Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال مشکات

Channel

کانال مشکات

@elm_em

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

853subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002025672007
TypeChannel
Username@elm_em
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/elm_em

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

849856852.514 September 2026 — 849 subscribers15 September 2026 — 849 subscribers29 September 2026 — 853 subscribers9 October 2026 — 850 subscribers15 October 2026 — 856 subscribers22 October 2026 — 854 subscribers30 October 2026 — 851 subscribers6 November 2026 — 853 subscribers85314 September 20266 November 2026
8 measurements spanning 53 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:57853+2
30 Oct 2026, 11:37851-3
22 Oct 2026, 19:40854-2
15 Oct 2026, 14:56856+6
9 Oct 2026, 11:19850-3
29 Sept 2026, 07:01853+4
15 Sept 2026, 00:19849no change
14 Sept 2026, 09:22849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC62 viewsread 14 September 2026

🔸 نسخه جدید این استدلال با ادعای صریح این مقدمه آغاز می‌شود که «هر ترکیبی... یک عمل فاهمه است» (§15, B 130) بخش بعدی استدلال با این ادعای معروف کانت آغاز می‌شود که «آنچه می‌اندیشم باید بتواند با تمام بازنمایی‌های من ملازمت داشته باشد... بنابراین تمام کثرت‌های بازنمایی، در همان سوژه ای که قرار است با این کثرت مواجه شود، رابطه‌ای ضروری با من می‌اندیشم دارند» (§16, B131-2). به عبارت دیگر، نسبت دادن هر بازنمایی به خود، ب…

10 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC87 viewsread 14 September 2026

🔸 با این حال، کانت در دو بخش بعدی تلاش می‌کند استدلال کند که ادراک نوعی حکم درباره ابژه ها است و بنابراین ذاتاً شامل مقولات می‌شود. او این کار را در بند ۱۸ با بیان اینکه «وحدت استعلایی ادراک» یک «وحدت ابژکتیو» است نه یک«وحدت سوبژکتیو آگاهی» (B 139) انجام می‌دهد، در حالی که برعکس در بند ۱۹ استدلال می‌کند که «یک حکم چیزی جز راهی برای رساندن شناخت‌های داده شده به وحدت ابژکتیو ادراک نیست» (B 141). 🔸 این باعث می‌شود اینط…

10 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC41 viewsread 14 September 2026

و از آنجا که وحدت استعلایی ادراک دلالت بر این قرابت دارد، کانت خود را محق می‌داند که ادعا کند «خودِ فاهمه، منبع قوانین طبیعت و بنابراین منبع وحدت صوری طبیعت است» (A 127). 🔸 این یک استدلال خارق‌العاده است،۴۸ که از چیزی که ما ممکن است آن را نوعی فرض دکارتی یقینی در مورد وحدت خود بدانیم، شروع می‌شود و با این نتیجه عمیقاً ضد هیومی پایان می‌یابد که فاهمه ضرورتاً منبع وحدت در طبیعت است. با این استدلال، ایده اولیه و کوپرن…

10 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC42 viewsread 14 September 2026

📌 استنتاج استعلایی 🔸کانت با گفتن اینکه ادراک ترکیبی است و در نتیجه یک ترکیب را پیش‌فرض می‌گیرد، منظورش این است که با نسبت دادن مجموعه‌ای از بازنمایی‌ها - کثرتی از مشاهدات خاص یا شهودهای تجربی - به خودمان، ادعا می‌کنیم که ارتباطی بین آنها وجود دارد - هر یک از آنها به همان خودی تعلق دارد که بقیه به آن تعلق دارند - که بخش منطقی محتوای هیچ یک از آنها به خودی خود نیست؛ بنابراین ارتباط بین بازنمایی‌های مختلف متعلق به یک خ…

9 Sept 2026, 23:54 UTC27 viewsread 14 September 2026

آیا مقصود از سؤال چهارم چیزی جز این است که ما باید -همان‌گونه که در اطلاق انسان بر افراد آن ملاکی ارائه دهیم که بر طبق سنّت رایج، همان جوهر نامی حسّاس متحرک بالاراده ناطق است- برای اطلاق وجود بر اشیاء ملاکی ارائه دهیم؟

9 Sept 2026, 23:54 UTC39 viewsread 14 September 2026

همانگونه نه، چون اگر همانگونه باشه، وجود میشه جنس عالی

9 Sept 2026, 23:54 UTC41 viewsread 14 September 2026

مقصود از این جهت نیست که جنس عالی است (هرچند تفاوتی از این حیث میان معقولات اولی و ثانیه قائل نیستم)، بلکه مقصود همان ملاک و معیار انتزاع و اطلاق است.

9 Sept 2026, 23:54 UTC31 viewsread 14 September 2026

من با معقول ثانی بودن وجود بماهو وجود هم موافق نیستم، اگر لازم باشه توضیح خواهم داد

9 Sept 2026, 23:54 UTC34 viewsread 14 September 2026

ما در فلسفه اسلامی به این علیت تحلیلی می‌گوییم. پس در واقع بازگشت سؤال چهارم به سؤال سوم است. ادامه بحث را اگر باشید بعد از نماز در خدمتم.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elm_em. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال روش تدریس
@raveshtadris · 23,543
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026
هنر فیلمنامه، کارگردان مولف
@honarefilmnameh · 27,153
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال مشکات” (@elm_em), 853 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elm_em.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.