Channel
@episteme_ac
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002347958198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @episteme_ac |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/episteme_ac |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 158 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 157 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 158 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 158 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
187 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 49.2% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 13.9% | |
| 🤝 | 11 | 5.88% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 5.35% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.28% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.535% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌪️ Two named storms. Zero hurricanes. August has started the clock. Will the Atlantic produce its first hurricane by August 31? New hypothesis live on Episteme Arena. 🔗Predict: https://app.episteme.space/hypothesis/34/market 🔗Read: https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/new-episteme-arena-hypothesis-will-6c4
❤4👍3🔥3
💜Before science can be forecast, it has to be compressed into a question. A metric, a threshold, a dataset, and a deadline all shape what the future will be allowed to confirm. Our new essay looks at how scientific complexity becomes a resolvable hypothesis, using a real longevity research case from the Eidōlon testnet. 🔗https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/before-science-can-be-forecast-it
❤4👍3🔥3
Most prediction markets optimize for the answer. We’re interested in the path that produced it. Who changed their mind? What information moved the market? What did everyone miss? That’s where the signal lives.
❤6⚡3👍2
Efi’s FutureScope: Evolution Gets a New Set of Claws 🐾 Nyaa~ scientists are designing new molecular tools for editing life, including proteins with no natural ancestor. Mind your paws around the molecular scissors. 🔗https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/efis-futurescope-evolution-gets-a
❤6🙏3🔥2
Before a claim becomes knowledge, an economy has already formed around it. Our new essay asks which unknowns science sustains, and what it chooses to remember. 🔗https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/the-economy-before-knowledge
❤6👍3👏3
Most histories of science begin after uncertainty has disappeared. We are interested in what came before: expectations, revisions, hesitation, and misplaced confidence.
❤7🤝4👏2
Science makes forecasts constantly: in grants, experiments, roadmaps, and research priorities. New benchmarks are now testing whether AI can make those forecasts before the evidence arrives. Our latest article examines what current models can predict, where their confidence fails, and why science needs a public memory of expectations. 🔗https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/can-ai-forecast-science-before-it
❤6⚡3🔥3
⚡️What happened in June at Episteme? - Griffin-1 went live as a mission-scale public case. - Resolution rules got clearer before outcomes arrive. - Evidence checks focused more on deadlines, source paths, and public signals. - Hypothesis templates for science and technology claims improved. - Product copy around live questions kept getting cleaner. The new Dev Pulse is live. https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/dev-p…
❤6👏3🤝2
New Episteme Arena hypothesis: Will a G20 country reach a new fertility floor before September? 🟡Deadline: 31 August 2026 🟡Signal: official total fertility rate 🟡Resolution: a new national record low in a G20 country Population Futures starts with the table. Info: https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/new-episteme-arena-hypothesis-will-899 Follow the hypothesis on Episteme Arena: https://app.episteme.space/hypothesis…
❤6🔥3👍2
The world keeps receipts. Every claim, forecast, and certainty leaves a trace somewhere. The question is whether we choose to record it before reality answers.
❤5👀1
Efi’s FutureScope: Trend to Watch This Month 🐾 Nyaa~ the sky is getting furrier. June’s FutureScope follows Euclid, the Milky Way’s crowded heart, dark matter, dark energy, and the growing suspicion that the Universe has been hiding far more under the cosmic sofa than we thought. 🔗https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/efis-futurescope-the-dark-universe
❤6❤🔥1
A hypothesis should have a clock. That is the simple idea behind Episteme: make scientific uncertainty public before it hardens into retrospective certainty. 🔗New essay: Science Needs a Deadline https://epistemesci.substack.com/p/science-needs-a-deadline
❤4🔥2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @episteme_ac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EPISTEME” (@episteme_ac), 158 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/episteme_ac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.