Волшебно. Я прямо представляю как это массово подключают множеству линейных и некоторым не очень линейным менеджерам. Ненадолго.

Channel
Эмин Алиев делится
@emin_sharing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
376subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002338163039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emin_sharing |
| Description | «Трусы никогда ничего не начинали. Слабые умирали в пути. Это значит, что остались только мы». Основатель Nike Фил Найт |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emin_sharing |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 376 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 376 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.7%
- avg views ÷ 376 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 92.8
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.73%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 June 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 835 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 722
- Videos
- 102
- Links
- 226
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 45.0% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 35.0% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @emin_sharing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🎬 Anthropic научили Claude Cowork перенимать навыки из скринкаста. Новая функция "Record a skill": включаешь запись экрана, проговариваешь вслух, что и почему делаешь, а Claude превращает демонстрацию в готовый skill, который потом можно запускать повторно. Находится в меню + в десктопном приложении, доступно на Pro, Max и Team. Раньше skill для Claude приходилось описывать текстом - шаги, исключения, логику принят…
❤2
Понравилось
ИИ станет главной политической темой …избирательного цикла 2028. Поэтому я тут придумал основные популистские (и, конечно, радикально бесполезные) лозунги для всех ведущих партий Ультралевые: - запретить увольнения, даже если люди бесполезны - минимум 1 сотрудник должен работать в компании за каждую стойку Рубина Ультраправые: - (как минимум, частичная) национализация ИИ лаб - запрет на выезд заграницу ИИ рисерчер…
😁3❤1
Netflix выкинул свой движок рекомендаций с множеством ML алгоритмов и заменил его на одну нейронку с генеративным ИИ Это довольно большой прорыв: ген ИИ считается слишком медленным для того, чтобы рендерить страницу или экран приложения. Criteo, Meta, Google - все так или иначе пытаются улучшить опыт пользователя с помощью сочетания ген ИИ и традиционных реко алгоритмов. Netflix оказался впереди всех. Полная стат…
❤2👍1
цитата дня: Warren Buffett on finding opportunities: “What gives you opportunities is other people doing dumb things. And I’d say that in the fifty-eight years that we’ve been running Berkshire, there’s been a great increase in the number of people doing dumb things.”
23го июля в рамках большого состава уважаемых людей буду рассказывать всю правду про выход на межнар. Только GTM часть: что работает и не работает. С чего начинать. Что делать когда упираешься в потолок. И причем здесь AI - куда же без него ) На примерах текущих (4dev) и прошлых (Meta, Criteo). Праздник платный, и он того стоит. Пароль на скидку: ALIEV10 https://heg.ai/venture-day-2026/?utm_source=Emin Aliev
А казалось бы, простой простой футбольный мяч... ⚽️ https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:groupPost:4376214-7482637035988631554/?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=ios_app&rcm=ACoAAAApQvsBi2VD_EfzXN_mdQAPnwrxXNOBbeg&utm_campaign=copy_link
Если на этой диаграмме заменить машинные роли обратно на человеческие: Orchestrator = Топ менеджер Advisor = Внешний консультант Worker A, B, C, D = Сотрудники то - где на этом орг чарте находитесь вы сейчас? )
но есть и хорошие новости
Очень прикольное про понимание ИИ гонки между США и Китаем: Америка ставит на то, что у интеллекта есть вершина и взявший ее первым заберет весь банк. Китай – на то, что интеллект подобен электричеству: вершины нет, есть сеть.
По-моему, это прекрасно
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @emin_sharing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эмин Алиев делится” (@emin_sharing), 376 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emin_sharing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.