Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

em|🥪

@error_miner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

189subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002463048497
TypeChannel
Username@error_miner
Description🗣️Люблю блокбенч ЛС - @errorminer
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/error_miner

Growth

1897 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 189 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 189 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:017 Aug 2026, 07:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:16189no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01189first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
275
Videos
1
Links
43

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥16092.0%
🔥105.75%
👍42.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @error_miner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 February 2026 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 14:37 UTC524 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я овощ майнкрафт овощи майнкрафт бедрок смотреть овощи бесплатно майнкрафт блокбенч овощи майнкра #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥15

21 May 2026, 15:54 UTC684 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привеее, там есть я, там мои глипглорбы, зипзапы, бибыбобы 👽 👽 👽 #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥13

21 May 2026, 15:49 UTC212 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @beleberdarofooPhoto

ВОТ И КОЛЛАБА ПОДОШЛА К КОНЦУ Возможно, я ещё буду проводить такие эксперименты.Но пока незнаю. - :Сразу начну с негативных новостей. К сожалению, у шести запланированных участников не нашлось времени, чтобы сделать своего крипера, так что выходит меньше. ВСЕ КТО УЧАСТОВАЛ: Reaper, Skarrier, E-M, RanzhomChesse, Shitov, CW, Cepra, Paketov, Flawa, Copperok, MagaFin, Keyframe, Lolverton, Cucuber, Zozorob, RTD, Jess

10 May 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,610 views36 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привеее, колокол🔔, вроде крутой вышел, сделал довольно спонтанно (он не покрашен с других сторон, но это неважно, их не видно) #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥33👍2🔥1

8 May 2026, 09:22 UTC683 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Привет👋👋👋 , скин по приколу, пака👋👋👋 #скин@error_miner

❤‍🔥13

1 Apr 2026, 15:17 UTC489 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто бы это мог быть #щитпост@error_miner #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥10

28 Mar 2026, 12:11 UTC413 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

(ему нравится вкус железа) Вообще, я +- регулярно сижу в бб, но у меня много незаконченных приколов, привет, ну вот сейчас я буквально спонтанно за час набросал, незнаю закончу ли когда нибудь, шейд ещё надо ленььь #wip@error_miner #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥10

8 Mar 2026, 12:36 UTC428 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А да точно, с 8 марта ура победа ура

❤‍🔥8

5 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,240 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бенди ура ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Это уже второй пост за этот месяц, я существую, ура!!!!! Кстати, я пытался делать модель бенди 2 года назад, но там прям страшилище, хз, наверное в комментарий под постом просто так кину И я не помню как я вообще оформлял посты, но да ладно #модель@error_miner

❤‍🔥16🔥2

3 Mar 2026, 19:02 UTC385 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я сейчас пойду спать, спокойной ночи кстати, но да, я все же создал, сразу скажу, там не будет ничего полезного, это просто отдушина, поэтому да, это больше для себя и т.п и т.д, поэтому спокойно можно пропускать, просто в моем частном емкале популяция сильно сократилась и я в отчаянии, в ужасе, в там каком нибудь ещё слове, ну короче мне хочется репостить несмешные картинки щитпосты, да, добрых снов пока, прощайте,

❤‍🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @error_miner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 748,900 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“em|🥪” (@error_miner), 189 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/error_miner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.