Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤㅤ: dadsgrllswife

@epic_pixik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

220subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002673158456
TypeChannel
Username@epic_pixik
Created14 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/epic_pixik

Growth

22013 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 220 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 03:56 — 220 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 18:1714 Aug 2026, 03:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:56220no change
13 Aug 2026, 18:17220first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 14 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 220 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held9 (14 April 20258 August 2026)
Views total70
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,359 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528778332902892554985813.5%
custom 528764890084752844376412.0%
custom 528752613779730863469210.9%
custom 540691054340553016764310.1%
custom 52850571758472067525498.63%
custom 54088388806422168654567.17%
custom 52852377706320681664446.98%
custom 53123070425332760184416.94%
custom 53841092707006902684076.40%
custom 54090940274694020993605.66%
custom 54089137462171522823225.06%
custom 52399744675091849942133.35%
custom 5229111902512107675701.10%
custom 5388572888477483422701.10%
custom 5388665256044148515701.10%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
464
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 8 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
360
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @epic_pixik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2025 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC70 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🎀🎀 🪽〔 𝟎𝟖. 𝟎𝟖. 𝟐𝟔. 〕⸔ 🎀 🤩 🤩𝗱𝗲𝖿𝖾𝗰𝗍 𝗐𝖺𝓼 𝗳𝗼𝗋𝗆𝖾𝓭 𝓽𝗈𝖽𝖺𝘆 ! 🍼🍼 @ 𝐩𝐢𝐱𝐢𝐤 🤩 @ 𝐝𝐚𝐝𝐬𝐠𝐫𝐥𝐥

Signed pixik dadsgrlllvr

14 Dec 2025, 19:01 UTC≈5,320 views672 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026

👻👻👻👻👻👻

custom 5287783329028925549193custom 5285237770632068166140custom 5287648900847528443117custom 528505717584720675245custom 528752613779730863445custom 531230704253327601845custom 523997446750918499444custom 538410927070069026843

13 Dec 2025, 18:11 UTC≈5,230 views912 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5287648900847528443257custom 5285057175847206752187custom 5287783329028925549126custom 538410927070069026872custom 528752613779730863471custom 531230704253327601867custom 523997446750918499466custom 528523777063206816666

19 Nov 2025, 16:52 UTC≈4,620 views516 reactionsread 13 August 2026

👻👻👻👻👻👻

custom 5287526137797308634130custom 5285057175847206752115custom 538410927070069026891custom 528523777063206816638custom 523997446750918499436custom 528778332902892554936custom 528764890084752844335custom 531230704253327601835

30 May 2025, 07:38 UTC≈5,430 views1,069 reactions360 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5408913746217152282322custom 5408838880642216865230custom 5406910543405530167173custom 522911190251210767570custom 538857288847748342270custom 538866525604414851570custom 528778332902892554967custom 540909402746940209967

15 Apr 2025, 10:16 UTC≈5,360 views1,058 reactions26 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5287526137797308634375custom 5287648900847528443217custom 5406910543405530167154custom 528505717584720675263custom 538410927070069026863custom 528523777063206816662custom 528778332902892554962custom 531230704253327601862

14 Apr 2025, 10:24 UTC≈5,590 views1,042 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5409094027469402099293custom 5408838880642216865226custom 5287783329028925549188custom 523997446750918499467custom 528505717584720675267custom 528523777063206816667custom 528764890084752844367custom 538410927070069026867

14 Apr 2025, 10:08 UTC≈17,200 views1,090 reactions67 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

▫️﹫pixik & ﹫irl kangel ⇶ more 🐏🐏 packs 🤩 anon 🤩 wins 🤩 selfpost 🐏

custom 5406910543405530167316custom 5312307042533276018232custom 5287783329028925549186custom 528505717584720675272custom 528523777063206816671custom 528752613779730863471custom 528764890084752844371custom 538410927070069026871

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @epic_pixik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 791,304 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤ: dadsgrllswife” (@epic_pixik), 220 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epic_pixik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.