Channel
@enikishoparchive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004400671410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enikishoparchive |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 13 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enikishoparchive |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 4 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 3 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 3 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
☺️ возьму...
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
☺️одарки на годовщину! Кого возьмете? Лично я Тиори или Нилу 🌟🌟
Будет интересно узнать, что вы выберете! 🌟
Произошла очень неприятная ситуация, которая описана в данном посте 🌟 вечная ссылка: tg://openmessage?user_id=8154368883 Пожалуйста, будьте осторожны и всегда проверяйте у кого заказываете или кого берете в качеры🌟
Рэйнбоу Дэш Фд: Млп Юз: @Dalia_sigma
Рин Фд: Вокалоиды Юз: @furina_top1
Нанами Фд: Очень приятно бог Юз: @dezdarnostlol
Эклер куки Фд: Cookie run kingdom Юз: @cielsbleus
Марин Китагава Фд: Эта фарфоровая кукла влюбилась Юз: @teeohhn
Харуки Судзумия Фд: Меланхолия Харуки Судзумии Юз: @miuorr
Цифер Фд: Хср Юз: @gekerufgk
Гань юй Фд: Геншин Юз: @POLION33
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @enikishoparchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
☺️ возьму...
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 15 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архив Качеров•” (@enikishoparchive), 4 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enikishoparchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.