Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for إِمَامُ المُتّقِینْ﴿؏﴾

Channel

إِمَامُ المُتّقِینْ﴿؏﴾

@emamt_ali

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001390735426
TypeChannel
Username@emamt_ali
CreatedBetween 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/emamt_ali

Growth

178183180.56 August 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 178 subscribers13 August 2026 — 180 subscribers20 August 2026 — 181 subscribers27 August 2026 — 179 subscribers4 September 2026 — 181 subscribers12 September 2026 — 183 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 15:57183+2
4 Sept 2026, 09:59181+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:08179-2
20 Aug 2026, 17:02181+1
13 Aug 2026, 17:29180+2
8 Aug 2026, 13:16178no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:30178first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2022, 10:00 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

┄┅━𖣐💖﴾﷽﴿💖𖣐━┅┄ الحُسٰامْ الڪاسِرْ عَلۍٰ مُنڪِر حَدِیث الطٰائِرْ ✍🏻مبحثۍ جامع وتخصصۍ راجع به حدیث طیر ➢گردآورۍ طرق ➢بررسۍ اسانید ➢نقل ڪلام علما ➢رد ونقد شبهات ♻️مطالعـہ در ڪانال 𖣐﴾@emamt_ali﴿━➵━➵┅┄

22 Jul 2022, 05:03 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

📌به نظر شما احادیث امامت امیرالمؤمنین﴿؏﴾ را به «50» حدیث برسانیم؟😍

  1. ❶حتماً برسانیم، اللّٰهُـمِّ زِدْ وبارِڪْ!🌹94%
  2. ❷همین حد ڪافیه،چون نواصب میسوزند...6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2022, 15:07 UTC≈6,580 viewsread 8 August 2026

الحُسٰامْ الڪاسِرْ عَلۍٰ مُنڪِر حَدِیث الطٰائِرْ﴿۲﴾ ✍🏻بررسۍ سندۍ «10» طریق حدیث طیر: 📕صحّت روایت سدۍ از انس 📘صحّت روایت یحیۍ بن أبۍڪثیر از انس 📕صحّت روایت یحیۍ بن سعید از انس 📘صحّت روایت عبدالله بن انس از انس 📕صحّت روایت عثمان الطویل از انس 📘صحّت روایت عبدالملڪ بن میسره از انس 📕صحّت روایت إبن ابۍانعم از سفینه 📘صحّت روایت حارثة انصاری از انس 📕حُسن روایت بریده بن سفیان از سفینه 📘حُسن روایت سعد بن ابۍوقاص 𖣐➸━━➵━━━➵

18 Jul 2022, 14:52 UTC≈6,590 viewsread 8 August 2026

┄┅━✺𖣐💖﴾﷽﴿💖𖣐✺━┅┄ الحُسٰامْ الڪاسِرْ عَلۍٰ مُنڪِر حَدِیث الطٰائِرْ «تواتر وصحّت حدیث طیر ورد شبهات» ✍🏻مقدمـــہ 𖣐➸━━➵━━━➵━━➸━┅┄ ا📕𖭅طرق انس بن مالڪ𖭅📕ا ❶اسماعیل سدۍ از انس ❷عثمان الطویل از انس ❸عبدالملڪ بن ابۍ سلیمان از انس ❹حسن بصرۍ از انس ❺ابراهیم نخعۍ از انس ❻عبدالملڪ بن عمیر از انس ❼نافع از انس ❽مسلم بن ڪیسان از انس ❾محمد باقر﴿؏﴾ از انس ❿میمون الرفاء از انس ⓫ابومڪیس از انس ⓬ابوجعفر سباڪ از انس ⓭ابوالهندۍ از انس

18 Jul 2022, 14:09 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 8 August 2026

﷽ ✍🏻خَتْـم ڪَلام از قدیم الزمان حدیث طیر خارۍ در گلو وشمشیرۍ در پهلوۍ اهلسنت بوده است. حدیثۍ است ڪه نه میتوانند اسنادش را تضعیف ڪنند،ونه میتوانند دلالتش را تأویل ڪنند؛وازطرفۍ هم نمیتوانند آن را قبول ڪنند ڪه درهم ڪوبنده وشڪننده بُت های قریش است. لذا برآمدیم ڪه با روشن ساختن قوت اسناد و ردشبهات حول حدیث،سستۍ بیت العنڪبوتِ سقیفه را نشان دهیم . ان شاء الله ڪه عزیزان با نشر این مبحث،به نصرت امیرالمؤمنین﴿؏﴾ بپردازند وخ

