Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Encuestas ScS

Channel

Encuestas ScS

@encuestas307

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

496subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384189592
TypeChannel
Username@encuestas307
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 6 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/encuestas307

Growth

496499497.56 August 2026 — 499 subscribers6 August 2026 — 499 subscribers15 August 2026 — 496 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 496–499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:46496-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:46499no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:18499first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2021, 11:50 UTC≈4,230 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Que servicio usan?

  1. YouTube Music55%
  2. Deezer1%
  3. Spotify29%
  4. El botón ruso de telegram15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Oct 2021, 17:05 UTC≈4,240 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Vieron útil la función de saber quiénes leyeron tu mensaje en grupos chicos?

  1. Sí, me pareció curiosa y complementaria66%
  2. No, la verdad es algo que no tiene importancia17%
  3. Me da igual, mientras mantengan la app bien, todo chevere17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2021, 18:56 UTC≈3,920 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Creen que la nueva película de Spiderman tronará en taquilla a Avatar y Endgame?

  1. Definitivamente sí, colapsó al Internet42%
  2. Tiene potencial, pero dudo que truene en taquillas a esas películas32%
  3. ¿A poco saldrá una nueva peli de Spiderman?26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2021, 19:38 UTC≈3,300 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Lograron ver la luna de sangre, eclipse lunar y la súper luna?

  1. Sí, definitivamente35%
  2. No, la neta me pasé de largo durmiendo23%
  3. Quería verla, pero estaba nublado16%
  4. Ni me enteré que habría todo eso26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jan 2021, 19:52 UTC≈2,970 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

A pesar de todo, ¿sintieron que aprovecharon bien el 2020?

  1. Sí, aprendí nuevas cosas o mejore en otras53%
  2. Ni sí, ni no, lo sentí como otro año con algunas cosas diferentes24%
  3. Sentí que perdí o no aproveché el 202023%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Dec 2020, 21:58 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Si pudieras modificar tu vida entre estas dos formas, ¿Cuál eliges?

  1. Ser la persona más inteligente del mundo y todo el resto a un nivel inferior al tuyo85%
  2. Ser la persona menos inteligente del mundo y todo el resto a un nivel superior a tí15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Dec 2020, 19:08 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Cuál se llevó la peor decepción del público?

  1. Cyberpunk 2077 con sus bugs generales56%
  2. DLC Cayo Perico de GTA Online, por tener una isla inaccesible44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Dec 2020, 05:26 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Qué prefieres ser entre..?

  1. Un detector de mentiras humano imposible de eludir69%
  2. Un mentiroso imposible de detectar31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Dec 2020, 19:13 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Creen que las llamadas grupales saldrán en Diciembre?

  1. Sí, será el regalo de Navidad de Telegram62%
  2. No, las sacarán hasta 2021 con más novedades38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Dec 2020, 08:49 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Tienes que escoger entre una de estas opciones, pero si escoges la opción más votada no obtienes nada ¿Qué te arriesgas a escoger?

  1. Un millón de dólares31%
  2. Mil dólares13%
  3. Cura a cuqleuer enfermedad ahora mismo incurable39%
  4. Crear una nueva enfermedad donde tienes el control de quién vive o muere17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Nov 2020, 02:59 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Qué prefieres de estas dos opciones?, si estás en un grupo puedes decir el por qué

  1. Saber todo el conocimiento de un libro con tan solo tocarlo65%
  2. Aprender la habilidad o conocimiento de cualquier video con tan solo verlo completo35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2020, 22:29 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

¿Creen que el 2020 nos dé una nueva sorpresa mortal en Agosto?

  1. Seeeh, aunque ya nada me sorprende70%
  2. Nah, ya le está bajando el temperamento mortal30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @encuestas307. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Oct 2021, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll990 voters

Que servicio usan?

  1. YouTube Music55%
  2. Deezer1%
  3. Spotify29%
  4. El botón ruso de telegram15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Oct 2021, 17:05 UTCAnonymous Poll453 voters

¿Vieron útil la función de saber quiénes leyeron tu mensaje en grupos chicos?

  1. Sí, me pareció curiosa y complementaria66%
  2. No, la verdad es algo que no tiene importancia17%
  3. Me da igual, mientras mantengan la app bien, todo chevere17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2021, 18:56 UTCAnonymous Poll385 voters

¿Creen que la nueva película de Spiderman tronará en taquilla a Avatar y Endgame?

  1. Definitivamente sí, colapsó al Internet42%
  2. Tiene potencial, pero dudo que truene en taquillas a esas películas32%
  3. ¿A poco saldrá una nueva peli de Spiderman?26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2021, 19:38 UTCAnonymous Poll387 voters

¿Lograron ver la luna de sangre, eclipse lunar y la súper luna?

  1. Sí, definitivamente35%
  2. No, la neta me pasé de largo durmiendo23%
  3. Quería verla, pero estaba nublado16%
  4. Ni me enteré que habría todo eso26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jan 2021, 19:52 UTCAnonymous Poll332 voters

A pesar de todo, ¿sintieron que aprovecharon bien el 2020?

  1. Sí, aprendí nuevas cosas o mejore en otras53%
  2. Ni sí, ni no, lo sentí como otro año con algunas cosas diferentes24%
  3. Sentí que perdí o no aproveché el 202023%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Dec 2020, 21:58 UTCAnonymous Poll235 voters

Si pudieras modificar tu vida entre estas dos formas, ¿Cuál eliges?

  1. Ser la persona más inteligente del mundo y todo el resto a un nivel inferior al tuyo85%
  2. Ser la persona menos inteligente del mundo y todo el resto a un nivel superior a tí15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2020 to 5 October 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 953,451 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Encuestas ScS” (@encuestas307), 496 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/encuestas307.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.