 Посмотрите, как красиво рисует!🥰 Все хороши: Хван заигрывает со мной, не стесняясь ни Ёнбока, ни Банчана рядом — но Джисон!! От Джисона я бьюсь в экстазе!😭 Как же хорошо на него ложится образ шута, источающего тоску😭🔥
custom 492048186622345290624❤11
А теперь самое интересное. Зачем же могли разнести по пабликам фразу, которой не было? Думаю, специально, на фоне предыдущего дня (когда Феликса просили позвать Хёнджина) акгэ подсуетились и вбросили этот тейк с неумением читать. А может, и в предыдущий день на месте проведения ничего неуважительного по отношению к Ёнбоку не было. И это полностью спланированная интернет акция, которую организовать гораздо проще. …
😭24👨💻6
Смотрела я запись вчерашнего фанмитинга, и на моменте чтения Феликсом записок вслушивалась особенно внимательно, кто там что ему сказал из зала. И, знаете, что? Сомневаюсь, что кто-то вообще ему что-то говорил по поводу чтения. Он и прочитал довольно быстро оба раза (не было разницы с тем, как читали другие мемберы), и, судя по его собственной реакции и реакции остальных, не было там неуважительных возгласов. Можн…
😭6😁2
🦋#Hyunjin #Nabi 🩷KinkittyAI🩷
🔥16❤🔥8
Я пищала ультразвуком с этого Хёнджина, когда впервые увидела. И пищу снова!🌟
Очень я люблю фото Феликса без макияжа и/или без постобработки🥰 Там, где видна текстура, рельеф кожи. Возраст. (полывшие линзы не обязательны, но даже они не портят 😅) Нефотошопленные версии кажутся мне более красивыми — как будто больше видишь его самого, чем образ в представлении фанатов или агентства (Это, кстати, всех мемберов касается — не только Феликса)
custom 537773914271099189518custom 49204408149260379989❤7💯5
Меня вдруг шарахнуло осознанием, что Хёнджин стонет не на корейском, а на английском😏 Может, конечно, потому что стоны обращены к Феликсу.😏 Или просто по привычке? 🌟 В любом случае, оба варианта хороши😄
custom 535277572333977839737custom 53750680424200657437❤3
А после хёнибини сердечка Минхо почему на Ликса взглянул и глаза потом закатил?😁
custom 537751679654904438126🤣12😁2
А вам не показалось, что как будто сначала рука Хёнджина дёрнулась приобнять за талию?😏 Но сработали предохранители, послав сигнал, что мы вообще-то не дома😳 И лучше просто похлопать (кто вообще хлопает по талии?!), как будто вы два заправских бро😏
🤝23custom 537506804242006574316custom 492044081492603799810💯5
Я думала, предыдущая причёска моя любимая? Забудьте! Эта — просто шикарно передаёт его вайб! Вообще, я вижу по его стилю (все эти приспущенные штаны и нирвана футболочки с подранными рубашками) — что панк и рок так и рвутся наружу из Хёнджина. Наверное, тоже поднадоело быть диснеевским принцем, хочется пожёстче образ. И ему безумно подобное идёт: как раз достигается эффект той же двойственности, что и у Ёнбока. Т…
🥰17custom 492048186622345290617custom 535277572333977839717
🥟:«Как вам альбом!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Нравится!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????? Или так себе?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!» 🥟«Альбом хорош» 🥟«Вам же нравится!!!!!!!!!!!???????!» Так и представляю, как он подпрыгивал на стуле, когда это писал😅 Что ответим хорёчку? 😏 Уже успели послушать?
custom 535277572333977839715❤🔥11🤔10
они созданы друг для друга😆
😁30💅17
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @escape4romreality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 34,312 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“escape from reality” (@escape4romreality), 157 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/escape4romreality.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.