Entangle Announcements pinned «AMA Q&A — Entangle Transition Update We appreciate everyone's support, but the project, as it was previously run, is no longer sustainable. We have built top-of-the-line interoperability technology that surpasses much of what’s currently available on the…»

Channel
Entangle Announcements
@entangle_announcement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
209subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002236981177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @entangle_announcement |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/entangle_announcement |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 209 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 209 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 148
- Videos
- 111
- Links
- 281
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 11m 37s
- Average length
- 2m 19s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
269 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 126 | 46.8% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 13.8% | |
| 😡 | 26 | 9.67% | |
| 🍌 | 21 | 7.81% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 7.81% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 4.09% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 3.35% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 2.23% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 🤷 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.372% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
AMA Q&A — Entangle Transition Update We appreciate everyone's support, but the project, as it was previously run, is no longer sustainable. We have built top-of-the-line interoperability technology that surpasses much of what’s currently available on the market. However, due to the departure of some backers, the recent hack, and ongoing market conditions, the project can no longer sustain itself. While the technolo…
🍌19😡12🤣10🤷4🔥1
Entangle Discord AMA 🗣️ Hi everyone! We have an important AMA scheduled for today on our Discord server, where we'll discuss upcoming project directions. When? 📆 - 17.00 UTC Where? - https://discord.com/channels/938906933732212846/1120080849782702090
👍3
The future of Web3 is modular, and we have built it for you. Entangle's design philosophy is simple: make the most complex infrastructure feel fluid. We’ve crafted an architecture where new ideas don’t fight the system, they integrate with it. Grow by adding pieces, not complexity. ✖️ Support X Post
🔥9👏2🤣2👍1
Universal Data Feeds (UDF) is a fast, reliable, and scalable oracle network that provides decentralized apps with access to real-world data. UDF connects off-chain data sources to on-chain environments, delivering updates in under 200ms. ✖️ Support X Post
👍9🔥6🗿3🌚2
Entangle Announcements pinned a photo
NTGL Airdrop Claim Portal is now LIVE 🔥 As outlined in our previous announcements, we are revising our Total Supply from 843 million to 843 billion to mitigate the impact of the recent attack that occurred on March 8th. Furthermore, all token holders who possessed tokens before this adjustment will be entitled to a compensation of 1000 times their original holdings. Self-Custodial Wallet Holders (MetaMask, Rabby...…
🔥19🍌2👏1🥰1
Omnichain communication built for the future of the infinite Web. Learn more about the capabilities of UIP in our one-pager. ✖️ Support X Post
🔥11
If you’ve ever considered making your token omnichain, UTS now makes it possible to do so. Existing tokens can now be deployed on Manta Network. Here’s how it’s done. ✖️ Support X Post
🔥11👏3🌚1
Web2 holds the data. Web3 needs it. We deliver. Entangle taps into any chain, any API, any asset. Our suite of technologies collects data via UDF, moves it via UIP, and integrates directly into your dApp. This is how on-chain communication stays in sync. ✖️ Support X Post
🔥6🤣4
Shadow Forge agents now run on Entangle’s Universal Data Feeds. Sub-200ms omnichain data, fueling real-time AI with the fastest, decentralized verifiable feeds in Web3. Data is the modern fuel, powering AI and dApps, with Entangle, ShadowForge ensure their agents run on the best data infrastructure in the industry. ✖️ Support X Post
👍7🗿2😁2😡1
Entangle's Universal Data Feeds are constantly expanding, now supporting Usual USD, Moonbeam Network, Moonriver Network and Movement. Never miss an update with UDF. Real-time verifiable data in under 200ms, the industry's fastest decentralized feeds. ✖️ Support X Post
🔥5🤣3😡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @entangle_announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Entangle Announcements” (@entangle_announcement), 209 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entangle_announcement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.