Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тут пишет Дёмина

@emailshow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,462subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327500423
TypeChannel
Username@emailshow
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/emailshow

Growth

1,4591,4621,460.57 August 2026 — 1,459 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,459 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,462 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,459–1,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:511,462+3
7 Aug 2026, 18:021,459no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:181,459first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 1,462 subscribers
Avg views / post
318
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held10 (22 June 202616 July 2026)
Views total318
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18767.5%
🔥4717.0%
❤‍🔥176.14%
😍134.69%
👀41.44%
👍41.44%
💯31.08%
👏10.361%
🥰10.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC318 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Классная статья с гипотезами на тему - Как поднять Open Rate письма

11🔥1🥰1

3 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC509 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Человек устал от ваших писем. И у него обычно есть всего два варианта: отписаться или нажать «Это спам». И оба для вас так себе. Если человек отписался — вы просто потеряли подписчика. Хотя, возможно, он совсем не хотел уходить. Он просто устал получать письма так часто. Если нажал «Спам» — ещё хуже. Это влияет не только на него. Такие жалобы постепенно портят доставляемость всей вашей базы. Чем их больше, тем чаще

18🔥12❤‍🔥5

2 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC510 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кому верить??? Уже пару месяцев мне на глаза попадается отчет GetCourse, где емейл на последнем месте в продажах. И даже Facebook в 3 раза обгоняет рассылку. Так было в отчете марта, тоже самое я увидела в недавнем летнем. И так обидно мне что-то стало. И пошла я к Артему Седову в Monitor Analytics просить сделать такую же выборку и посмотреть, что за фигня. И о чудо! Емэйл воскрес) Посмотрите насколько разные да

23👀4

30 Jun 2026, 13:26 UTC394 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Многие компании относятся к VIP-клиентам по принципу: — Спасибо за ваши 300 тысяч рублей. — Вот вам теперь такой же сервис, как всем остальным) Сегодня выступала на «Нейропродающей» и выделяла этот сегмент, как очень важный. Но про него забывают процентов 95 бизнесов)) Самые прибыльные клиенты не должны получать «обычный сервис». Они должны чувствовать, что компания знает, кто они. И это далеко не всегда про скидки

18💯3🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC286 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уже совсем скоро будет Белая Конфа в Питере. Я уже вовсю выбираю белый наряд - с этим у меня вечные сложности 😅 (я не очень люблю total-white). А вот презентация давно готова. Буду очень подробно рассказывать про реактивацию. Приходите 😉

11🔥3

26 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC380 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @firstwhitechannelPhoto

База есть, подписчики есть, письма уходят… а продаж почти нет Знакомая история для многих онлайн-школ: когда-то база хорошо покупала, а потом стала молчать. И непонятно, что делать — чистить, греть заново, запускать спецпредложение или просто смириться и идти за новым трафиком. На «Белой конфе» Светлана Дёмина разберёт тему: «Реактивация базы: можно ли её оживить? Пошаговая инструкция». Светлана: — email-маркетол

10🔥5

26 Jun 2026, 07:27 UTC332 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера на «Свадебку» в Новую Оперу ходили. Чем больше знакомлюсь с репертуаром Дягилева, тем меньше понимаю. Как человек, который показывал публике Стравинского, Нижинского и весь этот художественный авангард, смог стать настоящей поп-звездой своего времени? Сегодня многие считают такое искусство «слишком сложным». Может быть, проблема в том, что это мы разучились быть любопытными? Или слишком много всего авангардног

15

25 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC358 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, современное искусство всё чаще конкурирует не за красоту, а за силу впечатления. Но если зритель весь спектакль думает: «Как она висит на волосах?», успевает ли он услышать то, что хотел сказать автор? Или именно в этом и был замысел? Это был перфоманс-манифест «Русская красота». Так какая она, эта красота по-русски? Желание печатления, несмотря на боль?

11👍4🔥4

23 Jun 2026, 05:50 UTC423 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто скучал? Есть повод встретиться! 🚀 С 29 июня по 3 июля мои друзья из команды «Морошки» делают онлайн-конференцию «НейроПродающая». 5 дней практики. 20 сценариев, как внедрить нейросети в маркетинг и продажи — от контента и воронок до ИИ-агентов, которые закрывают до 90% задач в продажах. Сценарии, которые можно внедрить сразу: 🟡ИИ-агенты и нейросотрудники: что можно делегировать нейросетям - от подготовки высту

19🔥10👏1

22 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC389 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

До сих пор не могу поверить, что это произошло со мной. Я прилетела в Пермь на закрытие Дягилевского фестиваля. На концерт Теодора Курентзиса — человека, которого считаю одним из величайших дирижёров современности. И вот финал. Оркестр. Хор. Больше ста музыкантов. И еще столько же танцоров, выходят на сцену для поклона. Вдруг они начинают выводить из зала несколько человек. Вводят нас в центр огромного круга и про

51😍13❤‍🔥12🔥11

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @emailshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 374,852 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тут пишет Дёмина” (@emailshow), 1,462 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emailshow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.