Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Empera

Channel

Empera

@emperanetwork

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001789512741
TypeChannel
Username@emperanetwork
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 23 February 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/emperanetwork

Growth

110111110.57 August 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 111 subscribers13 August 2026 — 110 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:35110-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:00111no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:17111first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 February 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6652.8%
👎3931.2%
🔥86.40%
👏43.20%
32.40%
🥰32.40%
💩10.8%
🤔10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2022 to 13 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Feb 2023, 06:00 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Hello everyone, we are starting to refund TERA coins. https://terawallet.org/dapp/235

30 Aug 2022, 13:35 UTC903 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Information for the Empera Community Our partners, educational platform for Russian-speaking blockchain developers Mbl.tech is running a web3 hackathon. At the hackathon there is also a track from Empera. Registration link In preparation for the launch of the hackathon there will be two meetings in Russian language. Links to meetings: 1. Topic: Case introductions, including Empera Time: 30 Aug. 2022 07:00 PM Mos

👍9👎3

10 Aug 2022, 23:44 UTC874 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Read our new Medium article on the basics of our technology and a comparison with some of the market players. We look forward to your comments on Twitter

🔥4👏3👎1

7 Jul 2022, 11:05 UTC885 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We haven't started marketing yet, but crypto enthusiasts themselves are already publishing an article about our POM technology (in Russian): https://hub.forklog.com/pos-vs-pow-proof-of-memory-pom/

👍6👎3🔥2🤔1

16 Jun 2022, 06:00 UTC871 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dear friends! We are pleased to announce our new partner, the Cellframe blockchain platform. A new parachain will be created in the Cellframe ecosystem with the support of our Proof-of-Memory consensus. The parachain will have the advantages that all blockchains of the PoM ecosystem can have: 1000pts bandwidth, commission-free transactions, JavaScript smart contracts. The parachain will be used for bridging with our

👍10👎2

11 Jun 2022, 13:19 UTC672 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We invite you to get acquainted with the first feedback about our new Proof of Memory (POM) consensus from an expert on blockchain technologies https://trunin.com/en/2022/05/ingenius-empera-blockchain-and-pom/

👍8👎2💩1🥰1

1 Jun 2022, 11:28 UTC805 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We have developed a fast and secure consensus that will determine our technological advantage. WP here: https://empera.network/files/PoM-ENG.pdf

👍5👎2

25 May 2022, 12:42 UTC678 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

For new shard projects, we have updated the license to use our blockchain code. Main theses: free use of the code and mandatory mention of EMPERA.NETWORK. The full text of the license is here.

👍5👎2

13 Apr 2022, 12:23 UTC≈1,030 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

We are excited to announce that in line with our roadmap, we have launched Private Presale Round. Empera price in this round - 0.10 $, Minimum request amount - 50K $ The round will end at 30.06.2022. WhitePaper: https://empera.network/files/EMPERA_Whitepaper.pdf Pitch-Deck: https://empera.network/files/Empera_Presentation_Eng.pdf Application for participation in the financing private round of the EMPERA project: ht

👍2👎1

6 Apr 2022, 12:38 UTC770 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

=EMPERA technology news= In the new version we will use the new POM consensus, which inherits reliability and decentralization from POW and high speed from POS. Thanks to this we will reduce the block confirmation time and improve the stability of the chains. More detail: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qAuKkk8NFw5ctZFm3y7RCMtRC_gLtX7IQzwVZr9BXWs/edit#heading=h.isz82xd8en6 Empera chat channel

👍4👎1🥰1

1 Apr 2022, 13:03 UTC360 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @terafoundation

TERA - EMPERA Swap News The exchange of Tera coins for Empera has been completed. A total of 233 million coins were exchanged. We congratulate all who have exchanged on a successful decision. Welcome aboard. Empera announcements Empera chat channel

👎1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @emperanetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,465 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Empera” (@emperanetwork), 110 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emperanetwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.