Channel
@elzdragon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
178subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622407632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elzdragon |
| Description | эльжбета и дракон. во имя хтони, полярных вечеринок и жутких болот ✨️ сегодня: квир-захват власти в Минратосе, завтра: полярная экспедиция для связи: [email protected] или в сообщения канала :З |
| Created | 22 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elzdragon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 178 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 178 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (4 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 216 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
72 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 18.1% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 15.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5447381161242299131 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5769164985846471588 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5447580658178235698 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5444867557402128949 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| custom 5775960762275074434 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.39% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот так ты однажды случайно проходишь мимо фестиваля, решаешь заглянуть, — бах, и ты опекаешь двух собак и катаешься то в приют по три часа в одну сторону, то одним днём из Казани в Москву (мы не шутили, когда сказали, что Яшма — самая дорогая женщина в нашей жизни) 👀
❤9
Прежде чем мы начнём заносить творческие новости, мы занесём пушистые!! Так что если у господ московских вдруг нет планов на завтра, но есть желание почухать кошковых и пёпс, то завтрашний фест в Люблино — для вас 👀 Я (Эльжунечка 💅) буду там весь день с самой дорогой женщиной в нашей с Драконом жизни, Яшмой (Люпин тоже будет, но с другой сопровождающей, так что познакомиться с бубликом — и не только с ним — тоже мож…
custom 57691649858464715885
Нас очень долго не было, потому что здоровье и полярная жижа нанесли ответный удар, но пока атаракс не закончился, можно жить и творить 🍺
🔥9
Год без вонючки. Ужасно его не хватает 💔
😭13
а я тут то и не оглашал Кароче На бублефест с мерчом я не поеду (немного ту мач дорого для меня) но, поеду на него просто так погулять и,вероятно, заехать на полку с не бубловским. А бубловское маркетов подождёт. По артам меня жёстко убил покрас на крайней Эджевской штуке, но я заборол проблему, оч нравится эта штука, хыхыкаю с неё как скотина, но из-за неё других артов вообще нет, даже комикса Но добавились новые …
❤6
Мы всё забываем репостнуть, но если вы вдруг помните прозрачные закладочки по "Нашим мёртвым сказкам", которые рисовал БК, то да, теперь они эволюционировали ещё и в стикосы 😌💜✨️
🥰5
А авантюра наша такова, что мы стали опекать сразу двух замечательных пёпс, Яшму (невероятно послушная и совершенно очаровательная собачка с взглядом Эдварда Литтла и любовью показывать, как хорошо она знает команды, которые даже не нужно произносить) и Люпина (невероятно умный пёс, выступает личным тренером выгуливающего, он ещё совсем молодой, так что шило в жопе имеется), с которыми познакомились на WOOF-фесте (ша…
❤🔥6
Глупый хюман занял кошечнико место, и кошечка недовольна этим фактом, но кошечка очень довольна хюманом, даже несмотря на то, что от него пасёт псинами, поэтому посидит с ним 🙏🏻 Обычно если мы некоторое время что-то не постим, это значит, что мы ввязлись в какую-то авантюру. Ну или попали в кошачье окружение... 😳
🥰6
Channel photo updated
Добрейшего вечерочка, коллеги. У нас грядут кое-какие изменения, коллеги 😈 🫠Во-первых, у нас есть новые супер-модные реакции 👀 Возможно, позже мы пожертвуем какими-нибудь жабовыми — о горе! — и добавим кого-нибудь из драгонаги. А ещё мы медленно, но верно делаем паки эмозди для наших ориджей, но уже для оформления постов ✨ 🫠Во-вторых, у нас есть новый канал, доступный по старой ссылке. Мера была в некотором роде вы…
custom 54473811612422991316custom 54475806581782356984🦄1custom 54448675574021289491custom 57759607622750744341
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @elzdragon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,114,707 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“эльжбета и дракон | рябиновые бусы | 18+” (@elzdragon), 178 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elzdragon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.