Channel
@endlesscaverna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001463612829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @endlesscaverna |
| Description | Сцена порожня, та крісла досі теплі. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/endlesscaverna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 90 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 90 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 787 |
| Reactions total | 57 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
113 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 19.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 10.6% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 10.6% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| 🤪 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Київ – це коли тобі на вокзалі кажуть, що морозива в кав'ярні нема, бо русня розбомбила склад; натомість пригощають лимонадом. Вперше під час ранкової хвилини мовчання ревів як віл із порожніми яслами. Попри це, попереду робота, робота й іще трохи роботи. Добре, що я ще в Місті: кожен ранок після ночі в ньому нагадує серцю, що воно живе. #мемуаразми
😢11❤🔥4
Спека. Хочеться розчинитися; надто хочеться Читати вірші, викравши їх зі снів. Місяцелика панно, світла пророчице! Нині вночі вкажи, чого не зумів: Може, ще є в мені час на великий задум! Може, ще є у гуркоті злих ночей Те, що ввійде у серце, владно-безвадне, І там заграє, загоїть і запече, Наче тавром – з натхненнів усіх натхненням – Ключ від шляху в серці думок і див?.. Спека. Благословення моє опівденне, Вийди д…
🔥7
І #вірші_стиха до нього: And as the reaping time approaches My paladin What are the fruits, what are the seeds? What are the crops and apples we're gathering What are the odds, what are the deeds? Didn't we make an oath? Didn't we stay up late? Was it an act of love? Was it just spite and hate? What if the story ends, Will there be something else? Is this the scent of myrrh? Is this the sound of bells? And if th…
❤🔥3
Тут давно був відсутній #звук. Відтак держіть. Всім доброго Врожаю.
❤🔥2
Питання до читачів, які пишуть: коли ви пишете історію, чи проживаєте всі події всередині себе, чи відчуваєте всіх персонажів? Бо в мене це десь так і відбувається. Я не просто уявляю собі, як кожне рухається – я буквально в себе в голові рухаюсь за них. А в вас як? Принагідно пропоную #чаю новоприбулим :)
Словом. Придумайте собі сновидіння. Я серйозно. Почніть придумувати щось, що могло присниться саму вам: ви ж себе знаєте краще за всіх, кому ж іще це придумувати?) Запишіть. Докладно. Що як виглядало, що на що було схоже, запахи, звуки, відсутність якихось речей, які є в дійсності, -- все, що характеризує саме ваші сновидіння. Зробіть це перед сном, і лягайте спати. Вранці дайте собі до години часу спокійно й ліниво …
🔥5👏2👎1
Вночі один із тих, хто я, дуже хотів їсти, тому #сни були переважно про добування їжі. Але мені подобається, як повертаються сни Якщо хочете, розкажу, як повертав собі здатність їх відтворювати в пам'яті після пробудження.
Сьогодні #сни йшли рясно. В одному сні я складав натальну карту комусь, і це, схоже, була не людина (не так, щоби я вмів це робити). В иншому був гральний стіл у круглій залі, повній дверей. До зали, виходячи з різних місць і світів, приходили різні істоти й сідали грати в карти. То з випаленого поля, то з якихось зал із ігровими автоматами, то з Інституту (хто знають, ті знають). Завжди ж за столом лишалося четвер…
❤🔥5
... Але оскільки ввечері я таки налаштував свої мізки на роботу зі сновидіннями (як у дитинстві, розкажу колись), – #сни таки снилися. Я був у летючому будинку з садом, що належали одному приятелеві. Крім мене й господаря будинку, там був мій покійний бро. І оскільки ми всі місяцями одна істота, летіли ми на зустріч із такими ж, як ми, і дорога наша була крізь власне тканину сновидінь. Ми приземлилися в #Міжземелля, …
🔥5
Коли сни довго не сняться, точніше, не тримаються пам'яті, – я сам собі придумую #сни й сам собі кажу: не тривалі, маленький брате, все буде добре. Ми ще побачимо з тобою далекі світи.
Зранку сонний мозок видав: танкістадори. Дуже сучасне слово, звісно. #груші
🤪5👍2
Зранку стався #шаманізм і я виловив колискову зі сну, прямісінько з #Міжземелля. Єдине – довелося її перекласти спершу, бо була вона початково російською. Поки перекладав, забув оригінал. Така історія. Зупинись, спочинь хоч трохи – Бо ж тобі потрібно спать! Будуть довгими дороги По розпечених степах; Буде небо неозоре, В синім небі буде знак – Він до тебе заговорить, Він розкаже, що і як. Та допоки ніч невидна І н…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @endlesscaverna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 977,464 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Безконечний квартирник” (@endlesscaverna), 90 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endlesscaverna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.