موفقیت همیشگی نیست؛ شکست هم کشنده نیست.. تنها یک چیز اهمیت دارد... و آن هم شهامت ادامه دادن است... #وینستون_چرچیل 🆔 @esanj
❤18👍2

Channel
@esanj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,379subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001340396165 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @esanj |
| Created | 24 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/esanj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 4,379 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 4,381 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 4,377 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 4,374 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 4,374 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (16 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,590 |
| Reactions total | 622 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
674 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 437 | 64.8% | |
| 👍 | 174 | 25.8% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 3.71% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 3.56% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.742% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.742% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.593% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 674reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
موفقیت همیشگی نیست؛ شکست هم کشنده نیست.. تنها یک چیز اهمیت دارد... و آن هم شهامت ادامه دادن است... #وینستون_چرچیل 🆔 @esanj
❤18👍2
وقتی انسان به بلوغ میرسه، یکی از اولین چیزهایی که از اون دست میکشه، تجمل و خودنماییه. چون نمایش دادن، اغلب زینت «من»ی هست که در درون احساس کمبود میکنه. انسان هرچه از درون قویتر میشه: کمتر نمایش میده، کمتر حرف میزنه و کمتر تلاش میکند چیزی رو ثابت کنه. 🆔 @esanj
❤26👍3
🧠یک قدم فراتر از خودشناسی با تست شخصیت شناسی چند وجهی مینه سوتا (MMPI3) جدیدترین نسخه تست تخصصی MMPI-3 با ۳۳۵ سؤال و ۵۲ مقیاس در ایسنج منتشر شد. این آزمون به شما کمک میکند: ✅ شناخت دقیقتری از ویژگیهای شخصیتی خود پیدا کنید ✅ الگوهای هیجانی، رفتاری و ارتباطیتان را بهتر بشناسید ✅ نقاط آسیبپذیر و توانمندیهای روانشناختی خود را بررسی کنید ✅ با آمادگی بیشتری وارد فرایند مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شوید ✅ گزارشی جامعتر …
❤7
جودی عزیزم… ما به اندازهی خاطرات خوشی که از دیگران داریم آنها را دوست داریم و به آنها وابسته میشویم و هر چه خاطرات خوشمان از شخصی بیشتر باشد، علاقه و وابستگی ما بیشتر میشود. پس هر کسی را که بیشتر دوست داریم و میخواهیم بیشتر دوستمان بدارد، باید برایش خاطرات خوش زیادی بسازیم تا بتوانیم در دلش ثبت شویم. 🆔 @esanj
❤15👍7🔥1
زنی به مشاور خانواده گفت: من و همسرم زندگی کم نظیری داریم ؛ همه حسرت زندگی ما رو میخورند. سراسر محبّت, شادی, توجّه, گذشت و هماهنگی. امّا سؤالی از شوهرم پرسیدم که جواب او مرا سخت نگران کرده است. پرسیدم اگر من و مادرت در دریا همزمان در حال غرق شدن باشیم چه کسی را نجات خواهی داد؟ و او بیدرنگ جواب داد: معلوم است, مادرم را ؛ چون مرا زاییده و بزرگ کرده و زحمتهای زیادی برایم کشیده! از آن روز تا حالا خیلی عصبی و ناراحتم به …
❤22👍12👏6
به موقع گفتن، مهم تر از گفتنه به موقع بودن، مهم تر از بودنه به موقع شنیدن، مهم تر از شنیدنه به موقع بغل کردن، مهم تر از بغل کردنه به موقع قدم زدن، مهم تر از قدم زدنه به موقع انجام دادن، مهم تر از انجام دادنه به موقع بودن و جدی بگیرید. 🆔 @esanj
❤21👍11
انسان فقط در یه چیزی تاب نمیاره؛ اونم ابهامه. ابهام هر موجودی رو از پا درمیاره. در واقع جهنم از برزخ خیلی بهتره! 🆔 @esanj
👍16❤13👏3
انتقامی در کار نیست؛ چون تو روزی خانهٔ من بودی. و من جایی را که روزی در آن آرام گرفتهام، به آتش نمیکشم. 🆔 @esanj
❤23🥰5👎1👏1😢1
مادربزرگم میگفت در و که کامل نبندی نمیدونی بادِ بعدی که بیاد میبندتش یا بازش میکنه این میشه بلاتکلیفی... تو زندگیت همیشه یا برو بیرون یا بیا تو و بعدش درو محکم ببند. اجازه نده هیچکس بلاتکلیف نگهت داره! 🆔 @esanj
👍29❤17😢7👏3
زندگی به همه فرصت برابر نمیده. بعضیها مسابقه رو از روی خط شروع میکنن، بعضیها چند کیلومتر عقبتر، بعضیها هم بدون تلاش میرسن به خط پایان. مقایسه کردن خودت با آدمهایی که مسیر متفاوتی داشتن، فقط رنجت رو بیشتر میکنه. 🆔 @esanj
❤38👎1
سندرومِ «باید خوشحال باشم» این روزها یک جور استبدادِ "مثبتاندیشی" راه افتاده که اگر غمگین باشی، انگار مجرمی! اما داستایوفسکی خوب میدانست که رنج، تنها منبعِ آگاهی است. کسی که رنج نکشیده، سطحِ روحش صیقلی و صاف باقی میماند؛ هیچ چیزی به او گیر نمیکند، هیچ عمیقی را نمیفهمد. غم، بخشی از سیستمِ دفاعیِ روح است. اجازه بده گاهی ابری باشی. لازم نیست مدام لبخندِ ژتونی بزنی. درختها هم تمام سال شکوفه نمیدهند؛ مدتی را باید …
❤31👍7
پژوهشهای زیادی رو خوندم، متوجه شدم: رمز موفقیت؟! +استمراره رمز رابطه خوب؟! +حرف زدنه رمز سلامت روان؟! + ورزش و خواب کافیه 🆔 @esanj
❤23👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @esanj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,118,580 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کافه روان ای سنج” (@esanj), 4,379 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esanj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.