Today was the date for the first of three injunction proceedings against Andrea Christidis. The judge stated that Andrea Christidis had not even begun to prove that my husband or I had falsified a guarantee or that I had made a deal with the public prosecutor's office. This is not an expression of opinion, but an untrue statement of fact intended to suggest that there was criminal conduct. According to the judge, thi…

Channel
News 2020 English
@en_2020news
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
182subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001239247465 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @en_2020news |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/en_2020news |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 182 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 184 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 186 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 188 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 188 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Dear friends, good news: the well know Austrian AUF1 has deleted the interview with Andrea Christidis on the subject of Reiner Fuellmich from YouTube due to “obvious false statements” (Stefan Magnet). Andrea Christidis had untruthfully claimed that my lawyer had confirmed that there had been no liquidity pass at the committee. She also untruthfully claimed that I had only paid in my liquidity reserve AFTER the charge…
Dear friends, the slander against me and the Committee continues. Andrea Christidis has now claimed in an interview on AUF1 that I transferred funds from the 1st Committee Company to my later Corona Committee Foundation. This is not true. The account of the 1st Committee Company was emptied on July 7, 2022 by unauthorized payments to the law firm Fuellmich (€ 29,750) and to the accountant in the amount of approx. €…
ATTENTION TODAY: The waiting room for today's online rally for the #ivetowar democracy offensive will open at 1:30 pm German time. Anyone can take part in the ZOOM rally. Here is the link to the participant ZOOM. After the rally (from around 3:30 pm German time), the internal ZOOM will remain open and participants can discuss with each other and with the speakers. Networking is our sharpest sword. Link for the live b…
Invitation to the online rally "ivetowar": It is time to counter warmongering with a diplomatic offensive. The war in the East must not be allowed to spread to the EU and the whole world. All bloodshed must be stopped immediately. No country is a pawn, no human being is a chess game figur of geopolitical and financial interests. We all have better things to do than bash each other's heads in. I would therefore like …
https://2020news.de/en/who-or-what-is-behind-the-reiner-fuellmich-dossier/
https://2020news.de/en/has-reiner-fuellmich-been-maliciously-deceived/
On the subject of summary proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court, for the sake of completeness I am publishing here the judicial notices of March 29, 2023, and June 23, 2023. The dismissal of the motions for injunctive relief filed in respect of these statements (english translation here) was ostensibly on the grounds of "self-refutation of urgency", but the court had already dealt with the content of the monti…
https://2020news.de/en/the-maori-tribunal-of-dr-reiner-fuellmich/
https://2020news.de/en/nord-stream-1-blast-it-was-a-mini-nuke/
https://2020news.de/en/the-maori-tribunal-of-dr-reiner-fuellmich/
Mr. Najadi, it would be nice if you and Ana McCarthy could publicly explain yourselves truthfully about the events surrounding your allegedly successful but, according to the record, futile lawsuits in New York, and not veer off into an apparent "war of the roses" with Ana McCarthy by tweeting, for example, "Sadly Ana McCarthy @Chanabassarah today chose to defame me with criminal allegations on Twitter where there i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @en_2020news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@en_2020news named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“News 2020 English” (@en_2020news), 182 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/en_2020news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.