Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ensemble stars png

@enstarpng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

277subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004492990168
TypeChannel
Username@enstarpng
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/enstarpng

Growth

2652772716 August 2026 — 265 subscribers7 August 2026 — 265 subscribers7 August 2026 — 268 subscribers14 August 2026 — 277 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:24277+9
7 Aug 2026, 18:03268+3
7 Aug 2026, 00:32265no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48265first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.75%
avg views ÷ 277 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total485
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dream_RonpaPhoto

Пᴩиʙᴇᴛиᴋи!! ✘ Гдᴇ нᴀйᴛи ᴄᴇᴛᴋу ᴨᴏ ᴩᴏнᴨᴇ БЕЗ ᴄюжᴇᴛᴀ!? Вᴇɜдᴇ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴄᴩᴀный ᴄюжᴇᴛ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩый ᴨᴏняᴛᴇн ᴧиɯь ᴀʙᴛᴏᴩу ᴛᴇᴋᴄᴛᴀ .ᐟ.ᐟ ✘ У ʍᴇня ᴨᴏ хужᴇ ᴨᴩᴏбᴧᴇʍᴀ, ʍᴇня ᴋᴏᴩᴏчᴇ ʙыᴨнуᴧи ᴄ ᴄᴇᴛᴋи иɜ-ɜᴀ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ чᴛᴏ я ɜᴀ ᴄᴀᴨᴨᴀ ᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴧ ʍᴀᴛ! Ну чᴏ ɜᴀ ᴨиᴄᴇц .ᐟ.ᐟ 𓂃𓏸𓈒 𓆩 𝘿𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙢 𝙍𝙤𝙣𝙥𝙖 𓆪 𓈒𓏸𓂃 Сᴇᴛᴋᴀ бᴇɜ ᴄюжᴇᴛᴀ, ᴄ ᴨᴩияᴛныʍи ᴧюдьʍи ʙ нᴇй! Вᴄᴇᴦдᴀ ᴩᴀды ɜнᴀᴋᴏʍᴄᴛʙу ᴄ нᴏʙыʍи ᴄᴀᴨᴨᴏᴩᴛᴀʍи) Тᴀᴋ... Зᴀйдᴇᴛё? ﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌﹌ Пᴩиʙᴇᴛ ϶ᴛᴏ нᴀʙиᴦᴀция

Signed РЕСТ | фукона птицу съел [ 🩵🩷 ]

6 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iyowagirls1Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 🧸Любишь вокапи いよわ【ᵢyₒwₐ】??? Ищешь канал с ежедневным контентом с ийова девочками?⭐ Тогда приглашаю тебя в наш дейли⭐~ ♡︎ ♡︎ ♡︎

Signed РЕСТ | фукона птицу съел [ 🩵🩷 ]

6 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shuichisaiharadailyPhoto

🔠𝒽𝓊𝒾𝒸𝒽𝒾 𝒮𝒶𝒾𝒽𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝒻 + 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎 ▫️ ︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶ ᶜʳ. ᵈᵃⁱˡʸᵏᵃᵍᵉˢᵃⁱ/ˢᵃⁱᵖᵃʲᵃˢ [ᵀʷⁱᵗᵗᵉʳ]

Signed РЕСТ | фукона птицу съел [ 🩵🩷 ]

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎁🎀 shׄ𝕚ִ𝕫ִບׄƙִׄ𐐼‌ׄs‌ׄ𑜅 d𐐼‌ׄ𝕚ִℓִυᩛ ⁠⁠⁠⁠ ﹕ 😽 🎀🎀🤩🎀🌟🌟 🌟🌟 ‼️🎀🎀ʙᥲⲙ ׄн︩︪ꫀׄ хִׄⲃׄат𐐼︩︪ꫀִׄт ӄִׄ𑄜ִнⲧִꫀׄнⲧִαׄ с 𐓣︩︪ׄꫀׄйρִִׄບׄнгִꪮִⲙִׄ 😻ᤐֹບׄᤋִуӄִׄαׄᧃׄ𐐼🤩? ? ᥊‌ׄ𑄜ִⲧִиⲧִꫀׄ ᧘ׄюδִׄꪮִׄʙ‌ִαׄⲧִьɕׄяׄ ꫀׄжִׄꫀׄднꫀׄʙ‌ִным ӄִׄ𑄜ִнⲧִꫀׄнⲧִ𑄜ִᨻ с нִບִׄⲙִִׄບׄ ? ?🎀🥹💧🌟 🥹🤩ⲧִ𑄜ִгдαׄ ʙᥲⲙ ִׄ𐓣ׄρִׄяִⲙִִׄບׄӄִִׄꪮִⲙִׄ ִׄⲃ нׄ𐐼ᤐֹ к𐐼нׄаꪒִ !🎀🍭

