Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Девки любят инженеров.

@engigirling

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

749subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002891979123
TypeChannel
Username@engigirling
DescriptionАмбассадор инженерной деятельности. Рекламы нет!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/engigirling

Growth

7497 Aug 2026, 17:27 — 749 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:01 — 749 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:278 Aug 2026, 02:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 748–750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:01749no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:27749first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
269
Videos
484
Links
410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 15s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4235.9%
🥰2218.8%
custom 52267488372756413871210.3%
❤‍🔥1210.3%
custom 5226635265455433220119.40%
🤔86.84%
65.13%
🌚43.42%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 23 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,260 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ладно. Я сдаюсь. Есть внятные комментарии?) Хорошего вечера)

🔥5🤔3

23 Jan 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,110 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера в комментарии принесли ребят, которые про атомную энергетику показывают и рассказывают, работают, и красивые фотки делают. В очень приличной форме, кстати, можно даже детям показывать. Они сами вам все слова расскажут..)

🔥3🥰2

23 Jan 2026, 10:37 UTC911 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сферические коровки программирования. Термин происходит из шутки о физике, который при получении задачи увеличить производство молока, начинает с того, что говорит: «представим сферическую корову в вакууме», иллюстрируя, как ученые и инженеры иногда создают очень упрощенные модели, которые лишают реальную сложности, чтобы сделать проблему математически или концептуально приемлемой.

🔥4

23 Jan 2026, 06:44 UTC859 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Математики опять посчитали эти наши отношения, на этот раз реальную стоимость эмоциональных компромиссов. Эмоциональные вознаграждения варьируются в зависимости от индивидуальной чувствительности к качеству отношений, в то время как эмоциональные издержки возникают из-за различий в том, как люди воспринимают усилия, необходимые для поддержания этого качества.

2🔥2

23 Jan 2026, 04:40 UTC705 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Мотивационная пятница, доброе утро.

custom 52267488372756413875🔥2🥰1

22 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC786 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Всему на свете, даже самой невообразимой ситуации всегда есть рациональное объяснение..) Хорошего вечера))

custom 522663526545543322011🌚4❤‍🔥3🥰1

22 Jan 2026, 12:45 UTC655 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Есиро Накамацу. Данный тролль утверждает , что мозг лучше работает в состоянии гипоксии, спит по 30 минут в сутки и имеет 3000+ патентов, один веселее другого. Клац (статья на английском/ его сайт

🔥1

22 Jan 2026, 09:45 UTC611 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Внеочередное четверговое объявление. В срочном порядке разыскиваю удаленку, в виде основной работы/подработки/нескольких подработок. В чем она будет состоять, - абсолютно неважно, если это вписывается в текущее законодательство всех видов и форм и не требует бесконечно находиться на телефонной трубке (тишины в доме нет и не будет еще очень длительный период). Что я умею - грамотно чесать языком, быстро печатать, до

❤‍🔥94🔥1

22 Jan 2026, 07:25 UTC570 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кусочек из книги с неплохой идеей. Хороша ли остальная книга, - неизвестно.

🔥1

22 Jan 2026, 04:40 UTC534 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Врываемся) Доброе утро!

🔥16custom 52267488372756413877

21 Jan 2026, 15:27 UTC692 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PBTN_MediaPhoto

Заметил несколько случаев неверных толкований деклараций о соответствии, где указаны российские мобильные устройства с адресами производства заграницей. ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, ОТКРОЙТЕ ГЛАЗА, ПРЕЖДЕ ЧЕМ ПРО ЭТО ПИСАТЬ В декларациях и сертификатах в ФГИС Росаккредитации есть вкладка Сведения о таможенном декларировании, где иногда напротив "Продукция, ввезена для проведения исследований и испытаний в качестве проб (образцов) для

🤔5

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @engigirling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,036,200 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Девки любят инженеров.” (@engigirling), 749 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engigirling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.