Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

.𝗛𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗘𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝗳

@enneagrammcf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004467189126
TypeChannel
Username@enneagrammcf
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 16 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/enneagrammcf

Growth

626 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:4662no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:2062first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1053.1%
avg views ÷ 62 subscribers
Avg views / post
653
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.793%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total13,059
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54020824461140681071923.8%
custom 53304553667129894521822.5%
custom 53390716079796683791620.0%
custom 5303094195949442381911.3%
custom 526943062883042177356.25%
custom 530558941303462380545.00%
custom 531897034069563852945.00%
custom 526952111949638782133.75%
custom 533005277795350195822.50%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC16 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я НЕНАВИЖУ СП7 И ДЖЕКСА.... ПРОСТИТЕ 𑊁 #take | @Enneagramtake_bot ۫

custom 53055894130346238052custom 54020824461140681072custom 53189703406956385291custom 53390716079796683791

Signed дельта

9 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC21 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @VeeComicsShowPhoto

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Рт пост! 🍓-Опять мою любимую роль заняли! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ 🤩-Хочу слушать или даже участвовать в озвучках! 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ 🤩🤩-🔠накомо? Тогда приглашаю в канал по озвучкам комиксов и диалогов 📺 🔠ee Comics Show !🙂🙂 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠. 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠: 1.Поучаствовать в кастингах и возможно занять роль🌼 2. Послушать и предложить свои любимые комиксы°🫧 3. Просто приятно пообщаться🤩🤩 ~•~• 🤩🤩-Приходи! Скорее все

Signed Sherri | NS #18

9 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @proxyvpnconfPhoto

🤩 ִ ︵ 🧪 ┊ ֺ 𝐯𝐩𝐧 ִ 𝓌𝓌 🎀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝖕𝐫𝐨𝐱𝐲 ݄ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓 ◝ ︶ִ ⏝ 💕 ׄ не можешь😀 найти хороший впн ⸝⸝ ︵ ִ ݃ ᅠ ◟ или прокси для телеграмма 😻 ⏝ ִ︶ 🎀 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ💋 ݄ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 ֺ 𝖘𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑡 ִ 𝖓𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 ✨ ֺ ︵

Signed Sherri | NS #18

9 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @boomtypingsPhoto

🎀welcome to boom typings ! 🥹 🥹 здесь мы тайпим персонажей из разных фд and more ☂️ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ админы : 🌟🌟 даша сх5 лэфв 🌟🌟 эстр сх7 влэф tags▫️mp▫️boost

Signed Sherri | NS #18

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @so6nationPhoto

🥹Social six Duty 🥹 Для этого подтипа характерна страсть к долгу , понимаемая как чрезмерная ответственность, которая не даёт им расслабиться, а также поиск установленного порядка, который служит им ориентиром для успокоения тревоги. 🥹 Знакомо? Тогда вам сюда mp > adm > rules 🙂

Signed Sherri | NS #18

9 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC21 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @urfavsp2Photo

ㅤ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍 🌟 🤍🤍🤍🤍 (к)анал, где вы можете поделится своими любимыми персонажами сп2 💘 ㅤ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 @favkanon

Signed Sherri | NS #18

9 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @matteotype

🥹δᥱᥴᥰ᧘ᥲᴛн᧐ᥱ ᥲн᧐н ᴛᥙᥰᥙρ᧐ʙᥲнᥙᥱ࣭ - ۪○ 🥹ʙᥲᥴ ᥰρᥙʙᥱᴛᥴᴛʙуᥱᴛ 🪽 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🪽🪽💜💜💜💜💜💜 🤩💟💟 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 💟🪽κᥲнᥲ᧘ ᥰ᧐ᥴʙящён ᴛᥙᥰᥙρ᧐ʙᥲнᥙю 🥹 ᥙ ᴛᥙᥰ᧐᧘᧐ᴦᥙяʍ, ᥲ ᴛᥲκжᥱ ᥲдʍᥙн 🥹 ᴛᥙᥰᥙρуᥱᴛ 🤩 δᥱᥴᥰ᧘ᥲᴛн᧐🤩 🤩💟💟💟🤩💟💟💟🤩💟💟💟

Signed Sherri | NS #18

8 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC66 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Почему-то каждый раз когда я вижу сх4, встреча заканчивается тем что они на меня вечно агрессируют и преследуют 𑊁 #take | @Enneagramtake_bot ۫

custom 53304553667129894528custom 53030941959494423815custom 53390716079796683793custom 52694306288304217731

Signed 疼痛 𝓢𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧 𝔃𝙖̄𝙤𝙨𝙝𝙤̀𝙪ᵃⁿᵈₒₙₑ

5 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC99 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Не то что ненавижу, скорее очень отстранённо отношусь к СО/СХ2... Я понимаю, что такие люди порой бывают очень требовательными. Мне, как человеку, который не умеет показывать банальную благодарность, это сложно... Ну не очень, я порой могу не говорить «спасибо», ибо считаю это лишним, а СХ2 как раз очень нуждаются в этом. У меня был опыт с человеком СХ2, конечно, общение закончилось - я не смогла стать для него тем ч

custom 53304553667129894525custom 53030941959494423814custom 53390716079796683794custom 52694306288304217732custom 53189703406956385291

Signed дельта

17 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC498 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Кто вас больше всего бесит из сх🐼

  1. Сх124%
  2. Сх219%
  3. Сх311%
  4. Сх439%
  5. Сх57%
  6. Сх618%
  7. Сх720%
  8. Сх834%
  9. Сх916%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 54020824461140681074custom 53390716079796683792custom 52694306288304217731custom 52695211194963878211

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enneagrammcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTCAnonymous Poll138 voters

Кто вас больше всего бесит из сх🐼

  1. Сх124%
  2. Сх219%
  3. Сх311%
  4. Сх439%
  5. Сх57%
  6. Сх618%
  7. Сх720%
  8. Сх834%
  9. Сх916%

The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Poll123 voters

кто вас больше всего бесит из со😳

  1. со122%
  2. со223%
  3. со329%
  4. со438%
  5. со512%
  6. со610%
  7. со714%
  8. со814%
  9. со910%

The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

ктт вас бесит больше всего из сп😁

  1. сп116%
  2. сп239%
  3. сп312%
  4. сп415%
  5. сп512%
  6. сп615%
  7. сп729%
  8. сп819%
  9. сп917%

The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 103,065 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.𝗛𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗘𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝗳” (@enneagrammcf), 62 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enneagrammcf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.