18 Jul 2022, 13:59 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026

┄┅━✺𖣐﴾﷽﴿𖣐✺━┅┄ ♨️5تحدۍ و5سؤال از منڪرین حدیث طیر♨️ 💢❶تحدۍ میڪنیم یکۍ از فضائل مزعوم ابوبڪر وعمر را بیاورید ڪه بیش از ۵۰ طریق داشته باشد.(نگردید،گشتیم نبود) 💢❷تحدۍ میڪنیم که براساس مبانۍ حدیثۍ معهود تواتر حدیث طیر را رد ڪنید. 💢❸تحدۍ میڪنیم ڪه امڪان تواطؤ بر ڪذب این عدد هولناڪ از روات حدیث طیر را ثابت ڪنید.(وخلافش ثابت شده) 💢❹تحدۍ میڪنیم ڪه حدیثۍ به قوّت وتعدد اسانید طیر، معارض حدیث طیر باشد. 💢❺تحدۍ میڪنیم ڪه در

18 Jul 2022, 13:56 UTC981 viewsread 8 August 2026

💡چند شبهه سست وجواب آنها💡 📌در برابر حدیثۍ به این قوّت واستحڪام،چیزۍ جز شبهه هاۍ سست نمیتوان مطرح ڪرد ﴿وَإِنَّ أَوْهَنَ الْبُيُوتِ لَبَيْتُ الْعَنْكَبُوتِ لَوْ كَانُوا يَعْلَمُونَ﴾ 1⃣شبهه: ابن تیمیه وابن‌ ڪثیر وابن الجوزۍ حدیث طیر را جعلۍ میدانند. 📌پاســـخ: از آنطرف نزدیڪ ۲۰ عالم هم معتبر میدانند؛اگر صرف ڪلام علما حجّت باشد مِن باب اولی ڪلام مصحّحین را حجّت میدانیم. اگر هرادعایۍ نیازمند دلیل است،پس دلیلتان را بر

18 Jul 2022, 13:55 UTC748 viewsread 8 August 2026

『💎』شَـرح حَدِیث طَیْـر ✍🏻گرچـه حدیث طیر مستغنۍ از شرح وبسط است لیڪن بدڪ نیست چند نڪته اۍ عرض شود،به این نڪات توجه ڪنید: ❶حدیث طیر صیغه تفضیل احب را بر "خلقڪ" اطلاق ڪرده ڪه شامل همه آفریده ها است.لذا اگر در بین جمیع مخلوقات کسۍ محبوب تر از امام علۍ﴿؏﴾ بود،خداوند وۍ را میفرستاد. ❷پس نشان میدهد ڪه حتۍ ملائڪه مقرّب نیز در مقابل امام علۍ مفضول به حساب مۍآیند. ❸علاوه بر انبیاۍ زنده مانند حضرت مسیح بن مریم وحضرت خضر﴿؏ـل

18 Jul 2022, 13:53 UTC742 viewsread 8 August 2026

✋🏻 میپرسیم: دلیل ضعف حدیث طیر چیست؟ میگویند: چون راوی آن ضعیف است ✋🏻میپرسیم: حالا چرا راوی ضعیف است؟ میگویند: چون حدیث طیر را روایت کرده! این سناریو شوخۍ ومزاح نیست،بلڪه کاملا مبنای محدثین اهلسنت در مقابله با حدیث طیر وبقیه فضائل امیرالمؤمنین﴿؏﴾ را ترسیم میکند. حافظ غمارۍ مۍگوید: «وضعف به خلائق ليس له على ضعفهم دليل سوى روايته» ذهبی به وسیله حدیث طیر مردمانی را تضعیف ڪرد ڪه جز روایت حدیث طیر دلیلۍ بر ضعفشان نیست!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @emamt_ali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2022, 05:03 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

📌به نظر شما احادیث امامت امیرالمؤمنین﴿؏﴾ را به «50» حدیث برسانیم؟😍

  1. ❶حتماً برسانیم، اللّٰهُـمِّ زِدْ وبارِڪْ!🌹94%
  2. ❷همین حد ڪافیه،چون نواصب میسوزند...6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2022 to 30 July 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إِمَامُ المُتّقِینْ﴿؏﴾” (@emamt_ali), 183 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emamt_ali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.