Channel
@elmanpashaev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
445subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001807733508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elmanpashaev |
| Description | Правозащитник Президент Благотворительного фонда «Пашаев Фонд» Главный редактор «Пашаев ТВ» |
| Created | 19 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elmanpashaev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 445 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 445 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
210 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 97 | 46.2% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 31.4% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 8.10% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.38% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 15 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚪️Вопрос о том, с какого момента нужно исчислять срок исковой давности, вновь оказался в центре спора между бизнесменом и застройщиком. 🔵Предприниматель Гребенев долгое время пытался доказать своё право на землю под бизнес-центром, которую застройщик использовал в коммерческих целях (парковки, киоски). В 2022 году экспертиза подтвердила ценность участка, и Гребенев потребовал взыскать с застройщика 3,3 млн руб. за п…
🤔4❤3👍2
Встретил старого знакомого, Григория Вдовина. Мы не виделись целых четыре года — как же быстро летит время! Эльман Пашаев. Подписаться 9️⃣
👍8🔥2
К предыдущему посту.
🔥9👍6🤪2🙈2❤1💊1
Из серии «внезапно»
👍16🙉2
🪖Танковый батальон 5-й ОМСБр в бою: мужество и сталь на пути к победе! 🇷🇺Наш танковый батальон вновь доказал, что никакие преграды не в силах остановить нас в великой миссии освобождения русской земли от фашизма! 📌Противник пытался остановить технику ПТУРами, артиллерией, дроном-камикадзе, но наши бойцы продолжили движение вперёд, не теряя боевого духа в направлении н.п. Острое. ❗️Боевые задачи выполнены, экипажи …
👍5❤1🕊1
⚪️ С 16 сентября ключевая ставка увеличена до 19% (ранее — 18%). Это уже второе повышение в 2024 году. Основная причина — рост инфляции. Банк России прогнозирует, что по итогам года инфляция превысит ожидаемые 6,5-7%. 🔍Что это значит для вас? - Кредиты станут дороже: ставки по ипотеке, потребительским и бизнес-кредитам вырастут. - Вклады станут более выгодными — банки будут предлагать повышенные проценты. - Рост сто…
✍4
Эльман Пашаев pinned a video
🔥 «Царь Мангал» — непобедимый герой Красногоровки! 📌На кадрах тот самый Т-72Б, «Царь Мангал» из танкового батальона — Панцирь 5-й ОМСБр, который стал символом мощи и неуязвимости. Оснащённый минным тралом и массивной защитой, похожей на ангар, он выдержал свыше 100 ударов, включая атаки «Джавелинов» и дронов иностранного производства. ❗️Под плотным огнём укропов «Царь Мангал» уверенно преодолел опасную местность и …
👍9❤1👏1🙏1
🪖Командир танка с позывным "Дядя Эльман" и командир роты "Фрол" — бойцы танкового батальона "Панцирь" 5-й ОМСБр. 🇷🇺Вместе, плечом к плечу, на передовой защищаем Родину! Эльман Пашаев. Подписаться 9️⃣
👍24🤣5👏1🕊1
⚪️Недавние события в Иркутском СИЗО стали поводом для серьёзного расследования. Как сообщает «Адвокатская газета», 9 сентября 2024 года президент Адвокатской палаты Иркутской области Олег Смирнов направил обращения к прокурору и начальнику ГУФСИН с требованием расследовать подозрения о прослушивании адвокатов и заключенных в СИЗО-6. 🔵26 августа адвокат Данил Проскурин обнаружил в следственном кабинете № 3 СИЗО-6 ус…
🔥8❤1
⚡️СНАЙПЕРЫ Дэйл и Лакоста 5-й ОМСБр на передовой! 🪖🇷🇺Это не учения, это настоящие бои в Красногоровке! Наши герои идут в бой, участвуя в крупной и жесткой операции. Реальная война, реальные испытания — каждое их движение приближает победу! Эльман Пашаев. Подписаться 9️⃣
🔥5👍3
⚪️Недавнее решение Верховного суда РФ подтвердило, что арбитражные суды могут учитывать электронные документы без необходимости их распечатки! 🔵Компания НПП «Спецкабель», проигравшая в Суде по интеллектуальным спорам, обжаловала решение, аргументируя, что суд не распечатал часть электронных приложений. Однако ВС РФ признал, что отсутствие бумажных копий не влияет на возможность суда и сторон оценивать документы. 📌Ч…
🔥4👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elmanpashaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,396,433 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Elman Pashayev |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian lawyer |
| YouTube | UCe-nEFBd8IXDLOLfZt_EF_Q |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эльман Пашаев” (@elmanpashaev), 445 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elmanpashaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.