Channel
@envylash_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
830subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002865523696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @envylash_official |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/envylash_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 830 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 845 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 862 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 862 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
269 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 141 | 52.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 55 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5307498530292652745 | 25 | 9.29% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 8.92% | |
| 💋 | 9 | 3.35% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.60% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.86% | |
| custom 5251324245006372297 | 3 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @envylash_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 February 2026 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Девочки, нам очень жаль💔 В связи с техническими проблемами в работе Telegram‑канала мы завершаем здесь общение. При этом наш магазин продолжает работу в штатном режиме. ✨ Спасибо, что остаётесь с нами! Ждём вас за новыми ресничками. ❣️ МАГАЗИН
❤3
Девушки, а как часто вы пользуетесь накладными ресницами?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
🤔 Правда ли, что накладные ресницы… Сегодня развеиваем главные страхи о накладных ресницах. Сохраняйте, чтобы не потерять! 👇 1. «Они портят свои ресницы» — НЕТ. Ресницы портит неправильное снятие. Если вырывать их сухими или клеить суперклеем (такое, кстати, бывает 😅) — да. Если использовать ремувер (или масляную смывку) — ваши ресницы останутся целыми и невредимыми. 2. «Их видно издалека» — НЕТ. Видно только если…
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥4❤2💯1
✨ Смотрите, как рождается магия выразительного взгляда! ✨ В этом кружочке вы увидите, как аккуратно и профессионально приклеиваются ресницы — шаг за шагом, без спешки и суеты. 😍 Каждая ресничка на своём месте — вот секрет естественного и стойкого результата! 💫 👇🏻 Реснички
❤2❤🔥1
Девушки, а как вам удобнее наносить ресницы? Делитесь опытом в опросе!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Мой идеальный план на субботу: кофе, любимая музыка и... новый образ с Envylash! ✨ Показываю, как я создаю нежный дневной макияж за 15 минут. Главный акцент — наши реснички) А у вас есть свои лайфхаки для быстрого макияжа? «Идеально подойдут для тех кто хочет «универсальный набор ресниц» 💕 Заказать тут 👇🏻 Реснички #тренды_envylash
❤🔥6custom 53074985302926527456🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🤣3
С 8 Марта, наши прекрасные! ❤️ Пусть каждый ваш взгляд будет завораживающим, а ресницы — такими же лёгкими и прекрасными, как ваше настроение в этот день 💌 8 Марта официально признано днём, когда можно: ✔️ Требовать комплименты по поводу своих ресниц. ✔️Носить блёстки на глазах без повода. ✔️Заказывать самое пышное наращивание — «чтобы все ахнули». Заказать реснички здесь Порадуйте себя — вы этого достойны! 😍
❤20❤🔥2💋1
Макияж + ресницы Envylash = взгляд, который невозможно не заметить 💗 Всё гениальное — просто: ✔️ Берём палетку Envylash ✔️ Выбираем эффект (у меня сегодня — «классика») ✔️ Клеим за 5 минут ✔️ Идём покорять 💫 Заказать реснички здесь А вы сегодня с макияжем или без? 👇
❤10❤🔥3custom 53074985302926527453
Нам нужно всего 3 голоса для следующего уровня 🫶🙏🚨 https://t.me/envylash_official?boost
❤🔥9💋5💯4🤣1custom 53074985302926527451
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @envylash_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Девушки, а как часто вы пользуетесь накладными ресницами?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Девушки, а как вам удобнее наносить ресницы? Делитесь опытом в опросе!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вы уже успели попробовать наши реснички микс 520 пучков? Какой эффект вам больше подходит?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 2 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Envylash | Пучковые ресницы” (@envylash_official), 830 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/envylash_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.