▫️رستن از بند و بندگی «روانشناسی دانشگاهی» و «دانشگاه روانشناسی» ▪️نوشتهٔ فرشید مرادیان 💬 این نوشتار به بنیادکاویِ دانشگاهِ مدرن و نسبت آن با روانشناسی میپردازد؛ به آن نقطهای که دانش، در پیوند با تکنوکراسی و بروکراسی، از امکانِ پرسشگری به ابزارِ سنجش، طبقهبندی، و هنجارسازی بدل میشود. دانشگاه با فروکاستنِ زیستجهان به دادههای محاسبهپذیر، سوژۀ انسانی را در بندِ مقولات علمی و سنجههای صلب گرفتار میکند؛ و رو…

Channel
انسان و زندگی
@ensan_zendegi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,124subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386166653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ensan_zendegi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ensan_zendegi |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 1,124 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 1,122 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 1,124 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 1,123 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,122 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,120 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 1,118 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 1,121 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 1,116 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 1,117 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 1,115 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,115 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
«آیا یک دیندار میتواند یک روانکاو هم باشد؟» در روزگاری که دین دیگر به خلوتِ ایمان رضایت نمیدهد و بار دیگر سودای تصرفِ تمامیِ زیستجهانِ انسان را دارد، این پرسش دیگر پرسش از جمعِ مسالمتآمیزِ دو هویت نیست. پایِ دو نسبتِ یکسره متفاوت با حقیقت در میان است: یکی حقیقتی که باید بدان مؤمن بود و در برابرش تسلیم شد؛ دیگری حقیقتی که درست آنجا آغاز میشود که قطعیتها فرومیریزند. اهمیتِ این نوشتارِ دکتر اکبر جباری، هم در جسا…
سومین حلقهٔ همخوانیِ متونِ لَکانی فراخوانی به یک نفهمیدنِ باشکوه همواره نشست نخستِ حلقهٔ لکانی برایم بسیار هیجانانگیز است، چون قرار است یک حلقۀ تازه را بگشاییم. حال یک خبر بد دارم و یک خبر خوب: خبر بد اینکه این رویکردیست که دنبال کردنش بهصورت عقلانی واقعاً دشوار است؛ و خبر خوب اینکه هیچکسی نیست که بتواند آنرا بهصورت عقلانی درک کند. از این رو لکان میگفت «اگر فهمیدهاید، بیشک اشتباه کردهاید». پس از یک نظ…
شروع دوره: جمعه یکم خردادماه ساعت ۱۰ صبح برای نامنویسی به تلگرام انسان و زندگی پیام دهید. #سمپوزیوم 🌀https://t.me/ensan_zendegi
پوشهٔ شنیداری کارگاه رهایی از اوهام بهیاری اندیشهٔ محافظهکارانه امیرحسین ابراهیم پنجشنبه ۲۳ بهمنماه ۱۴۰۴ #سمپوزیوم #لبه_تاریکی 🌀https://t.me/ensan_zendegi
- چه باید کرد؟ ۰ همان کارهایی که زندانیان آشویتس کردند. #لبه_تاریکی #وزش_ظلمت #رستگاری_ایمان #ورطه_امید
Faith is taking the first step, even when you don't see the whole staircase. «ایمان» برداشتن نخستین گام است در حالی که تمامی پلکان در تاریکیست. 📝 مارتین لوترکینگ #لبه_تاریکی #رستگاری_ایمان #ورطه_امید 🌀https://t.me/ensan_zendegi
In theory, many topics with which Freud dealt permit both a hermeneutic-spiritualand a positivistic-pragmaticapproach. When this is so, the English translators nearly always opt for the latter,positivismbeingthemost important English philosophical tradition. در مقام نظر بسیاری از موضوعاتی که فروید به آنها پرداخت، هم رویکرد هرمنوتیکی-معنوی را بر میتابد و هم رویکرد پوزیتیویستی-پراگماتیستی را. در چنین مواقعی مترجمان …
پوشهٔ شنیداری سلسله نشستهای تخصصی خدایگانی و بندگی در پدیدارشناسی روح هگل(۱) دکتر سید مسعود حسینی انجمن علمی فلسفهٔ دانشگاه اصفهان و کانون جهان ایرانی دانشگاه تهران-شنبه ۲۹ آذرماه ۱۴۰۴ #سمپوزیوم #پدیدارشناسی_روح 🌀https://t.me/ensan_zendegi
علم مدرن، در افق هایدگری، نه خطایی در فهم جهان است و نه دشمن حقیقت؛ مسئله در «نسبت» آن با هستی است. علم، جهان را میشناسد تا آن را قابل پیشبینی، محاسبهپذیر و مهارپذیر کند. این شناخت، کارآمد و درست است—اما درستبودن، هممعنای گشودگی به هستی نیست. در منطق علم مدرن، زمین و آسمان به «موضوع» تبدیل میشوند: منابعی برای اندازهگیری، میدانهایی برای تبیین، دادههایی برای کنترل. طلوع و غروب، خطای دید است؛ رعد، تخلیۀ ال…
I do not know whether you have guessed the hidden link between 'Lay Analysis' and 'Illusion.' In the former I want to protect analysis from physicians,and in the latter from priests.I want to entrust it to a profession that doesn't yet exist, a profession of secular ministers of souls [Seelsorger], who don't have to be physicians and must not be priests. نمیدانم آیا پیوندِ پنهان میان «روانکاویِ غیرپزشکان» و «آیندۀ…
With the mistranslation of Freud's thoughts to make them fit better into a behavioristic frame of reference-a frame of reference completely alien to psychoanalysis-it is understandable that in the English-speaking world his concepts were not only examined in this light but found wanting. If behavioristic studies could prove Freud right, his would no longer be an introspective psychology that tries to elucidate the da…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ensan_zendegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@manehaghighi · 95,891
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 September 2026
@psyshortmovies · 34,438
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@psy_azmoon · 34,771
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@ketabb_khaneh · 39,369
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انسان و زندگی” (@ensan_zendegi), 1,124 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ensan_zendegi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.