3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,153–1,155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 00:22
1,153
-2
18 Aug 2026, 06:14
1,155
no change
18 Aug 2026, 02:45
1,155
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47m 08s
Average length
23m 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
363 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
108
29.8%
❤
107
29.5%
🍾
66
18.2%
👍
30
8.26%
❤🔥
17
4.68%
☃
10
2.75%
🏆
10
2.75%
👌
7
1.93%
👏
4
1.10%
✍
3
0.826%
🐳
1
0.275%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2024 to 4 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eltexperthub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 December 2024 to 4 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
От CELTA к CPD будущего?
Привет, Катя на связи 👋
Несколько дней назад я делала опрос об изменениях в CPD в последние годы. Многие учителя написали, что, вполне очевидно, пандемия изменила формат, кроме того, уход международных программ и, в целом, онлайн дали много других возможностей. В материале Cambridge White Paper 2018 года авторы пишут о том, что CPD эффективно, если придерживается модели INSPIRE: impactful, n…
Групповые обсуждения или повесть о рыбьих глазах.
Что может быть лучше чем обсудить с группой студентов интересную тему, подискутировать о важном и одновременно потренировать спикинг?
Вот только насколько наше групповое обсуждение реально групповое?
Не страдаем ли мы Fisheye Syndrome?
Jennifer Gonzalez в своем блоге (хайли рекоммендед)пишет об этом так:
It’s a condition that impacts our perception, as if we’re lo…
Вы видите разницу между rules and restrictions?
Лишь один из этих компонентов по мнению Carol Read является особенно важным в процессе обучения Young Learners. (вот тут можно поискать остальные)
Для меня rules понятие более объемное и менее негативное чем restrictions. Любые правила предполагают не только запреты, но и то, что следует делать на уроке, в то время как restrictions вызывают скорее желание сделать назл…
Коллеги, я веду еще один канал про преподавание Методика&all_my_jazz в нем чуть больше меня и чуть меньше про сложное.
🤩 Заходите поболтать.
Сегодня говорим про обучение Young Learners))
А с февраля я запускаю серию вебинаров про обучение детей) подробности будут на канале.
🤩🤩🤩
Коллеги на фото помогают мне сочинять выступление к онлайн конференции. 🤓
Буду рассказывать про преподавание в группах. Точнее про classroom management в онлайне и potential pitfalls.
Препод в группе это как хороший дирижер — точно знает в какой момент дать слово трубачу или пианисту, как не превратить концерт в какафонию, но и не задушить при этом джазовую импровизацию, кому незаметно протянуть ноты, чьи струны по…
Спасибо тем, кто пришел сегодня 🎄 Запись эфира тут, поговорили о жизни и о состоявшихся в этом году проектах, новом опыте, планах на следующий год. Будем очень рады в комментариях послушать, что интересного было у вас и чем запомнился 2024 год 🌠Поделитесь, пожалуйста и всех с наступающим 2025!🎄🎄🎄
Эфир завтра в 15:00 Мск.
Подведем итоги года.
Поговорим о
- сипиди
- работе в оффлайн школе
- IATEFL
- PhD и морских черепахах
- о чем-нибудь еще)))
Приходите, приносите вопросы.
Женя и Катя
Motivating teens - am I doing things right?
Нашла интересный материал - чеклист от Герберта Пухты (на сайте www.herbertpuchta.com еще много другого крайне полезного), а в этом чек листе около 50 очень правильных вопросов - отвечать на них можно, проставляя галочки ✅
Вопросы о том, что я делаю или не делаю, чтобы уроки с подростками были более успешными.
Было бы интересно поделиться в комментариях, у кого-то будут …
Do you have a special approach to decorating your Christmas tree?
Yes22%
No33%
Is it December already🫣45%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍾3👍1
Signed JK
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eltexperthub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2024 to 4 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@eltexperthub named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@adventurenglish named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Muscat English | IELTS, TOEFL + репетиторы, преподаватели, студенты @muscatenglish · 58,913 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Everything English / IELTS / Newspapers / Magazines/ Economist @itsallinenglish · 86,726 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ELT Expert Hub” (@eltexperthub), 1,153 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eltexperthub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
