Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

entro. / э’ntro.

@entrobrand

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

286subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002311849353
TypeChannel
Username@entrobrand
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/entrobrand

Growth

286287286.510 Aug 2026, 12:01 — 287 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 09:43 — 286 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:0111 Aug 2026, 09:43
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 286–287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:43286-1
10 Aug 2026, 12:01287first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51908995054651635233834.2%
custom 52468289046011214701816.2%
custom 51929422047960399881311.7%
custom 5192665875190150076109.01%
custom 5229060843940906133109.01%
custom 523776798389544493387.21%
custom 524494698737097380865.41%
custom 523128395337305215943.60%
custom 519285487952097974421.80%
custom 522912574519171194310.901%
custom 523768761646740588010.901%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 5 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Dec 2025, 11:52 UTC576 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дорогие друзья! Мы часто пропадаем, и на данный период это связано с большим количеством проектов и их реализации. Но знайте, что entro. будет развиваться и вернется с совершенно другим масштабом. Для того, чтобы подготовить целую коллекцию, мы заплатим временем и нашими усилиями. тишина — тоже часть работы. мы в процессе. готовим почву для нового этапа. следите за пульсом. 🌟🌟

custom 51929422047960399888custom 51908995054651635236custom 52312839533730521594custom 52291257451917119431

4 Nov 2025, 16:32 UTC933 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

entro. x eley present the end of the glotka. era

custom 51908995054651635235custom 52290608439409061334custom 51929422047960399883custom 51928548795209797442

18 Sept 2025, 13:45 UTC≈1,000 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🌟

custom 51908995054651635236custom 52290608439409061335custom 51926658751901500764custom 52377679838954449333

31 Aug 2025, 15:56 UTC949 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

5 маек до sold out, вы раскупили почти все!!! спасибо всем кто приобрел вчера майки. glotka. sale дальше больше 🌟🌟

custom 51908995054651635239custom 52468289046011214708custom 52377679838954449335custom 51926658751901500761

30 Aug 2025, 16:13 UTC714 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52449469873709738086custom 51908995054651635234custom 51926658751901500762custom 52290608439409061331

30 Aug 2025, 13:11 UTC625 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

что шепчет тишина? 🌟 Есть звуки, которые мы слышим внутри. И образы, которые являются, когда закрываешь глаза. Новая коллекция Glotka — это материализованная тишина перед криком. Это психоделический трип в самом сердце страха, который ты добровольно надеваешь на себя. Мы выставляемся на [отдых24] в рамках KontrKult. Приходи на наш маркет. Загляни в бездну. Бездна ответит тебе. Где: [г. Кронштадт;

custom 52468289046011214706custom 51908995054651635233custom 51929422047960399882

29 Aug 2025, 18:30 UTC463 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ОТДЫХ24 ✨ MARKET ZONE ковен мхов pellucid choza_lab on3mela entro. brand elahoa radiboga dirty's / dirty things

custom 51908995054651635235custom 52468289046011214704custom 51926658751901500763custom 52376876164674058801

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @entrobrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 482,547 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“entro. / э’ntro.” (@entrobrand), 286 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entrobrand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.