Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PREPARADOR CASO PRÁCTICO ESCALA EJECUTIVA POLICÍA NACIONAL CNP

Channel

PREPARADOR CASO PRÁCTICO ESCALA EJECUTIVA POLICÍA NACIONAL CNP

@escalaejecutivacnp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

278subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003823843513
TypeChannel
Username@escalaejecutivacnp
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 10 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/escalaejecutivacnp

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24427826112 August 2026 — 244 subscribers12 August 2026 — 244 subscribers20 August 2026 — 250 subscribers27 August 2026 — 267 subscribers4 September 2026 — 272 subscribers12 September 2026 — 277 subscribers26 September 2026 — 278 subscribers12 August 202626 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 45 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239–283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 11:18278+1
12 Sept 2026, 08:56277+5
4 Sept 2026, 18:39272+5
27 Aug 2026, 23:13267+17
20 Aug 2026, 06:45250+6
12 Aug 2026, 15:04244no change
12 Aug 2026, 07:30244first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4739.8%
❤4134.7%
👏1311.0%
❤‍🔥86.78%
👍54.24%
🥰21.69%
🆒10.847%
🫡10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ¿SE LE PUEDE CORTAR LA LUZ A UN OKUPA? (La trampa STS 2963/2026) Las RRSS arden con resúmenes rápidos y titulares a medias de esta STS. Ya sabéis qué pensamos del "ruido" de internet: un titular te da likes, pero no te da el APTO en Ávila. Acabamos de enviar a nuestros alumnos esta Píldora Jurídica destripando la resolución al milímetro. Sin hacer spoiler (ya que está explicada en el Caso 18), os garantizamos una…

🔥3❤2

2 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC229 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

¡Hola a todos! Hoy nuestros alumnos de casos prácticos han recibido un PDF con flashcards de la Constitución (como las de la imagen) para repasar visualmente uno de los bloques más densos. Para no dejaros con las manos vacías por aquí, os compartimos un recurso brutal: los compañeros de OpositaTest han habilitado un curso exprés y totalmente gratuito sobre la CE78 ⚖️. Tenéis vídeos explicativos por Títulos y bater…

❤2🔥2🥰1

25 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC312 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 RESOLUCIÓN DEL CASO: LA TRAMPA DEL "GORRILLA" Para los que venís de Instagram, aquí tenéis la portada de la Píldora Jurídica que acaban de recibir nuestros alumnos. Como veis en el índice: ni Extorsión, ni simples Coacciones. La calificación avalada por el TS es el Robo con Intimidación. Se trata de una situación operativa cotidiana en la calle ante la cual, como futuros Inspectores y mandos, no podéis dudar. En…

👏5❤4

24 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC250 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Aquí tenéis el post del Poder Judicial con el esquema visual para no volver a fallar esta pregunta: 📌 PINCHA AQUÍ

🔥4❤1🥰1🆒1

24 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC225 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Según el art. 355 CP, los Jueces o Tribunales podrán acordar que la calificación del suelo en las zonas afectadas por un incendio -forestal- no pueda modificarse en un plazo de hasta...

  1. 20 años19%
  2. 30 años71%
  3. 40 años10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥5❤2

10 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC381 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🚨 BOE EE PROMOCIÓN XLI 🚨 ¡Ya lo tenemos aquí! Os dejamos adjunto el documento completo del BOE publicado hoy con la convocatoria de ingreso a Escala Ejecutiva. Os resumimos lo más importante para las instancias: 🏃🏻‍♂️ Sedes Físicas: Alicante, Cádiz y Madrid. 📚 Sedes Teoría: Ávila, Cádiz y Valencia. 🗓️ Fecha límite: 31 de julio. Descargad el PDF, revisad con atención los requisitos, el tema de baremos y, sobre todo…

