Channel
@epistoliere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
443subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001485644018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @epistoliere |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/epistoliere |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 443 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 444 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 444 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,465 |
| Reactions total | 155 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
155 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5213144116048715418 | 107 | 69.0% | |
| custom 5213447710107002678 | 33 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5211013013405982209 | 15 | 9.68% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Элиза: я заебалась, я все ненавижу, я ненавижу буквы, я ненавижу Р., я не буду ничего с ним делать Также Элиза: нвм, я сяду делать объемный микроцветочек, чтобы запихнуть его в кольцо, типа это Альдо, чтобы когда я заведу крауд на печать Р. сделать это одной из наградок...
custom 521314411604871541818
Я обожаю пробовать вещи, потому что когда ты пробуешь вещи, ты узнаешь о них мелкие подробности, о которых тебе вряд ли кто-то расскажет (потому что они мелкие). Например, оказалось, что мне удобнее стрелять из лука в очках, потому что я не боюсь ткнуть себе стрелой в глаз + стекло естественным образом ограничивает расстояние, куда стрелу можно увести. К сожалению, для исторички это бесполезно, потому что нормальные…
custom 521314411604871541820
Восемь томов чего угодно это a prospect unpleasant to contemplate — когда их пишешь, читаешь или перевозишь, причем последнее больше всего. Кстати говоря, книжка Канетти заканчивается тем, что герой, едва вернув свою любименькую библиотеку, громко хохочет и сжигает ее вместе со всей квартирой.
custom 52110130134059822098
But I doubt whether even Canetti’s most ardent admirers could wish that he had gone on to complete his epic. The idea that there might have been eight volumes like Auto-da-Fé is a prospect unpleasant to contemplate. И это восторженная рецензия. Действительно, литература должна ощущаться как схватка с медведем. Но не с восемью медведями.
custom 521344771010700267811
Из микрошпротины может вырасти целый Осетр, это очень выгодное вложение
custom 521314411604871541819
В начале недели были найденные брошенные матерью котята, всего четверо - белый, черный и 2 кото-скумбрии. Пройти мимо этих крох было невозможно, взяли к себе, выхаживали и кормили в надежде, что их мать вернется, но этого так и не случилось, а малышам нужен постоянный подкорм, профессиональный уход. Двое котят сейчас в вет.клинике на стационаре, а обе «скумбрии» - на выкорме (сегодня поедут в Зарощино к кормилице на …
custom 52131441160487154183
И такие ребята, на них тоже распространяется.
Можем еще такую акцию повторить: желающим я за скрин доната напишу зарисовку по их заказу (любые известные мне персонажи, в разумных пределах)
custom 52131441160487154182
Маша покрала кшчк с улицы, кшчк зовут Курага и это единственная курага, которую я уже люблю. Я сама на мели после некоторых ситуаций, но если вы сможете подкинуть или ркпостнуть, то это будет мило с вашей стороны и я вас поцелую!
custom 52131441160487154186
Так, чуваки, сбор на Курагу открыла. Никогда такого не делала, но сейчас я просто не потяну эти расходы. Сумма в 36к это по максимуму, включая анализы и прочее + подстраховка. Если выйдет меньше, я переведу остаток в приют Преданное сердце. После того, как ей почистят пасть, будет гистология и там уже станет понятно, насколько я влетела в интересные дела. Собрать это богатство нам хорошо бы до следующей недели, чт…
custom 52131441160487154183
I've spent so much time on writing, I ran out of ideas & characters, and I still did not achieve shit.
custom 52110130134059822097
Мне очень грустно... перескажите самые орные постельные сцены, которые встречались вам в текстах. Ну или нормальные, но чтоб смешно было
custom 521344771010700267810
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @epistoliere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 488,390 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сущее бытиé” (@epistoliere), 443 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epistoliere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.