Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 582–593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 11:00
592
+3
28 Aug 2026, 10:04
589
+4
20 Aug 2026, 21:04
585
+2
14 Aug 2026, 21:45
583
-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:18
587
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
587
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 57s
Average length
3m 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
190 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
112
58.9%
👍
30
15.8%
👏
20
10.5%
👌
13
6.84%
💔
5
2.63%
😢
4
2.11%
💩
2
1.05%
🙏
2
1.05%
😁
1
0.526%
🤔
1
0.526%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اوضاع را بدتر نکنید
در درمان ACT از استعارهای به نام «گودال و بیلچه» استفاده میشود. تصور کنید ناگهان خودتان را در گودالی عمیق پیدا کردهاید. اولین واکنش چیست؟ شروع میکنید با بیلچهای که در دست دارید زمین را بکنید، به امید اینکه راهی برای خروج پیدا کنید. اما هرچه بیشتر میکنید، گودال عمیقتر میشود.
در زندگی هم وقتی با شکست، اضطراب، تعارض یا اتفاقی ناخوشایند روبهرو میشویم، اغلب همین کار را میکنیم. با خشم، سرزن…
آلفرد آدلر روانپزشک، نویسنده و از روانشناسان بنام اتریشی و بنیانگذار مکتب روانشناسی فردی از شجاعت نترسیدن از قضاوتها و آزادی در نقطهنظرات شخصی میگوید
در مورد آدلر میتوان گفت در دنیای روانشناسی نظریه ای وجود ندارد که از آرای او تاثیر نپذیرفته باشد.
https://t.me/ensandarjostejoyekhish
رودولف درایکورس:
«نگرش ما تعیین کننده معنای حقایق است. حقایق به تنهایی، زندگی به تنهایی، نه خوب و نه بد - نه خوشایند و نه ناخوشایند ـ هستند. آنچه ما از آنها می سازیم مهم است. تقریباً همه چیز تمام احتمالات را در بر دارد؛ حتی مرگ یا درد ممکن است خوشایند و مطبوع بشوند. درد به عنوان نشانه درمان یا پیشرفت (وضع حمل کردن، یا به عنوان اولین نشانه در بهبودی فلجی) ممکن است بسیار خوشایند باشد. از هر چیزی، حتی اهریمن، ممکن است …
درماندگی آموختهشده جمعی نیز حالتی است که جامعه نمی تواند راه حلی برای برون رفت از وضعیت بحرانی بیابد. از نظر شناختی دچار توهمات جمعی شده که یکی از آنها تئوری توطئه است و سبک اسنادی پایدار ، کلی و بیرونی دارند.
از نظر احساسی دچار ناامیدی و از نظر رفتاری گرفتار انفعال می شوند.
در نهایت PTSD جمعی یا اختلال استرس پس از سانحه را تجربه می کنند و اینجاست که جامعه دچار فروپاشی روانی یا از نظر بوئن واپس گرایی اجتماعی میشود…
سقوط قدرتهای مطلق نتیجه رسیدن جامعه به خودآگاهی است
اتحاد مردم فقط تجمع فیزیکی نیست؛ لحظهای است که جامعه میفهمد:
مشکل من شخصی نیست، ساختاری است.
این فهم مشترک، مشروعیت دیکتاتور را از ریشه میخشکاند، حتی قبل از سقوط رسمی
هگل
https://t.me/ensandarjostejoyekhish
از شمار دو چشم یک تن کم
وز شمار خرد هزاران بیش
حقیقتا دل انسان به درد می آید وقتی کسی چون بیضایی را خفته در خاک میبیند.
کارنامه ای پر بار، زندگی غنی، کاردانی قابل و نویسنده ای توانا
کافی است چریکه تارا و مرگ یزدگرد را ببینید تا پی ببریم چه گوهری از دست رفت.
بر این جان پریشان رحمت آرید
که روزی کاردان قابلی بود
https://t.me/ensandarjostejoyekhish
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ensandarjostejoyekhish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتابخانه انگلیسی من🎧😍 @EnglishAudioLibrary · 41,813 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انسان در جستجوی معنای خویشتن” (@ensandarjostejoyekhish), 592 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ensandarjostejoyekhish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.