Channel
@enfol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
679subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001176465761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enfol |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enfol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 679 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 678 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 677 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 678 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 171 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
90 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 82 | 91.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Want to make your project stand out? Try doing the opposite of everyone else. To flip something on its head means to completely change the usual way of doing things. 📍flip something on its head — to change something so much that it is the opposite of what it was before ▪️ The new boss took the old rules and FLIPPED THEM ON THEIR HEAD to make the company faster. @ohliad @svitohliad @enfol
👍3
Does your idea match the plan? Many learners forget a small word when they want to say that something is suitable. ❌ Your ideas do not fit with the plan. ✅ Your ideas do not FIT IN WITH the plan. To match a picture or a plan, you need to use both in and with. ▪️ We need to make sure the music will FIT IN WITH the calm mood of the dinner. @ohliad @svitohliad @enfol
👍3
You tell a joke at a dinner party. Nobody laughs. The room goes completely quiet. English has a heavy phrase for this exact moment. 📍go down like a lead balloon — to fail completely and cause silence or anger ▪️ I suggested we work on Saturday, but the idea WENT DOWN LIKE A LEAD BALLOON. Have you ever said something that failed this badly? @ohliad @svitohliad @enfol
👍6
Almost every learner makes this mistake when they want to say something is much less than expected. ❌ The exam was not near as hard as I thought. ✅ The exam was nowhere near as hard as I thought. You cannot just say "not near". When two things are completely different, English speakers use "nowhere near as" to show a huge gap. It is a stronger, more natural way to say "much less". 📍nowhere near as — not at all e…
👍5
In 2026, calling yourself FERAL is almost a compliment. 🐾 The old meaning is about animals. A FERAL cat once lived with people, then went back to the wild and turned wild again. No owner, no rules. Now young people use FERAL about themselves. It means wild in a fun way — loud, messy, full of energy, doing whatever you feel like. They call their late nights, their group chats, even their pets FERAL. 📍feral /ˈferə…
👍4
You have probably seen the phrase PERSONALITY HIRE on TikTok or LinkedIn — usually from someone joking about themselves. 😄 A PERSONALITY HIRE is someone a team keeps mainly for their warm, funny energy, not for their technical skill. They make the office a nicer place to be. The tone decides the meaning. It can be a small compliment — you make the team better. Or a soft insult — you don't really do much. 📍person…
👍4❤1
Any tool can write code for you. But when the app crashes at 2 a.m., the tool won't pick up the phone. You will. That is OWNERSHIP: taking full responsibility for a result, even when it goes wrong. In the 1970s, an engineer named LeMessurier realised his tall New York tower could fall in a strong storm — the wrong bolts had been used during building. He didn't blame the builders. He quietly fixed every joint, nigh…
👍3❤2
Here is a phrase that does exactly what it describes — it undervalues something. To SELL SOMEONE OR SOMETHING SHORT means to fail to recognise how good, capable, or valuable they really are. You give them less credit than they deserve. 📍to sell short — to underestimate the value or ability of someone or something ▪️ Don't SELL YOURSELF SHORT — your experience in this field is exactly what they need. ▪️ The criti…
👍2❤1🔥1
This phrase has nothing to do with teeth or fat — but it does have everything to do with good conversation. To CHEW THE FAT means to have a long, relaxed, informal talk with someone — the kind where you're not solving problems, just enjoying each other's company. 📍to chew the fat /tʃuː ðə fæt/ — to chat in a slow, easy, friendly way, often about nothing in particular The image is of old friends sitting together, …
👍3❤1
Four meanings in one verb — and most learners only know one of them. CUT LOOSE in English can mean four different things depending on context. Native speakers switch between them effortlessly. Learners often freeze. 📍to cut loose — to stop controlling yourself and behave freely, have fun ▪️ It was her last week before exams, so she decided to CUT LOOSE and go dancing. 📍to cut loose — to end a relationship or le…
👍4🔥1
These two verbs look unrelated. But they belong together — one removes you from the group, the other removes you from danger. 📍freeze someone out — to make someone feel excluded by being cold or ignoring them, often deliberately 📍spirit someone away (also: spirit off / spirit out) — to move someone quickly and secretly from a place, usually to protect them ▪️She noticed she was being frozen out — no one replied …
👍5
Three verbs about emotions — and all three can describe the same moment. When news hit that the beloved coach was leaving, the stadium went quiet. Then someone in the back cracked up — nervous laughter, the kind that spreads. Others choked up and couldn't speak. A few had been bottling up their frustration for weeks. Now it all came out at once. 📍crack up — to suddenly burst out laughing, often at an unexpected m…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @enfol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 94,571 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English as a Foreign Language” (@enfol), 679 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enfol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.