❤4🔥4👏1

7 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC267 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 ARRANCAMOS: CICLO DE CASOS 13-16 🚔⚖️ ¡Buenos días a todos! Damos el pistoletazo de salida al nuevo ciclo de preparación de élite para la Escala Ejecutiva. Seguimos subiendo las revoluciones y el nivel de exigencia. Entramos en la recta más técnica de la jurisprudencia. ━━━━━━━━━ ⚖️ ━━━━━━━━━ 📦 ¿QUÉ OS ESPERA EN ESTE CICLO? ⚖️ 4 Casos Inéditos (13-16): Construidos sobre el análisis de más de 20 Sentencias del Tr…

❤2🔥2👏1

7 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC353 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

━━━━━━━━━ ⚖️ ━━━━━━━━━ 🆕✅ NOVEDAD P2 y P3: LOS "CHECKS" DE EVALUACIÓN. Incorporamos una guía rápida y extremadamente visual con los ticks exactos que el Tribunal exige y tiene apuntados en su plantilla oficial de corrección. Sabrás qué puntos clave tienes que tocar y cómo estructurarlos para asegurar la nota máxima en la segunda y tercera pregunta. Además, al tener este formato, te sirve como esquema para estudiar …

❤6

29 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC292 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

¡𝐍𝐔𝐄𝐕𝐎 𝐀𝐂𝐔𝐄𝐑𝐃𝐎 𝐃𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐈Ó𝐍! 🤝 Damos un paso más en vuestra preparación. Nos aliamos con 𝐎𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭 con condiciones 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐬 para que reventéis el temario: 💶 Acceso a test por solo 𝟖€ 𝐀𝐋 𝐌𝐄𝐒. 🔓 Sin ningún tipo de permanencia. 🎯 Test a tu medida, preguntas 100% justificadas, modo retos y actualizaciones constantes ante cualquier reforma. El trabajo duro lo pones tú, nosotros las mejores herramientas. 👀 MÁS I…

❤‍🔥5❤2🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 18:59 UTC439 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ¡ATENCIÓN FUTUROS INSPECTORES! 🚨 El TS ha pegado un hachazo histórico a la verdadera naturaleza de los documentos cambiando para siempre la forma de valorar jurídicamente algunos de los más cotidianos. Si en tu examen todavía usas las reglas que te enseñaban las academias hace un par de años para calificar una factura, un ticket de compra o un DNI enseñado desde la pantalla de un móvil... estás suspenso. O domin…

❤3🔥2

1 Jun 2026, 05:31 UTC423 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 ARRANCAMOS: CICLO DE CASOS 9-12 🚔⚖️ ¡Buenos días a todos! Hoy damos el pistoletazo de salida al bloque más avanzado, técnico y exigente de nuestra preparación. Entramos de lleno en la fase de los Macro-Casos. Si creíais que lo habíais visto todo, preparaos para subir al siguiente nivel. ━━━━━━━━━ ⚖️ ━━━━━━━━━ 📦 ¿QUÉ OS ESPERA EN ESTE CICLO? ⚖️ 4 Macro-Casos Inéditos (9-12): Construidos sobre el análisis estrat…

🔥4❤1

20 May 2026, 18:42 UTC335 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 ¡Y LO QUE AVISAMOS, LLEGÓ! PUBLICADO HOY EN EL BOE 🚨 Hoy, 20 de mayo, entra oficialmente en vigor la 4ª reforma de la Constitución Española (Art. 69.3: Formentera ya tiene senador propio) 🇪🇸📜 Mientras la gran mayoría de opositores hoy corre a actualizar sus temarios a última hora y con dudas, nuestros alumnos llevan días con la redacción literal y el análisis de esta reforma bien machacados. En una preparación d…

❤‍🔥3🔥3❤1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @escalaejecutivacnp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz86 voters

Según el art. 355 CP, los Jueces o Tribunales podrán acordar que la calificación del suelo en las zonas afectadas por un incendio -forestal- no pueda modificarse en un plazo de hasta...

  1. 20 años19%
  2. 30 años71%
  3. 40 años10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PREPARADOR CASO PRÁCTICO ESCALA EJECUTIVA POLICÍA NACIONAL CNP” (@escalaejecutivacnp), 278 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/escalaejecutivacnp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.