Channel
@enigmariddler
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002480812868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enigmariddler |
| Description | По всем важным вопросам писать мне на почту: [email protected] Анонимные сообщения: https://t.me/anonimnaya_valentinka_bot?start=1187813562 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 22 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enigmariddler |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 50 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 50 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
276 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 170 | 61.6% | |
| 🤔 | 106 | 38.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2024 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— "Сегодня я создал коллаж из фотографий моих рук и лап неизвестного мне рыжего кота. Распечатка, как видите, немного пострадала. Это было связано с моей нервозностью в связи с неудавшимся ограблением аптеки. Мои подчинённые вконец обнаглели... Не могут ничего! Даже украсть ключи от шкафчиков с лекарствами, которые были мне нужны для загадки. Но теперь этот план отложен в долгий ящик! Я не могу использовать план, кот…
🤔11🏆7
— "Вас уже пятьдесят. Как мило. Вероятно, мне следует что-то сделать, чтобы закрепить ваш интерес ко мне".
🏆16🤔7
— "Только не говорите мне, что никто из вас не понял смысла данной шутки... Жаль. Хороший юмор никогда не ценится по достоинству..."
🤔6🏆4
— "Глядя на то, как все развлекаются сегодня, я тоже решил не отставать. Итак, я люблю Ричарда Грейсона настолько, насколько люблю свои загадки".
🏆10🤔3
— "Родной, но такой мерзкий и грязный Аркхем... Дом, милый дом. Дом для душевнобольных, но я как раз подхожу под эту категорию. Хотя дом – это место, где тебя всегда любят и ждут. Тут вряд ли меня любят, но всегда ждут. Интересная загадка получается... Стоит над этим подумать. Ах да, меня снова кололи чем-то. По моим подсчётам я стану овощем на ближайшие 7 часов примерно через 3 минуты и 24 секунды. Так что у меня ес…
🤔13🏆8
12 февраля. Лес. Три часа ночи. Пара сотен километров отделяет это место от городской суеты. Здесь сосны похожи на великанов, а трава, кажется, намного зеленее, чем любой зелёный цвет на планете. На опушке около искусственного пруда стоит двухэтажная хижина. Такую можно увидеть в фильмах ужасов, где главный герой решает укрыться от остального мира. Обычно, примерно в такое позднее время, как сейчас, снаружи должна …
🏆11🤔6
— "Я немного изучил этот вопрос. Могу сказать, что роль омеги меня совершенно не устраивает. Как славно, что это всего навсего идиотский тест в интернете." Здесь ссылка на автора челленджа.
🏆15🤔6
— "Милый тренд. Счёл нужным его продолжить." Здесь ссылка на автора.
🏆14🤔5
Небольшое напоминание #ОтАдмина Просто хочу сказать, что за персонажами стоят админы, которые продумывают, пишут, рисуют и публикуют все эти посты. Мы стараемся для вас и хотим получать отклик, потому что без вашего отклика мы не можем знать, интересно вам то, что мы делаем, или нет. Грустно публиковать что-то, над чем ты думал несколько дней, и получать в ответ молчание, а потом гадать: подписчикам это неинтересно …
🏆10🤔4
— "Как вы извиняетесь перед человеком, если доставили ему некоторые неприятности?" Наверное, большие. (Пожалуй, даже очень большие...)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔10🏆4
— "Иногда приятно заскочить к Освальду на пять минут, чтобы покурить и послушать, как он снова на что-то жалуется. То ли мне, то ли своим птичкам."
🤔10🏆8
— Был рад провести этот эфир для вас. Ещё увидимся. https://telegra.ph/Konec-translyacii-01-05 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
🏆10🤔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @enigmariddler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
— "Как вы извиняетесь перед человеком, если доставили ему некоторые неприятности?" Наверное, большие. (Пожалуй, даже очень большие...)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2024 to 10 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,157,078 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Загадочник Чёртов-Человек-Дождя” (@enigmariddler), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enigmariddler.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.