4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 303–306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 20:15
303
-2
16 Aug 2026, 17:28
305
-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:49
306
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:01
306
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 303 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 May 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
112
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
88 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
40
45.5%
🔥
16
18.2%
❤
8
9.09%
✍
7
7.95%
🙈
6
6.82%
🤔
4
4.55%
🤡
3
3.41%
👎
2
2.27%
👏
1
1.14%
🙉
1
1.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я только что обнаружил вполне логичное, но всё-таки неожиданное поведение kill-ring.
1. Встаньте в начало строки.
2. Несколько раз нажмите [C-k]. Активная строка (точнее, несколько строк) будет перемещена в kill ring.
3. Перейдите в любое другое место и нажмите [C-y]. Вставлена будет не последняя вырезанная строка, а все строки, которые вы до этого вырезали, не сходя с места.
В одном из чужих init.el увидел красивое включение глобальных режимов через хуки:
(use-package flycheck
:pin gnu
:ensure t
:hook (python-mode . flycheck-mode)
(after-init . global-flycheck-eglot-mode))
До сих пор есть люди, которые упорствуют и вместо :config для включения режимов используют :init. Что ж. У них всё меньше аргументов.
Релиз, мои чюваки, но есть нюанс. Релиз у меня на работе. Поэтому книгу особо редактировать некогда, а энтузиазма на книжку про техписенье не хватает. Поэтому, пожалуй, я буду писать свои заметки про это прямо сюда.
Расскажу про свой сетап, вдруг кому-то будет интересно.
Я работаю в Debian Trixie, здесь Emacs из коробки, и нет виндопроблем.
Сама сборка Emacs у меня из репозиториев Debian, пакет emacs-pgtk, который…
Много лет пользовался [F3] и [F4], которые привязал к replace-string и replace-regexp, но сегодня решил убрать эти привязки и использовать простые емаксовские интерактивные поиск и замену:
[M-%], он же [Alt+Shift+5]: query-replace, замена обычной строки.
[C-M-%], он же [Ctrl+Alt+Shift+5]: query-replace-regexp, замена регулярного выражения. Кстати, заметили, насколько сложное сочетание? С одной стороны, его не нажмё…
А как обычные люди делают rebase? Я вот так:
git rebase another-branch
В Magit ещё проще: [r e another-branch]. RET специально добавлять не стал, чтобы было видно разницу в количестве нажатий клавиш.
А если интерактивно со squash? Обычно сначала считают коммиты:
git log --oneline
Потом уже rebase:
git rebase -i HEAD@<N>
Тем временем Magit после нажатия [r i] автоматически показывает историю ветки. Переходим к нуж…
Что делает нормальный человек, чтобы посмотреть статус Git? Открывает панель Git в VS Code. Пишет команду:
git status
Что делает пользователь Emacs? Запускает Magit.
Что делает обычный человек, чтобы обновить статус Git? Ничего, VS Code всё показывает автоматически. Ещё раз пишет:
git status
Пользователь Magit просто нажимает [g] в буфере Magit.
Как обычный человек создаёт ветку?
git branch new-branch-name
Польз…
Давно ничего не писал про Magit. Давайте вспоминать.
1. Базовая настройка. Добавьте в init.el:
;; 📦 TRANSIENT
;; Встроенный пакет, который нужно обновить, чтобы нормально работал MAGIT.
(use-package transient
:pin gnu
:init
(unless (alist-get 'transient package-alist)
(package-upgrade 'transient)))
;; 📦 MAGIT
;; https://magit.vc/
;; Magic + Git + Diff-HL.
;; Лучшее средство для работы с Git.
(use-packag…
Три уровня закрытия буферов:
VIRGIN: [C-x k], то есть по одному буферу за шаг. Медленно и используется не очень часто.
CHAD: IBuffer, с помощью [d] ставим метку на ненужные буферы, [x]. Если нужно закрывать буферы в массовых количествах, то вполне себе эффективный способ.
GIGACHAD: [C-x p k], подтвержаем [y]. Вы же работаете над всем в рамках проектов с помощью Project или Projectile? Нет? Почему? Настоятельно рек…
А знаете какой функцией Emacs я пользуюсь буквально каждый день?
Не, kill-ring и whitespace-mode само собой. Я про более интересное.
Закладки!
Да, я сделал себе несколько закладок.
Во-первых, закладка на init.el.
Во-вторых, закладка на asciidoc-ts-mode. Я над ним иногда работаю.
В-третьих, закладка на папку с исходниками Emacs. Я их иногда читаю, чтобы понимать, как устроены режимы и всё такое.
Так вот, закладки…
Куча времени прошла с момента отказа от MELPA и MELPA Stable. Только GNU ELPA и NonGNU ELPA, только хардкор!
Emacs внезапно стал невероятно стабильным и предсказуемым. Это скучно и отвратительно!
👍6❤1👎1🤡1🙉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @emacs_for_technical_writers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GNU Emacs по-русски” (@emacs_for_technical_writers), 303 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emacs_for_technical_writers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.