4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 928–930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 11:59
930
+2
15 Aug 2026, 04:18
928
-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:03
929
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:37
929
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 930 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
17 (13 May 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
201
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
78 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
27
34.6%
👍
25
32.1%
💘
9
11.5%
❤
8
10.3%
✍
4
5.13%
😁
4
5.13%
🤯
1
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 247%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как всегда летом была надежда отдохнуть, но занятия идут полным ходом и не хватает времени писать что-то сюда, хотя желание такое есть. Я немного в кризисе жанра от того что не очень понимаю, что вам было бы интересно читать?
Отметьте пожалуйста ниже, какой контент вам был бы интересен
Не удивительно, что английский стал языком торговли и договоров. В нем есть интересный инструмент, помогающий избегать двусмысленности.
Если вы поранили палец, надо бы уточнить чей именно (I injured my finger), как будто иначе человек не поймет. Ну на самом деле поймет, но лучше уточнить. На всякий случай, чтобы не было потом вопросов.
Чисто русская фраза (читайте с характерным акцентом)
Wife asked me to get pony. …
На уроке вчера разбирали глагол humblebrag (скромно хвастаться)
humble ➡️ скромный
to brag ➡️ хвастаться
to humblebrag ➡️ пожаловаться на какую-нибудь вещь с целью привлечь внимание к тому что она у вас есть.
Вот целый мини-диалог:
– Ugh, I hate flying business class! 😫 The seat reclines so far back I can never finish my movie before I fall asleep.
– Business class? Fancy.
– Yeah... it's actually kind of annoying,…
Много путаницы возникает с наречиями. Разбираемси.
Сегодня обсудим наречия частотности. В следующем посте разберем наречия манеры или образа действия.
🔘Наречия частотности / adverbs of frequency
- описывают, как часто происходит действие.
- отвечают на вопрос "как часто"
- стоят перед смысловым глаголом, но после глагола be.
🔘Перед смысловыми
She always yawns when I tell a story.
always = наречие частотности
yawns…
Завтра делаем Speaking Club
🧠 19 июня (пятница): Living abroad — romanticized vs real
Делимся историями переезда в другую страну. Что хотелось и что получилось?
12:00 Москва / Тель-Авив
17:00 Бали
19:00 Владивосток
➖➖➖
Уровни: B1-B2/C1
Стоимость:
1000р -1 встреча
2500р -3 встречи
🔗Записаться
Небольшая статья о навыках второго порядка, которые отвечают в том числе за обучаемость и скорость освоения иностранного языка. Это к вопросу о том, почему у одних уровень повышается максимально быстро, а у других медленно. Есть конкретный набор навыков, который прокачан у первой категории.
🔗https://t.me/thenewdark/110
Интересно будет преподавателям и тем, кто застрял в изучении языка.
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
💬 5 июня (пятница): Dream job vs. dream life
Что важнее — работа мечты или жизнь мечты? Говорим о карьерных компромиссах, work-life balance и о том, как изменились наши приоритеты с возрастом. Делимся, от чего пришлось отказаться и стоило ли оно того.
➖➖➖
💬 12 июня (пятница): Conditionals Review
Вспоминаем все Conditionals разом, практикуем. Разобраться в условных типах предложений, значит выйти н…
Так, какое-то злое волшебство работает против нормального проставления ссылок в предыдущем посте. Возможно заговор 🧌. Пока пост убрал, разберусь с ссылками, перезалью.
Вчера встречались разговорным клубом и общались про тинейджеров. Каждый раз это моя финальная встреча недели и я очень рад, что собралась такая замечательная группа. Обсудили собственные подростковые загоны, поговорили о том, с какими вызовами встреча…
🔥5
Signed Dmitry Kamil
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @english2go. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 247%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English2go” (@english2go), 930 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english2go.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.