Channel
@elmadad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
307subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001089502136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elmadad |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elmadad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 307 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 309 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 309 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 45.0% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мияга дам беринг! Шаҳарнинг чангли ҳавосидан танани тозаланг! Ота-онангиз, оилангиз, қариндошлар, синфдош, коллектив ва дўстлар учун ажойиб ретро табиат маскани! Шифобахш табиий сувларга тўлдирган бассейнда чўмилишсин! Ширин овқатлар пиширишсин! Табиат қўйнида айланиб роҳат олишсин! Болаларингиз ҳайвонот олами билан яқиндан танишсин.! Мевалардан узиб баҳраманд бўлишсин! Уларни дуоларини олинг! Нархи жудаям арзон! A…
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
НЕГА ЭРОН ТАРАФИДАСИЗ, БИЛАСИЗМИ?! Эпштейн оролидаги педофилик, қотиллик ва канибализм яъни қизалоқлар гўштини емоқлик ҳақидаги хабарлар дунёни ларзага солди. У оролга борганлар қудратли шахслар бўлиб уларни АҚШ ҳимоя қилишини ҳамма билар эди. Шу сабабдан ҳеч ким эътироз билдирмасдан турди. Инсоният уларга нафратланиб турганда айнан ўша Эпштейнчилар Эронга ҳужум қилди. Эрон уларга қаттиқ жавоб беришни бошлаши билан…
Видеога эътибор беринг! Исроилликларни хотиржам қилиш учун жонли эфирда Нетаняҳудан интервью олишди, зинадан тушаётганлар ичида йўқ эди, лекин бирдан у пайдо бўлдими?! Еврейлар технологияда кучли лекин барибир техника ҳам хатоликни кўрсатиб қўяди. Яна қандай хатолик бор видеода?! @elmadad
👏1
Ҳинд киноларини кўргансиз! Унда бир бола 35 ёшга кирганда тўсатдан бир одам келиб сани чақалоқлик пайтингда ман ташлаб кетгандим деса ҳалиги бола ўз отасини хоки пойини олиб турган жойида, бегона одамга қараб Ота!-деб юборади. Тўсатдан мутлақо яна бегона одам пайдо бўлиб, йўқ бу мани ўғлим мана бўйнимизда бир хил жойда холи бор деса, тош ойнага бола қараб ростдан мана холимиз бир хил экан деб унга ҳам Ота!-деб юборад…
🤣4😁1
Эрон Исроил бош вазири Бинямин Нетаняхунинг тирик эмаслигини эълон қилиб, халқаро ҳамжамиятни ларзага келтирди. Эрон расмийларининг таъкидлашича, Исроил ҳозирда мураккаб сунъий интеллект ва чуқур сохта технологиядан фойдаланиб, уни оммавий видеоларда "тирилтириб", омма руҳиятини кўтариш учун ички инқирозини яширмоқда. Бармоқ сонини кўпайтирмай борини гапирсада... 🤔 Менимча тирик. Исроил атай бармоқларни сонини кўпа…
Уйингда аза, яқин инсонингни ўлиги устида йиғлаб турибсан, тўсатдан кимдир бир сабаб билан хандон отиб кулди, ўша кулган одам овози ёқимсиз таъсир қилади. Нафақат сан бошқалар ҳам ўша кулганни мол, фаросатсиз экан деб ўйлайди. Уйингда тўй, яқин инсонингни бахт кечасида турибсан, тўсатдан кимдир дод солиб йиғлаб кетди. Қандай сабаб бўлмасин шодиёна кунни расво қилмоқда. Нафақат сан бошқалар ҳам ўша йиғлаганни мол, фа…
Видеода Исроилдан қочаётган еврейлар ва Ватани учун бомбардимондан қўрқмасдан кўчага чиққан эронликлар! Кўринг! Таққосланг! Хулоса чиқаринг! Нега Эронни тарафини Мардон Аслонов олади деганлар учун жавобим шу! @elmadad
❤2👏2🔥1
Сўнги хабарларга кўра, Вашингтон Эронга қарши атига 100 соат давом этган зарбалар давомида йилларга мўлжалланган муҳим ўқ-дорилар хусусан Patriot, THAADга ишлатиладиган ракеталарни ишлатиб бўлибди. Пентагон қўшимча 50 миллиард доллар миқдорида молиялаштириш учун сўров тайёрлаётган экан. Шу ерда бир савол туғилади. Давленияси 250га кўтарилган одамга агар аптекада керакли дори бўлмаса пули қанча бўлмасин унга ёрдам б…
Хаменеийнинг қайтиши! Эрон раҳбарининг шаҳид бўлиш лаҳзаси ва Қўшма Штатлар учун даҳшатли туш бошланиши ҳақида янги япон анимацияси! @elmadad
❤3
Охирги кунларда Эрон ракеталари Исроил шаҳрида тинч аҳолини бомбаламоқда деган хабарлар кенг тарқамоқда. Видеога эътибор билан қаранг! Исроил пойтахти Тел-авивда ҳаво мудофаа тизимлари аҳоли яшайдиган кўчаларга кўчирилган, у ердан ракета учирмоқда. Охирида Эронга тегишли ракета келиб айнан ўша тизимга зарба бермоқда. Ўз халқини орасига бекиниб олган муттаҳам ҳарбий тизимдан ҳар нарса кутса бўлади. Мардон Аслонов …
Видеода Исроилдан аҳоли қочмоқда, ур тўполон, жон сақлаш умидида. Энг қизиқ томони шундаки, Эронга чет элдаги эронликлар оғир кунда Ватаним ёнида бўламиз деб ёппасига қайтмоқда. Ватанга келибоқ Давлат билан биргаман деб Теҳрон кўчаларига байроқ кўтариб чиқишмоқда. Шундай бир бирига зид хабарларни эштиб туриб, қуйидаги сўз ёдга тушади: Ҳеч кимга бермаймиз сени Ўзбекистон 🇺🇿 @elmadad
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @elmadad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 580,280 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ELMADAD” (@elmadad), 307 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elmadad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.