Channel
@enhaspa_ofc
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001569818636 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enhaspa_ofc |
| Description | Mpps. : kami tidak menerima mpps. Bot ofc : @Enhaeveofcbot Menfess: @enhaevemenfess |
| Created | 28 September 2021 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enhaspa_ofc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 58 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 58 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 September 2021 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (28 September 2021 β 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | β |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 10 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Sticker, posted without a caption
ΰ¨β‘βΉ Χ Φͺ β happy birthday Yang Jungwon! happy adding age, and congratulations on becoming an adult human being, which starting from your current age you will definitely meet more problems in your life. And how can you stay strong and be able to solve all the problems yourself, relying on your own strength and ability without the help of anyone other than prayers from your parents. Living at an age that is mature enoβ¦
Photo, posted without a caption
Happy New Year Enhaeve π€
Sticker, posted without a caption
π§π§ββοΈ ΰ£ͺ Λ πΊπππ π―π½πππ !! long time no see right? i want to tell you a ππππππ π€« just for two of us, psstt. . . !! Κβ’ββ’Κ come here get cα₯£Ooser. . . π¬π΅π―π¨π¬π½π¬ is lπking for a new member for the second time and with a new theme, so cπππ right??. . . yeahh there's an cπππ admin and a ππππ members π΅π΅βπ«, if you interested just read the π₯π¨πππ¦ and wear an ππ§π§π₯πππ¨π§π so i can see you in base, SEE YOU THERE !! π¦π¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
free tag: @shiimjaeyunnn @iJungwwon @shilahamahikaru @enhddn @jjongseongoark @mahaasiiswii
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @enhaspa_ofc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 937,215 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@enhaspa_ofc named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππππβ (@enhaspa_ofc), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enhaspa_ofc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.