Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇳 🇪 🇵 🇦 🇱 ɴᴇᴡs

Channel

🇳 🇪 🇵 🇦 🇱 ɴᴇᴡs

@elpacho_bro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

380subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765849269
TypeChannel
Username@elpacho_bro
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elpacho_bro

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

380385382.57 August 2026 — 385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 385 subscribers14 August 2026 — 384 subscribers22 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 September 2026 — 380 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 379–386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 18:57380-1
22 Aug 2026, 20:44381-3
14 Aug 2026, 15:34384-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:48385no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:16385first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3118.7%
🔥2313.9%
👍2112.7%
👏2012.0%
🥰169.64%
🤩95.42%
🎉84.82%
custom 539314561989845171063.61%
custom 539556209305323434063.61%
💔63.61%
custom 528962110258521365442.41%
❤‍🔥42.41%
😈31.81%
custom 525820379477208585421.20%
custom 539132431324678129621.20%
custom 526940383682444005210.602%
custom 539536498411911954910.602%
custom 539538689704226230510.602%
😍10.602%
🤝10.602%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 14 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elpacho_bro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 January 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,270 views104 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏19🔥1817👍17🥰16🤩9🎉8

19 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC143 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🈴vip bred ...есть , тачки ...есть девушки...есть даже космос не с чем не сравнимый... ---а--есть--К⃒ А⃒ Т⃒ Е⃒ Р⃒ настоящий ,,,катер, когда управляешь катером..бля вы когда нибудь управляли катером?????...если нет , ьо обязательно попробуйте...$$ 🈴как вам объяснить,. Катер это то , что летит по жесткому ..вода ведь на скорости металл..когда ты управляешь катером , каждый удар он жестокий можно сказать, . Катер встре

custom 52582037947720858541custom 53913243132467812961custom 53931456198984517101

14 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC145 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌒vip bred Уютно так купаться в своём одиноком море , кому то ..что то доказывая и думая . Что себе . Здорово там на горизонте частиц дней , парусом маячить . И надеятся на эту жизнь. Что она рано или поздно буркнет голосом Алисы... круто бы , но не бывает. Люди сложные киборги им , что то кажется мерещится , они надумывают себе ,, быть несчастливым ( ой ).. И тусуются в своих жизнях , немного гордо

2🤝1custom 53955620930532343401

7 Jun 2026, 18:14 UTC258 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 Vip@bred Самые дальние дороги, кажутся иногда такими чужыми.. В окнах города где ты мелькаешь двух ногой тенью, ты не нужен. Ни одна рекламная вспышка к тебе не захочет, да и ты к ней не потянешься... Единственная реклама которая тебя может заинтересовать, это место точнее, виджет в котором ты можешь находиться. В котором ты можешь быть вдвоём с кем нибудь, ну например с ,, ночью,, Кстати ночь очень преда

💔1custom 52896211025852136541custom 53953649841191195491

9 May 2026, 19:24 UTC203 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

📌🈴Ду- Маю , все же надо поздравить , масштабом . Народ 9 мая один на всех , они за ценой не постояли. Наши , наши деды и бабушки.. .......круто же жить и знать в тебя не стрельнут , хотя стрельнут но это бандит, какой ..... С большой дороги, ...а у них без вариантов , ....сообщает вероломно ...фашистская Германия .. .....это какого во , это как идёшь себе за молоком и бац напали , напали враги на железных танках с

🔥2custom 53955620930532343402❤‍🔥1custom 53953868970422623051

7 May 2026, 19:02 UTC83 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Vip@bred 06.03.2025 Совершенно не важно какой ты кусок в отдельно взятом моменте. Либо ты трусливый кожаный , мешочек либо пьешь колу ту , с настоящими листьями коки. Твои поступки соизмеримы твоим внутренним принципам...и вот когда ты понимаешь , что принципы остались в воде ржаветь и ты не можешь их поднять. Нет сил, возможно викинг твоей души умер ....умер и ты узнал об этом последний.. и живёшь , ходишь с пуст

🔥2👏1custom 52582037947720858541custom 52896211025852136541custom 53955620930532343401

18 Apr 2026, 19:49 UTC118 views6 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Единой правды не существует, пойми это. Каждый из нас склонен считать, что видит явления такими, каковы они есть в действительности, однако дело обстоит совсем не так. Мы видим мир не таким, каков он есть, а таким, каковы мы сами, – или же таким, каким мы настроены его видеть. Открывая рот, чтобы описать, что мы видим, мы в результате описываем самих себя, наши представления, нашу правду. У каждого человека своя пр

3custom 52694038368244400521custom 52896211025852136541custom 53931456198984517101

11 Apr 2026, 20:02 UTC100 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Vip@bred Уже не новые люди встают подходят к окнам и словно Итальянцы вдруг кидают оранжевые апельсины в окна. Кидают много, упруго подражая Итальянскому обычаю... Не могу сейчас вспомнить суть. Люди швыряет апельсины наряжая улицу в радостные тона..... Тихо подходит радость от сделанного и притаившись за плечами народа, глазеет в окно. А там апельсины. Иногда радость спрашивает народ в лице, парня с большого

1custom 52896211025852136541custom 53913243132467812961custom 53955620930532343401

27 Feb 2026, 18:08 UTC156 views3 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

🟥 МНЕ это надо было, словно хорошим словом , напомнила ..что я хороший...не дурной ... мне и надо было то ...светом освятить ,яи загорелся ..я как тот кораблик как меня назови.....Так я и поплыву.. А людям другим кто за меня за спиной ...пишет говорит , гадости.. Как я вас таскал по сусекам вашей глупости , так и буду. Да не исссохнет чернило на резюме к вашему личному делу - жвачное, жвачное ужасно жлобящее..

3

6 Feb 2026, 13:41 UTC286 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️❤️❤️❤️ ㊞

custom 53931456198984517104😈1

Signed PARAD🌖X

4 Feb 2026, 01:54 UTC176 views7 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

🆎🆎🆎❤️🆎🆎🆎🆎 .. Ничего не происходит, не спеша маленькая лошадка несет свою ношу.... Она бы ее сбросила давно - но потерять статус маленькой лошадки несущей ношу для нее конец всей её жизни. . маленькая лошадка сокращенно МЛ без ноши ... Потерян смысл и собственно жизнь подсказывает суицид. Мл- приходит домой , по привычки ищет во дворе ношу , а вдруг... Но нет.. Нигде ее нет , пусто ... . какое все таки безрассудство

5👍2

Signed PARAD🌖X

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @elpacho_bro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇳 🇪 🇵 🇦 🇱 ɴᴇᴡs” (@elpacho_bro), 380 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elpacho_bro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.