🟠 رادیکالها علیه قالیباف و پزشکیان حتی در شعلههای جنگ جنگ شد اما مثلث رادیکالها در ایران بازهم دست از تخلیه کینه و عصبانیت شخصی خود از قالیباف و پزشکیان برنداشتند جریان رادیکال داخلی که همواره فریاد ادامه جنگ بر سر میداد، این روزها با سواستفاده سیاسی از تجاوز آمریکا به ایران، در حال حمله به شخصیتهای سیاسی از جمله قالیباف، پزشکیان و عراقچی هستند. این جماعت اما حالا که جنگ شده، نه تنها راه حلی ارائه نمیدهند، …

Channel
🌱امروز ایران
@emroozeiran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
77subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002343761291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emroozeiran |
| Description | فردای ایران بر آمد امروز ایران است #امروز_ایران را دنبال کنید دریافتیها: @ahmadpour45 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emroozeiran |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 77 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 77 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.79%
- avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 February 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 6 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 70
- Videos
- 52
- Links
- 265
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 43s
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🟡 بنبست ژئوپولیتیک و چشمانداز برونرفت ✍️ دکترعلی میرموسوی ۱۸تیرماه۱۴۰۵ تشدید تنشها بار دیگر به موج نگرانی از سرگیری جنگ دامن زده است. آمریکا که از دید بسیاری از ناظران به اهداف خود در جنگ چهلروزه دست نیافت، در تلاش برای تضعیف ج.ا. ایران و ایجاد اجماع جهانی علیه آن است. سفر ترامپ به ترکیه و شرکت او در نشست ناتو نیز در همین راستا ارزیابی میشود. ایران نیز برای حفظ تنگه هرمز، بهعنوان مهمترین برگ برنده راهبردی خو…
@emroozeiran
🟡 توهم قدرت و نادیده گرفتن واقعیت ✍️ فاضل میبدی اشعار گذشتگان گاهی برای امروز ما پندآموز و عبرت است. غرور و پندار قدرت چنان خیال برانگیز و فسون و فریبنده است که صاحب غرور میپندارد که بر همهٔ جهان سلطه و سیطره دارد و توهمش کار به دست خودش و دیگران میدهد [عالمی را یک سخن ویران کند]. غالب جنگهای تاریخ از سر غرور و توهمات برخاسته [است] به قول مولانا: وز خیلی صلحشان و جنگشان\ وز خیالی نامشان و ننگشان| میدانیم که می…
Video, posted without a caption
🟢 خدا سایه روس را کم کند! ✍️ مجید مرادی مهمان خبیث بلندپایه روس (مدودف) که چند روز پیش به ایران آمد سخن از سلاح مافوق هستهای ایران گفت و غرب را به بسته شدن باب المندب تهدید کرد. البته او که کشورش در زیر ضربات بی امان اوکراین به پالایشگاهها، بخش عمدهای از توان پالایش و صادرات نفتی اش را از دست داده است چارهای جز این ندارد که به هر قیمتی شده، آتش جنگ میان ایران و آمریکا را شعله ور کند. از همان لحظه که مدودف با ای…
دکترمجید مرادی استاد دانشگاه @emroozeiran
┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄-- بله و ایتا: @iraneemrooz @neveshtehha ┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄-- اینستاگرام @ahmadreza__ahmadpour ┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄-- تلگرام @pezhvakependar @neveshtehha ┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄┄┅══┅┄--
🟠 فرودگاه صنعا؛ آوردگاه جدید؟! ✍️ صابر گل عنبری [پژوهشگر، مترجم، روزنامهنگار] فرود نخستین هواپیمای مسافربری ایرانی در فرودگاه صنعا پس از ده سال و انتقال شماری از مقامات صنعا به تهران، در شرایط کنونی فراتر از یک پرواز معمولی، واجد پیامها و دلالتهای خاص خود در سپهر سیاسی منطقه و نشان دهنده بیپروایی و جسارتی است که پس از جنگ اخیر در رفتار و رویکرد منطقهای ایران بروز کرده است. ظاهرا جنگندههای عربستان تلاش کردن…
🟠 از نقد تورم تا تولید تورم ✍️احمدرضا احمدپور |تحلیلگر سیاسیاجتماعی| ۵تیر۱۴۰۵ 🔸️پس از توافق میان ایران و آمریکا، امید به کاهش تنشها در منطقه تقویت شد؛ این توافق امید جامعه به بهبود وضعیت اقتصادی و گشایش در زندگی مردم را افزایش داده است. خواستۀ طبیعی جامعه آن است که چنین گشایشهای بینالمللی، کاهش تورم، ثبات بازارها و بهبود قدرت خرید مردم را بهدنبال داشته باشد. رئیس بانک مرکزی نیز پس از امضای تفاهم میان دو کشو…
🟠 سپاه با مسیر معرفیشده ازسوی عمان برای گذر از تنگه هرمز مخالف است 🔸سپاه پاسداران میگوید عبور امن کشتیها از تنگۀ هرمز تنها از مسیری که از سوی ایران مشخصشده امکانپذیر است و مسیر دیگری که بدون هماهنگی با ایران اعلام شده، قابل قبول نبوده و یک ریسک امنیتی به شمار میآید. 🔸سپاه پاسداران تأکید کرده که با شناورهایی که بدون هماهنگی با ایران قصد عبور از این آبراه را داشته باشند، برخورد خواهد کرد. 🔸دیروز گزارش شد که عم…
🟢 نتیجه توافق ایران و آمریکا 💥کی بُرد کی باخت؟ ✍️احمدرضا احمدپور 🔸️دستاوردهای آمریکا از توافق با ایران ۱. بازکردن تنگه هرمز؛ ۲. پیشگیری از درگیری در تنگه هرمز؛ ۳. بازگشت بازرسان هستهای به ایران و خلع سلاح هستهای ایران. 💥دستاوردهای آمریکا درحالیاست که پیش از جنگ با ایران: ۱. تنگهٔ هرمز باز بود؛ ۲. در تنگهٔ هرمز درگیری نبود و امنیت برقرار بود؛ ۳. اساسا ایران سلاح هستهای نداشت و ندارد و بازرسان در ایران حضور داشتن…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @emroozeiran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 740,229 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@emroozeiran named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌱امروز ایران” (@emroozeiran), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emroozeiran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.