Channel
@ertb_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
942subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001343436740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ertb_channel |
| Created | 14 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ertb_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 942 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 949 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 958 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 958 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
143 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 77 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 37.1% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2024 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ertb_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 August 2024 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вибачте, не стосується ERTB. Але дозвольте прорекламувати мій продукт. Повністю безкоштовна гра. Зроблена власними руками. Запрошую всіх долучитися до гри «Близько» у вебі вже зараз 👉 blyzko.com Це українська словесна гра на відчуття слова: щодня нове секретне слово, і ти вгадуєш його за змістом. Є режим хардкору, де гра підказує лише, наскільки ти близько - 🔥 гаряче, 🌤️ тепліше, ❄️ холодно - аж поки не відгадаєте.
❤2😁1
🇺🇦 Українська Друзі, ERTB живе вже 6 років – і весь цей час росте лише завдяки вам. Я хочу зробити його кращим, а найкраще за всіх знаєте, чого не вистачає, саме ви – ті, хто користується ботом щодня. Розкажіть у коментарях: – Що вам подобається? Чим користуєтесь найчастіше? – Що дратує або працює не так, як хотілося б? – Чого бракує? Які функції хотіли б побачити? – Що, на вашу думку, варто виправити в першу чергу…
❤3
🔧 Patch notes • Silent mode for digest • Тихий режим для дайджесту
В честь Дня Народження нове оновлення. Ну і багато під капотом в API по вашим фідбекам.
Ну, нам шість рочків) 🍰
❤5👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🚀 Update – smarter number & currency recognition Here's what just got better 👇 • 📊 Ranges – type 100-200 USD or двісті-триста гривень and the bot now shows both 100 and 200, not just one. (Descending like 200-100 is still treated as subtraction.) • 🎯 Fewer wrong picks – we squashed the most common cases where the bot grabbed a random currency from ordinary text, phone specs or game listings. Cleaner, more reliable …
❤1
• We have weakened the settings for the ban system. • We have fixed some bugs.
🔧 Patch notes • Squashed a bug that was crashing the bot • /card now pulls all-time stats — new card available once a day • /card 30d shows the last 30 days — refreshable once an hour
🇬🇧/🇺🇸 What's new in ERTB 5.0.0? 🚀 Farewell, ERTB Pro 👋 • We've discontinued the ERTB Pro subscription. We thought it over and decided that all features should be open and free for everyone. • Inline mode is now free for everyone. • The advanced parser (with W2N and M2N support) is now the default for all users. • Everyone who ever supported us with a Pro subscription has been added as our donors. Thank you! 💚 New …
❤2👍1
🇬🇧/🇺🇸/🇺🇦 2020 - 1.0 2021 - 2.0 2023 - 3.0 + 4.0 2024 - 4.4.0 + Premium ... 2026 - 5.0 I don't want to spam this channel with a bunch of messages, so I'll leave it for important news and updates. Therefore, I invite you to my abandoned channel, where I have already posted some news about the bot: @a_volkovskey Я не хочу спамити цей канал безліччю повідомлень, тому залишу його для важливих новин та оновлень. Тому я …
👍4
🇬🇧/🇺🇸 🔥 Exciting Updates for ERTB! 🔥 1️⃣ We’ve reintroduced W2N in the free version! Now, you can convert words to numbers for free again! For example, "twenty-five" = 25, "10k" = 10,000. 💸 Lowered the price of the basic subscription from 150🌟 to 100 🌟! 🎁 For those who recently purchased the subscription for 150 stars, we’re giving you an additional 14 days for free as a thank you! 📅 We’ve also added new subscri…
👍64❤37😁10
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ertb_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 638,470 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ERTB news” (@ertb_channel), 942 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ertb_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.