4 measurements spanning 9 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 662–663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:35
662
-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:34
663
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:53
663
+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:40
662
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 662 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (24 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
1,219
Reactions total
123
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
277 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
213
76.9%
🔥
48
17.3%
👍
14
5.05%
👏
2
0.722%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня состоялась встреча книжного клуба по книге The Burnout 🥳
Участников было 9. Прочитали до конца 4 человека. И это не помешало нашему активному обсуждению сегодня!
Коллеги особенно отметили выбор книги, легкий стиль повествования и вопросы для обсуждения.
Я вдохновлена! Давно не испытала такого , вот честно!
Горжусь своими читательницами! Они входят в 1% активно читающих в оригинале 💪🏼
Девочки, спасибо за …
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Очень прошу вас мне помочь 🙏🏻
Сегодня участвовала в самопрезентации и поняла, что у меня нет единой само презентации.
Для людей не из моей проф среды - я преподаватель Английского для подростков. Для коллег - наставник и автор проекта «Английский для себя любимой»
Лидер сообщества для преподавателей фрилансеров You Matter
Эксперт по бережному тайм менеджменту
А ещё я жена Коли
А ещё я мама второклассницы.
Ещё …
Дорогие, вот и 1 августа.
Как ваш июль? Что самого классного случилось? Что запомнилось?
Налейте себе чайку / кофейку и кайфаните от воспоминаний, big or small.
Я июль запомню
- расхламлением кухни
- походом в бассейн Чайка
- возвращением в танцы!
И, конечно, чтением!
А вы? Поделитесь своим июлем! Давайте вдохновимся на август 💫😘
Ваша Настя Епархина 💜
Ну что, в полете 100 страниц пролетели, а в жизни за последние четыре дня еле-еле осилила 54. Так что можно сказать книга идет туго.
Дорогие, не ждём идеальных условий для чтения! Я вот сейчас сижу с книгой, читаю про мистического парня, рядом с которым мрут девушки как мухи на дико неудобной деревянной лавочке и моя попа уже сама деревянная, но ребенок хочет рыбачить и кто я такая чтобы не дать ей этого странного у…
Завершаю июль на берегах Балтики 🫶🏻
Три недели дочка была у бабушки - это первый наш опыт расставания за почти 8 лет.
8 лет!! Подумать только! Когда время пролетело??!
Пока летела прочитала 100 страниц новой книги. История мистическая, я такое обычно не читаю, но оказывается, когда ты в закрытом пространстве и без попутчиков в виде близких родственников, то ты читаешь только так 🙃 #anastasia_books
Названия книг и…
Пока вы размышляете на тему ролевой модели в вашей жизни, поделюсь относительно новым интервью с Николаем Максимовичем.
Ссылка 🔗 в комментариях
Я только начала смотреть и как всегда восхищаюсь его эрудицией и умением выражать мысли. Несмотря на десятки интервью с ним, мне никогда не скучно с таким невероятным собеседником.
Уверена, что всем учителям стоит многому у него поучиться и тогда никакой искусственный инте…
Говорят, чтобы добиваться многого, у нас должна быть ролевая модель перед глазами.
Меня окружают в #youmatter и не только поистине уникальные женщины с множеством талантов 💪🏼🔥
И буквально на днях я познакомилась с новой женщиной, которая меня мотивирует на действия
Постоянно держу в голове обещание самой себе «Быть смелее!» в 2026 и вот знакомство с экспертом по личному бренду и проявленности, лидером сообщества «…
Мы с сообществом #youmatter два раза в год стараемся выезжать из Москвы и вместе исследуем новое место.
В сентябре, keeping fingers crossed, мы планируем выезд нашей уютной компанией.
Будем рады пригласить нового человека в нашу поездку! Пишите @aeparkhina и я все подробно расскажу!
Пусть в вашей жизни будет много жизни!
Ваша Настя Епархина 💜
Пока меня не было дома, мой мальчик заметно подрос и прибавил в весе 🤩
Меня часто спрашивают, как мы решились завести собаку.
Также как люди рожают третьего ребенка - берут и делают. Так и у нас, только мой третий малыш весьма волосат и хвостат 😂
А у вас есть домашние животные?
❤20🔥3
Signed Анастасия Епархина English teacher
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eparkhina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анастасия Епархина | Английский по любви 💜” (@eparkhina), 662 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eparkhina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
