Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Enzo Di Frenna • BLOG

@enzodifrenna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,363subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001399651938
TypeChannel
Username@enzodifrenna
Created13 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/enzodifrenna

Growth

5,3435,3635,3537 August 2026 — 5,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,344 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,350 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,363 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,340–5,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:355,363+13
10 Aug 2026, 19:265,350+6
8 Aug 2026, 04:255,344+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:465,343no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:365,343first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 5,363 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total17,567
Reactions total421
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 58s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

544 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21439.3%
👍18934.7%
👏529.56%
👌285.15%
😱142.57%
🙏112.02%
🤔101.84%
🤯101.84%
😢91.65%
🏆40.735%
🥰30.551%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 544reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC361 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«Tutto ciò che avviene a livello mondiale, da ciò che dicono in televisione, è tutto un rito magico. Quindi non mi vengono a dire che il paranormale non esiste, che siamo matti, perchè loro vogliono appositamente che noi non conosciamo il mondo invisibile perchè loro lo gestiscono e manipolano l'umanità» - Chantal Dejan, scrittrice dell'invisibile, esoterista e chiaroveggente. Le Ur Lodges massoniche sovranazionali

👍237🤯1

10 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,490 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Da alcuni mesi sono impegnato in lavori di falegnameria e ristrutturazione della casa. Mi sto preparando alla prossima pandemia delle frequenze e ad ogni altra eventuale emergenza globale. Perchè una cosa mi è chiara: non hanno intenzione di smetterla. Ci sono tutti i segnali. Li vedo da ex giornalista investigativo e da cultore di materie esoteriche, astrologiche e chiaroveggenti. Riesco a collegare i puntini ed è c

👍2011👏5🙏4👌2

10 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,500 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

A marzo del 2018 il bravo giornalista Giulietto Chiesa disse: «Nel 2025 l'America avrà l'arma climatica, cioè sarà in grado di modificare il clima di una qualunque parte del pianeta.» Ancora una volta Giulietto ha indovinato le date, come è già successo quando nel 2014 predisse che l'America & la NATO avrebbero usato l'Ucraina per attaccare la Russia e far scoppiare una guerra in Europa. In effetti entro il 2025 l

👍163🥰3🤯1

8 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC883 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

La cosa che mi fa riflettere è che i criminali assassini delle famiglie maledette sono tutti saldamente al comando e nessuno dei loro luogotenenti è finito sulla sedia elettrica o in prigione. Dunque ne deduco che i loro piani di depopolazione mondiale da 8 a 3 miliardi vanno avanti e sui superstiti regnerà il Nuovo Ordine Mondiale. Entriamo nella loro testa per un attimo. Proviamoci. Essendo uno scrittore, posso us

16🤯6😢5👍4

7 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,020 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

L’altro giorno la mamma di una amica e’ morta di timore: era vaccinata Pfizer. In due anni si è spenta. Un mio parente vaccinato Pfizer ha sviluppato un turbo rumore, un altro parente vaccinato Pfizer è collassato e da un anno e’ in stato vegetativo sul letto. Un vecchio amico di scuola vaccinato Pfizer, sottoposti al ricatto del niente stipendio di Draghi, ha sviluppato un tumore maligno e ora vive tra chemio e osp

👍2812🙏7

2 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,400 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sentitiliberadilarapisciellaPhoto

Oggi sento di raccontarvi una parte del mio cammino, perché ogni esperienza ci porta a essere le persone che siamo oggi. Forse queste parole potranno risuonare dentro di voi o portarvi una riflessione. Non perché esista una strada giusta per tutti, ma perché ognuno ha la propria storia. "Pensavo che saremmo invecchiati insieme." Per me il matrimonio era una promessa che durava tutta la vita. Dopo cinque anni di

24🤔5👍3

2 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Un post di una donna speciale, Lara Pisciella,che mi è piaciuto molto. Lei l’ho conosciuto di recente in una costellazione familiare (poi vi racconterò in un articolo molto presto)… Questo è il suo canale Telegram: Lara è una coach, naturopata e costellatruce che lavora solo con le donne. 👇👇👇👇👇👇

👍41

1 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,240 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Molti pensano che avere la chiaroveggenza extrasensoriale sia sempre positivo, bello, interessante, ma la verità è che in alcuni casi è una gran rottura di coglioni per vari motivi. Innanzitutto vedo e sento più cose della gente comune, come ad esempio stamattina che ero nell’ufficio postale e mi sono passati vicino almeno sei persone malate (cioè uno qualsiasi vedrebbe gente normale, ma dall’aura vitale frantumata

👍2211🤔3

31 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,210 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Dopo aver fatto oltre 600 mappe psicoenergetiche (ossia analisi chiaroveggente di aura, chakra e psicomemorie attraverso una foto) ho notato che nel 96% dei casi i malesseri, i conflitti interiori, le insicurezze, e perfino alcune patologie, hanno origine nel rapporto malato con uno dei due genitori, o entrambi. Vengono da me persone devastate da programmi psico-emotivi inconsci, che nel 100% dei casi sono creati co

👍158👏5

31 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC959 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Più missili = più guerra. Pochi giorni fa il Pentagono, su indicazione di Trump, ha firmato un contrato di 59 miliardi con la Lockeed Martin per la produzione di missili Patriot, per passare da 600 a 2.000 al mese entro il 2030 (sempre sto cavolo di duemilatrenta!!), da usare anche nella guerra contro l’Iran. Nei mesi scorsi Lockheed si era aggiudicata dal Pentagono un altro contratto da 35 miliardi per quadruplicar

👍10😢31

31 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,140 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Pavel Durov di Telegram ha usato una foto ironica per spiegare chi è davvero amico dei terroristi: «La Russia mi ha designato come "terrorista" per aver rifiutato le sue richieste di sorveglianza di massa e censura su Telegram. Secondo la legge russa, mi è vietato "pubblicare informazioni su Internet" 😌 I funzionari russi sono evidentemente confusi su chi possa vietare a chi l'accesso a Internet.» Nella seconda f

14👏5👌2

29 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,300 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Guardate questo video: in Cina intere zone stradali sono piene di gente che parla davanti al telefono per fare video e dirette sui social network. È un incantesimo. La Matrix è già qui. Gli schermi divorano attenzione ed energia. Assomigliano agli zombie. Ma invece di camminare barcollando, sono seduti davanti a un monitor digitale e una luce a led. Non ci si relaziona più di persona. Si parla al mondo (al nulla agg

😱14👌96

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enzodifrenna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 546,008 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Enzo Di Frenna • BLOG” (@enzodifrenna), 5,363 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enzodifrenna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.