Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лабораторная практика | ГОСТ ISO 17025

Channel

Лабораторная практика | ГОСТ ISO 17025

@entry_level

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

485subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002489401320
TypeChannel
Username@entry_level
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/entry_level

Growth

48548948718 August 2026 — 489 subscribers19 August 2026 — 489 subscribers26 August 2026 — 487 subscribers11 September 2026 — 485 subscribers18 August 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 08:55485-2
26 Aug 2026, 21:25487-2
19 Aug 2026, 08:35489no change
18 Aug 2026, 11:30489first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 485 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
1 post measured
Reaction rate
11.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 September 202515 August 2026)
Views total120
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16665.9%
👍7228.6%
👌135.16%
👏10.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC120 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Добрый день! 🌿 ❗️В сентябре планируются к публикации: 🔹️варианты расчетов при верификации с применением контрольной методики измерений; 🔹️ журнал приготовления и учета реактивов с автоматическим подсчетом расхода реактивов по журналу, формированием отчетного документа по учету #полезная_информация

🔥14

17 Jun 2026, 07:19 UTC452 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

Здравствуйте, коллеги! Довольно много информации находится в широком доступе для специалистов руководящих должностей, специалистов систем менеджмента. Два года назад появилась идея создать пространство для рядовых специалистов. Без экспертных мнений, с вариантами решений рабочих задач, с возможностью взять материал для адаптации в работе или просто спросить совет (@Entrylevel1Bot). Несмотря на трудности с ограничен

🔥15👍2

9 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC532 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🔹Вариант оценки необходимого объема при концентрировании пробы

👍8🔥3

16 Apr 2026, 03:16 UTC835 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🔹Вариант оценки значимости коэффициента "а" при определении градуировочной характеристики

🔥10

27 Mar 2026, 03:22 UTC≈1,040 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Коллеги, добрый день! 🌿 В связи с блокировкой платформы от 01.04.2026 информация будет дублироваться в группу "ВКонтакте": https://vk.com/entry_level Канал остается работать в прежнем режиме до тех пор, пока остается возможность🙌 #полезная_информация

👌11

11 Feb 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,440 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🔹Вариант реализации расчетов по внедрению методики методом добавок #внедрение_методик #полезная_информация ❗️В связи с ограничением доступа к платформе рекомендуется скачать материалы по подписке из группы: https://t.me/veriflab_bot?start=sub133876 Если заинтересовал файл, но не хочется оформлять подписку полностью можно купить отдельный файл за меньшую стоимость:http://👉[email protected]

🔥14👏1

11 Jan 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,490 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥15👍1

11 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Автоматический расчёт коэффициентов поправок При большой проходимости проб расчёты дополнительных параметров, таких как коэффициенты поправки могут занимать много времени. Вариант как автоматизировать работу с таблицами и сократить время на определения коэффициентов поправок по таблицами на примере ГОСТ ISO 2173-2013, п.8.1.1 (б) закреплен ниже с примером и разбором формул👇 #полезная_информация #разработка_форм #и

🔥14

27 Dec 2025, 06:57 UTC≈1,120 views19 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🔹Вариант реализации расчётов методом добавок согласно РМГ 76-2014, приложение Б.

👍17🔥2

27 Dec 2025, 06:43 UTC≈1,100 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🔹Вариант оценки неопределенности раствора железа 0,050 г/л

🔥17

25 Nov 2025, 15:45 UTC≈1,580 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

Вариант построения КШ (метод ОК) в единицах измеряемых содержаний на примере ПНД Ф 14.1:2:3:4.121🔥

🔥14👍4

6 Nov 2025, 05:43 UTC≈1,710 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥12👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @entry_level. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лабораторная практика | ГОСТ ISO 17025” (@entry_level), 485 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entry_level.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.