3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 205–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:23
207
+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:00
205
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:53
205
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1236.7%
avg views ÷ 207 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.195%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
10 (16 November 2025 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
2,560
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
76
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مهلت ارسال آثار تا تاریخ ۳۰ مردادماه ١۴٠۵ تمدید شد!
بیصبرانه منتظر دریافت آثار شما هستیم.
📧 ایمیل ارسال آثار: [email protected]
📌 شیوهنامهی ارسال اثر
📌 ستونهای ثابت نشریه
〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰
📰 کانال نشریهی علمیدانشجوییفرهنگی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@eloquence_ut
🇫🇷 کانال انجمن علمیدانشجویی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@uteheran_fr
این روزها دلها خستهاند و شاید نوشتن، فانوسی باشد افروخته در ژرفای این شبِ سنگین.
در اِلوکانس، ستونها فقط بخشهای یک نشریه نیستند؛
پناهیاند برای دلهایی که میخواهند بگویند، اگر نغمهای ناگفته در دل دارید، اینجا جایی برای شنیدهشدنِ آن است. 🥀
@eloquence_ut
با پوزش از همهی دوستانی که (آغاز/commencement) را برایمان معنا کرده بودند، نشریهرا با مضمونی دیگر آغاز خواهیم کرد : (ذرات زندگی/La vie, goutte à goutte)
باشد که این آغاز، ادای احترامی باشد به فرصتِ بیتکرار زیستن.
بیصبرانه منتظر دریافت آثار شما هستیم.
📅 مهلت ارسال آثار: ۲۰ اسفند ۱۴۰۴
📧 ایمیل ارسال آثار: [email protected]
📌 جهت آگاهی از جزئیات مربوط به قالب، ساختار و محتوای آثار، لطفاً شیوهنامهی ارسال ا…
به ازای هر از دست دادن، قسمی از آدمی نیز از دست میرود. سوگ، ترک خوردن بخشی از هویت است؛ بخشی نهادینه در عمق جان. پس سوگ، دلتنگی صرف نیست؛ بلکه فرایندی برای بازتعریف خود است. در سوگ، نوشتن، سرودن و هرشکلی از ثبت کردن، ابزاریست برای برون ریختن درد. ما به دنبال واژهها میگردیم برای فریاد زدن دردهایمان. که تنهاییِ ترکخوردگیهای شیشهٔ وجودمان را در کنار هم تنهاتر کنیم. ما در خلأ سوگ، به ریسمان کلمه چنگ میاندازیم بسان…
〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰
📰 کانال نشریهی علمیدانشجوییفرهنگی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@eloquence_ut
🇫🇷 کانال انجمن علمیدانشجویی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@uteheran_fr
هر نشریه از صداهای مختلفی شکل میگیرد.
در اِلوکانس، هر ستون مسیریست برای روایت، اندیشه و خلاقیتهای شما.
ببینید کدام مسیر، مسیرِ شماست. 🍂
〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰
📰 کانال نشریهی علمیدانشجوییفرهنگی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@eloquence_ut
🇫🇷 کانال انجمن علمیدانشجویی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران
@uteheran_fr
با خوشحالی اعلام میکنیم که نشریهی علمیدانشجوییفرهنگی اِلوکانس در نخستین شمارهی خود، از تمامی علاقهمندان، هنرمندان، نویسندگان و پژوهشگران دعوت میکند تا آثار خود را با محوریت «Le commencement / آغاز» برای ما ارسال کنند.
📅 مهلت ارسال آثار: ۵ بهمن ۱۴۰۴
📧 ایمیل ارسال آثار: [email protected]
📌 جهت آگاهی از جزئیات مربوط به قالب، ساختار و محتوای آثار، لطفاً شیوهنامهی ارسال اثر را مطالعه فرمایید.
با الوکانس …
نشریهی «اِلوکانس» (Éloquence)، نشریهی دانشجویی علمیفرهنگیِ انجمن زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران، در راستای تقویت فعالیتهای پژوهشی و گسترش تعامل در حوزهی زبان، ادبیات و فرهنگ فرانسه، از دانشجویان توانمند و علاقهمند برای همکاری در بخشهای مختلف دعوت به عمل میآورد.
بخشهای مورد نیاز:
• ویراستاری فارسی
• ویراستاری زبان فرانسه
• گرافیک
• صفحهآرایی
شرایط همکاری:
• علاقهمندی به فعالیت در نشریه و توانایی کار …
به همّت انجمن علمیدانشجویی زبان و ادبیات فرانسه دانشگاه تهران،
با خشنودی و افتخار اعلام میکنیم که نشریهی دانشجویی علمیفرهنگیِ زبان و ادبیات فرانسه، با عنوان «اِلوکانس» (Éloquence)، فعالیت رسمی خود را آغاز کرده است. این نشریه با هدف گسترش اندیشه، تبادل فرهنگی و ایجاد فضایی سازنده برای گفتوگو میان دانشجویان و علاقهمندان به زبان و ادبیات فرانسه شکل گرفته و از این پس، به دو زبان فارسی و فرانسوی منتشر خواهد شد.
ام…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @eloquence_ut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 220,462 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Éloquence” (@eloquence_ut), 207 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eloquence_ut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.