7% in physics wahala 🤦🏿♂️
❤3🎉2🤨1

Channel
@eminentlinks_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,509subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001732605932 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eminentlinks_official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eminentlinks_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 13,509 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 13,525 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 13,540 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 13,545 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 43.6% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7% in physics wahala 🤦🏿♂️
❤3🎉2🤨1
WAEC has activated its Irregularity Portal, where candidates can check whether they have been recorded for any examination malpractice. Visit:👉https://irreg.waecgh.org Steps: 1.Enter your Index Number. 2.Select your Date of Birth. 3.Enter your Year of Examination. 4.Click "Login as Candidate." If your status shows "No malpractice record uploaded for this candidate at the moment," it means there is currently no mal…
❤3💯1
Also, Please Know That Tracing Is An Ilegal Act, It Is Not Endorsed By WAEC. WAEC Never Does Tracing. It Something Illegal That Is Done To Help You Students. What Is Used To Document Your Details Is Named THE TRACING WHITE LIST. This Is The List That Has Been Used For Years . You Should Also Know That Tracing Is Done When Marking Is In Session. If You Want To Better Your Grades Then Tracing is the Best Way!! So T…
❤7👀2🐳1
Evidence of tracing WhatsApp 0207436359 Text on telegram @eminentlinkadmin Confirmed this right now This is one of my student called Boakye peter. Kindly check his exams paper. He traced only Science He trace only science 💯✅ I didn’t want to post but for the sake of those in thought and the fake dealers. I have all my previous candidates who did tracing scripts Follow the right channels WhatsApp 0207436359 T…
❤3🤯1
All core papers completed, you now have a good idea of where you stand.Whether you succeed or fail. You may, however, trace your papers regardless of how poorly you wrote. The procedure can assist you in obtaining a pass. This isn't anything frightening or enormous. Those who mark your papers are similar to your regular school teachers, as are those who mark and are paid. So paying them to give you grades isn't a hug…
🥰1
I wanted to post proof of previous years tracing but the rate how all the dealers copy my work is extraordinary and I can’t also take them out of my channel Let’s be ware of these scammers What ever I post they will copy and post same Text on telegram @eminentlinkadmin
👏2
If anyone tells you that WASSCE paper tracings aren't real, consider that person ignorant. Marking is solely done by examiners. No one has time for you if you wrote nonsense or performed poorly, but with tracing, we sometimes take new question booklets to write the answers and remark them. Do you know that examiners are not robots and are paid based on the papers they mark? Imagine giving them a token to award you …
❤1🕊1
Do you know something? Let's talk about paper tracing,Is best solution that will help you if you didn't perform well in your exams before your results are released? Yes it is possible and paper tracing simply means getting the location of your slips and pay the markers/teachers to make corrections on your behalf and remark your papers. When you trace your papers you will be good grades from. A1 to B3 I don't normal…
❤2🎉1
Remember if you fail English no university will admit you Good luck 💯💯💯
🙏6
Note: I am not active on WhatsApp at the moment. Kindly text me using this link T.me/eminentlinkadmin
🎉3
E-ICT (Practical). WASSCE2026 🇬🇭 *2nd Set starts at 11:00am*
⚡4❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @eminentlinks_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EMINENT LINKS 2026” (@eminentlinks_official), 13,509 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eminentlinks_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.