Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alexandra.eng.buff: Хороший English

@engbuffcourse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

176subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732130567
TypeChannel
Username@engbuffcourse
Description💪Помогаю комфортно разговориться на B1-C1 ❤Мои уроки и консультации http://alexandra-korzhova.tilda.ws/page46409941.html 👉Моя коллекция уроков BCC http://alexandra-korzhova.tilda.ws/page57201401.html @alexengbuff- для связи
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/engbuffcourse

Growth

1767 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 176 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:00 — 176 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:028 Aug 2026, 14:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:00176no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:02176first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 176 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.6
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total304
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,520
Videos
175
Links
258

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
450.0%
🔥450.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ДАВНО МЕЧТАЛА ОБ ЭТОЙ ВСТРЕЧЕ В четверг, 20 августа, с 22.00 до 23.00 по Москве проведу лексическую встречу, о которой давно мечтала. К которой я собирала лучшую связанную лексику полтора года. На которой мы будем пархать и кружиться над лучшими book-related chunks в лексических заданиях. На тему которой я готова говорить всегда. ❤️КНИГИ❤️ Необходимый уровень B2/C1 Стоимость участия 1500 рублей. Приходите на н

5 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

What's your favourite place to read?

  1. Baths and tubs0%
  2. Trains33%
  3. Under duress17%
  4. Late at night83%
  5. A nook with my dog (cat)17%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

How often do you nose around the bookshelves in a brick-and-mortar bookstore?

  1. Oh, this is totally my favorite scene.40%
  2. Once in a blue moon.40%
  3. I only so digital.20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Do you salvage books from the hallway on and off?

  1. Can't be bothered to pick up someone's waste paper.75%
  2. This is a great way to stumble upon smth really worthy.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Do you tend to relegate books to second hand bookshops?

  1. Every once in a while.20%
  2. Not really.80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Do you often commission books from Ozone and Amazon?

  1. More often than is good for me.50%
  2. I do have the presence of mind to stop myself.50%
  3. I mostly take books out from libraries.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Do you tend to have a few books on the go?

  1. Always.86%
  2. It's not really my idea of reading.14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ОДНО ОЧЕНЬ БОГАТОЕ СЛОВО Kниги — это, наверное, единственная возможность прожить не одну, а сотню других жизней: побыть в шкуре других людей, увидеть мир их глазами, почувствовать то, что иначе просто не пережить. В английском языке есть ёмкое прилагательное/обстоятельство, которое вбирает в себя ВЕСЬ АБЗАЦ ВЫШЕ. (live) Vicarious/Vicariously - проживать чью-то жизнь, приключения, опыт вместе с другим/за другого че

2

2 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

СОВПАДЕНИЕ? НЕ ДУМАЮ! Знаете такое: выучили новое слово, и оно вам везде начало встречаться! Надо же, как совпало, думаем мы. На самом деле, это изученный frequency illusion- феномен со сложным названием Baadar-Meinhof phenomenon. Это не магия, эти слова и раньше, конечно же, встречались. Только теперь они зарегистрированны в памяти, внимание их фиксирует, тело кайфует. Каждое касание- улучшение языка. Каждое улуч

🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 22:48 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

И ЕЩЁ ИНТЕРВЬЮ ПРО КНИГИ Читаю этот канал https://t.me/UlitkaiKit/261 для вдохновения и понимания, что происходит в мире детской литературы! Пачками складываю себе книги в избранное, а ещё узнаю вот такое неожиданное: Если говорить с точки зрения нейробиологии, важно понимать: мозг не «создан» для чтения. У него нет врождённой, готовой области или системы для этого.

30 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

МОЯ ПРЕЛЕСТЬ Обожаю книги. Читать. Нюхать. Заказывать. Рассказывать. Моя библиотека пополнилась ещё двумя томами. ❤️Good Inside by Dr. Becky Kennedy. Очень мне помогает в родительстве предложенная ей роль уверенного в себе пилота, который не поддается панике на борту😂. Писала о докторе здесь и здесь. ❤️Волшебные сказки с иллюстрациями Ивана Билибина. Что я знала о книжном шопоголизме до рождения дочери? Сейчас я с

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @engbuffcourse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

What's your favourite place to read?

  1. Baths and tubs0%
  2. Trains33%
  3. Under duress17%
  4. Late at night83%
  5. A nook with my dog (cat)17%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

How often do you nose around the bookshelves in a brick-and-mortar bookstore?

  1. Oh, this is totally my favorite scene.40%
  2. Once in a blue moon.40%
  3. I only so digital.20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Do you salvage books from the hallway on and off?

  1. Can't be bothered to pick up someone's waste paper.75%
  2. This is a great way to stumble upon smth really worthy.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

Do you tend to relegate books to second hand bookshops?

  1. Every once in a while.20%
  2. Not really.80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Do you often commission books from Ozone and Amazon?

  1. More often than is good for me.50%
  2. I do have the presence of mind to stop myself.50%
  3. I mostly take books out from libraries.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Do you tend to have a few books on the go?

  1. Always.86%
  2. It's not really my idea of reading.14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alexandra.eng.buff: Хороший English” (@engbuffcourse), 176 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engbuffcourse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.