Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

البناء الإسلامي

@elsouhaib

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

849subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378722267
TypeChannel
Username@elsouhaib
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elsouhaib

Growth

848849848.56 Aug 2026, 17:35 — 848 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 848 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:21 — 849 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:357 Aug 2026, 17:21
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 17:21849+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:46848no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:35848first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 849 subscribers
Avg views / post
284
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total5,672
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3525.7%
💯3223.5%
😁2014.7%
🤣1914.0%
1511.0%
😢53.68%
🤬53.68%
🙉32.21%
🤡21.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC125 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

حتى تعلموا مستوى غباء هؤلاء يقول قبل خلق الزمان يا بهيمة كيف الزمان له بداية وهناك قبل ؟ أنت تفهم معنى قبل ؟ اه نسيت الجهمية عندهم أين لا تفيد المكان فعادي قبل لا تفيد الزمان

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

مولود السريري أحد شيوخ أبي عمر الباحث وهو جالس يزندق في اعتقاد أهل السنة طبعا لا تستغرب إذا وافق أبو عمر الباحث على هذا الكلام وقال لك نعم هذا اعتقاد أهل السنة

😁2

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC153 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ايش أخبار كتاب النقادي الذي سيرد فيه على الحدادية؟ مش كان المفروض ينشر في معرض الكتاب في تركيا من 4 سنوات؟

😁8

3 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC238 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

وليد السعيدان خرج ورد على محمد بن شمس الدين والخليفي وشتمهما وووو لأنه حسب كلامه خالفوا منهج العلماء جميل طيب يا شيخ وليد أين ردك على تجهمات فايز الكندري؟ ألم يخالف تقريرات العلماء في مسألة اللفظ؟ طيب أين ردك على العميري ألم يخالف تأصيلات كل علماء نجد؟ طيب أين ردك على النقادي، أليس خارجيا حسب منهجك؟ أين ردك على العابث، ألم يهبد في دين الله أشد الهبد؟

💯161

2 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC163 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @almaqdisy_al7anbaliPhoto

أخوك المخلص : حسن الحسيني 🥺

😁7🤣5🙉3

2 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC246 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

أنا تحت أقدامك يا ملكتي

😁3

2 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC348 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

البشير المراكشي يدرس في معهد يدرس فيه جهميان. الأول السريري جهمي بهيمة قلل الأدب مع الصحابة ومع ابن مسعود وسب الدارمي وانتقص منه. والبهيمة الثاني البردوني الذي أصل لمسألة جبل أحد صحابي وشتم أئمة السنة وفي الأخير يحاربون من يطعن في العلماء وكذا

8

2 Aug 2026, 00:41 UTC176 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @elcnaaPhoto

يا ايها الشرجاوي الهالة القدسية الكهنوتية التي تحيطون بها من تنسبونهم الى العلم سقطت العلم الذي يصون صاحبه هو ما كان متصلا بالكتاب والسنة والسلف اما المحاضرات العاطفية لم يعد لها قبول لا كهنوت في الاسلام وما أفسد الأمة في نهاية مجدها الا أن كل من نسب الى العلم استحق الاحترام والتقديس ووالله لم يكن هذا دأب السلف الصالح فسلفنا كان يقدس الوحي لا الاشخاص وكل شخص ينال احترامه وقدره بقدر تعظيمه واتباعه للوحي وان كنت تسمي

💯5

1 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC278 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

كثير من المدجنة يستدلون بالذهبي، ويقولون الذهبي هو ممثل طريقة أهل السنة في التعامل مع العلماء. فالرجل يقول:" وَلَوْ أَنَّ كُلَّ مَنْ أَخْطَأَ فِي اجْتِهَادِهِ - مَعَ صِحَّةِ إِيْمَانِهِ، وَتَوَخِّيْهِ لاتِّبَاعِ الحَقِّ - أَهْدَرْنَاهُ، وَبَدَّعنَاهُ، لَقَلَّ مَنْ يَسلَمُ مِنَ الأَئِمَّةِ مَعَنَا، رَحِمَ اللهُ الجَمِيْعَ بِمَنِّهِ وَكَرَمِهِ" اتاهى من سير أعلام النبلاء. لكن المشكلة أن نفس الذهبي هو الذي قال في ترجمة

3💯3

31 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC399 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

كل يوم قناة جديدة يظهر فيها شخص يقدم محتوى بعيد عن العلم الشرعي ليتكلم عن محمد بن شمس الدين

👍7

31 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC311 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

يعني مافيش بيان ضد أشعري مثلا؟ بيان ضد صوفي مافيش؟

👍7🤣1

31 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC330 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

قسما بالله عامة الناس مستواهم في التفكير تحت الحضيض هذا المفروض من المثقفين والنخبة الغبي لا زال يعتقد أن هناك انتخابات وأنك كشخص حقير أصحاب السلط والمال سيعطونك فعلا القوة والسلطة للتغيير

👍4🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elsouhaib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,066,759 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فقه النفس / مكاني
@makanyworld · 189,122
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“البناء الإسلامي” (@elsouhaib), 849 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elsouhaib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.