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gachiaccsPhoto

🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🪦Добро пожаловать в «Gachiakuta Accounts»🪦 🥩 🤩 Wtf? Ты набрёл на сеть телеграмм-каналов посвящённых Гачиакуте. Здесь ты можешь наблюдать за жизнью любимых персонажей. И даже пообщаться с ними! А если пожелаешь, можешь даже стать одним из нас.

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ConTheoryConfessionPhoto

🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆 🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆 𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗. . . 👁 (👤)▪️щешь место, где можешь обсудить теории заговора? (👤) ▪️елаешь знать настоящую правду о мире? (👤) ▪️ли просто познать что-то новое? 𝗡𝗔𝗩𝗜𝗚𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 | 𝗕𝗢𝗧 | 𝗠𝗣 (𝟬+) Теория заговора (конспирология) — термин, который означает объяснение событий или ситуаций (реальных или вымышленных) как последствий заговора могущественных групп, действующих злонамеренно.

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC28 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @slevalicePhoto

₊˚⊹⚪️нравятся горячие 🤩🌟👾 ⌞ персонажи из ♯𝙆𝙝𝙖𝙚𝙣𝙧𝙞'𝙖𝙝☁️⌝ — нужен контент по ним? . . . 🌓𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜 — 𝙆𝙝𝙖𝙚𝙣𝙧𝙞'𝙖𝙝 & 𝘈𝘣𝘺𝘴𝘴 ⌞ᴅᴀɪʟʏ / ᴄꜰ ⌝🤩

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @frm_net

​🎀🌟🌟 . ᴄᴇᴛᴋᴀ, ᴦдᴇ ᴛы ᴄʍᴏжᴇɯь ᴨᴏнᴀбᴧюдᴀᴛь ɜᴀ жиɜняʍи ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴇй нᴀ нᴇᴏбычнᴏй ɸᴇᴩʍᴇ 🗞 🎀 (( 💕 )) 𝗐𝖾𝗅𝗅, 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋'𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 . 🎀 🤩 🤩🤩🎀 . 𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 🎀

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @softcloudnetPhoto

.⸝😀😀😀😀𝄒𝒲𝑎𝑖𝑡, 𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑒 ❗️ 𑄹︭🎶🌟равится 𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 ?💫 🖤 ☺️ что насчет того, чтобы персонажи в хост ау вели свои блоги? 🖤🖤 🤍😇сеть телеграм 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑡 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑢𝑑 ждет вас ~ 🤩

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🩶🩶🎁 , 𝐰𝒂𝐢𝐭‼️ it's . . 🤩 𝒅𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚𝒄𝒇 😻 𝐌𝐫. 𝐀'𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐦 ?! 🌟 . вам нравится манхва «ферма мистера А» и вы ищите 🌟 больше контента по ней ? 𝒘𝒘. заходи и увидишь много контента ! ! 🎀

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @venividiviciForumPhoto

😀 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝒾, 𝒱𝒾𝒹𝒾, 𝒱𝒾𝒸𝒾 💜 Академия 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤💜 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 VVV — сеть телеграм-каналов в магическом сеттинге. Желаете следить за прописанными ориджинал персонажами, связанными так или иначе с академией волшебников? Хотите стать частью интересного сюжета и показать своих героев? Добро пожаловать! 😀 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 💜Правила + анкетница 💜Каноны 💜ВП-пост 💜РТ-пост 💜Список персонажей 💜Сеттинг 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜

💘1

Signed салут

6 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Citlali1488Photo

🪄🪄🪄нуж.но больше 🤩 🌟контента по Ситлали?🤩 но его нигде нет. . . 🤩🔹огда добро пож𝑎ловать в 🌟🌟🌟♾️Citlali Daily♾️ 🫧🫧🤍абор в админы открыт 🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩

💘1

Signed салут

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enstarpng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 133,938 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ensemble stars png” (@enstarpng), 277 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enstarpng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.