Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π™šΛ™ π’šπ’”π’†π’'𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕 𝒖𝒑𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 .˚

Channel

π™šΛ™ π’šπ’”π’†π’'𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕 𝒖𝒑𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 .˚

@elyupds

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

289subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454941010
TypeChannel
Username@elyupds
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elyupds

Growth

2872892887 August 2026 β€” 287 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 287 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 289 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 22:05289+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:19287no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:50287first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
10.0%
avg views Γ· 289 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (23 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total58
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

3 lng nafix ko, the rest puro inco pass. pag may rereport kayo icheck nyo muna pass para wala na aberya sa fixing, madedelay lng kayo lako nyan paki reply nlng ako guys at don sa di pa nagrereport makikisend na.

6 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026

may pang replace na sa spotify guys! 15 pcs lang too. uunahin ko po mga naunang nagreport okay. auto ignore sa mga nag send sa dm :) since almost sainyo puro own acc pinurchased either provide kayo new acc or ako magprov if hindi nagwork sa current acc okii?? start nako magfix

31 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

massive wipeout sa spotify ph! reminder lang: kahit pa yan ay ph at straight billing, carded parin sya meaning hindi LEGALLY PAID gets?? VOIDED: di nagchange pass, di nagvouch within 24 hours. indicated yan sa rules, di gagana sakin excuses nyo. send reports sa nakabilog sa picture sa taas ha. ang report form nasa pinned post, iclick nyo yon. SINCE MASSIVE WIPE OUT EXPECT 3-7 DAYS OF FIXING! .

26 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC256 viewsread 8 August 2026

for hbo reports naman po, according kay maker, tomorrow po drop ng replacements

26 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC239 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

done na refunds na naka note sakin at mga nagsend ng refund forms nila

26 Jun 2026, 03:00 UTC161 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

update sa refunds na sesendan ko later hapon. yong email sa left ay mga for replacement po. sad to say super unstable na ni prime now idk why, di nmn ganto past accs ko. but then po hope you understand if may gantong shortcomings sa mga accounts. we cannot tell when pede maging unstable ang prems since its cheaper + it’s from bm. so sana maintindihan nyo na once bumili kayo here. u should not expect too much sa mga a…

25 Jun 2026, 03:58 UTC149 viewsread 8 August 2026

noted po sa reports sa prime kakareplace ko lang shuta bat ang unstable nya now 😫

24 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC149 viewsread 8 August 2026

di aq nakapag update uli, pero noted po lahat ng reports nyo today. hbo, prime, gpt refunds, ms365. tomorrow po aq ulit magreplace. wala papo drop ang maker po kaya wala pa mafix. settle kopo tomorrow gpt refund thank you po!

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @elyupds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 289,723 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™šΛ™ π’šπ’”π’†π’'𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕 𝒖𝒑𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 .Λšβ€ (@elyupds), 289 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elyupds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.